Clinical audit of computed tomography requisition form in a himalayan country, Nepal

Introduction: Medical imaging requisition form is a vital document in the radiology department. Adequate filling ensures justification and effective communication which impacts patient care. This study aims to audit computed tomography (CT) requisition forms to determine their adequate filling and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anjan Dangal Dangal, Surendra Maharjan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: OsloMet — Oslo Metropolitan University 2023-04-01
Series:Radiography Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.oslomet.no/index.php/radopen/article/view/5155
_version_ 1797840134783107072
author Anjan Dangal Dangal
Surendra Maharjan
author_facet Anjan Dangal Dangal
Surendra Maharjan
author_sort Anjan Dangal Dangal
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Medical imaging requisition form is a vital document in the radiology department. Adequate filling ensures justification and effective communication which impacts patient care. This study aims to audit computed tomography (CT) requisition forms to determine their adequate filling and legibility in the Himalayan country, Nepal. Methods: A total of 239 CT requisition forms were collected from the Department of Radiology and Imaging, Bir Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal through random sampling from June to August 2020. The availability of information such as demographic characteristics, clinical history, clinical diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and proper name of CT procedures was audited. The legibility of the provided information was categorized with the help of a senior radiographer having 10 years of experience. Results: Clinical history was present in 28 percent and clinical diagnosis in 64 percent of forms. Furthermore, 44 percent of contrast-enhanced procedures requiring IV contrast agents did not have a report of renal function test. Surprisingly, details on the last menstrual period for women of the reproductive age group were missing in all requisition forms. Conclusion: Available information is not sufficient for justification of patient dose. Clinicians need to fill up the requisition form properly for quality patient care in the radiology department.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T16:09:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5914930384a54514a36c8330d86cf2ea
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2387-3345
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T16:09:45Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher OsloMet — Oslo Metropolitan University
record_format Article
series Radiography Open
spelling doaj.art-5914930384a54514a36c8330d86cf2ea2023-04-24T13:29:35ZengOsloMet — Oslo Metropolitan UniversityRadiography Open2387-33452023-04-0191 in progress10.7577/radopen.5155Clinical audit of computed tomography requisition form in a himalayan country, NepalAnjan Dangal Dangal0Surendra Maharjan1National Academy Of Medical SciencesIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana Introduction: Medical imaging requisition form is a vital document in the radiology department. Adequate filling ensures justification and effective communication which impacts patient care. This study aims to audit computed tomography (CT) requisition forms to determine their adequate filling and legibility in the Himalayan country, Nepal. Methods: A total of 239 CT requisition forms were collected from the Department of Radiology and Imaging, Bir Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal through random sampling from June to August 2020. The availability of information such as demographic characteristics, clinical history, clinical diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and proper name of CT procedures was audited. The legibility of the provided information was categorized with the help of a senior radiographer having 10 years of experience. Results: Clinical history was present in 28 percent and clinical diagnosis in 64 percent of forms. Furthermore, 44 percent of contrast-enhanced procedures requiring IV contrast agents did not have a report of renal function test. Surprisingly, details on the last menstrual period for women of the reproductive age group were missing in all requisition forms. Conclusion: Available information is not sufficient for justification of patient dose. Clinicians need to fill up the requisition form properly for quality patient care in the radiology department. https://journals.oslomet.no/index.php/radopen/article/view/5155Computed TomographyRequisition FormAuditJustification
spellingShingle Anjan Dangal Dangal
Surendra Maharjan
Clinical audit of computed tomography requisition form in a himalayan country, Nepal
Radiography Open
Computed Tomography
Requisition Form
Audit
Justification
title Clinical audit of computed tomography requisition form in a himalayan country, Nepal
title_full Clinical audit of computed tomography requisition form in a himalayan country, Nepal
title_fullStr Clinical audit of computed tomography requisition form in a himalayan country, Nepal
title_full_unstemmed Clinical audit of computed tomography requisition form in a himalayan country, Nepal
title_short Clinical audit of computed tomography requisition form in a himalayan country, Nepal
title_sort clinical audit of computed tomography requisition form in a himalayan country nepal
topic Computed Tomography
Requisition Form
Audit
Justification
url https://journals.oslomet.no/index.php/radopen/article/view/5155
work_keys_str_mv AT anjandangaldangal clinicalauditofcomputedtomographyrequisitionforminahimalayancountrynepal
AT surendramaharjan clinicalauditofcomputedtomographyrequisitionforminahimalayancountrynepal