Recommendations for patient involvement in health technology assessment in Central and Eastern European countries

IntroductionMeaningful patient involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) is essential in ensuring that the interests of the affected patient population, their families, and the general public are accurately reflected in coverage and reimbursement decisions. Central and Eastern European (CEE)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ivett Jakab, Maria Dimitrova, François Houÿez, Tamás Bereczky, Miroslava Fövényes, Zorana Maravic, Ivica Belina, Christian Andriciuc, Krisztina Tóth, Oresta Piniazhko, Rok Hren, Iñaki Gutierrez-Ibarluzea, Marcin Czech, Tomas Tesar, Maciej Niewada, László Lorenzovici, Maria Kamusheva, Manoela Manova, Alexandra Savova, Zornitsa Mitkova, Konstantin Tachkov, Bertalan Németh, Zsuzsanna Ida Petykó, Dalia Dawoud, Diana Delnoij, Saskia Knies, Wim Goettsch, Zoltán Kaló
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1176200/full
_version_ 1797789211359707136
author Ivett Jakab
Ivett Jakab
Maria Dimitrova
François Houÿez
Tamás Bereczky
Miroslava Fövényes
Zorana Maravic
Ivica Belina
Christian Andriciuc
Krisztina Tóth
Krisztina Tóth
Oresta Piniazhko
Rok Hren
Rok Hren
Iñaki Gutierrez-Ibarluzea
Marcin Czech
Tomas Tesar
Maciej Niewada
László Lorenzovici
László Lorenzovici
Maria Kamusheva
Manoela Manova
Manoela Manova
Alexandra Savova
Alexandra Savova
Zornitsa Mitkova
Konstantin Tachkov
Bertalan Németh
Zsuzsanna Ida Petykó
Zsuzsanna Ida Petykó
Dalia Dawoud
Diana Delnoij
Saskia Knies
Wim Goettsch
Wim Goettsch
Zoltán Kaló
Zoltán Kaló
author_facet Ivett Jakab
Ivett Jakab
Maria Dimitrova
François Houÿez
Tamás Bereczky
Miroslava Fövényes
Zorana Maravic
Ivica Belina
Christian Andriciuc
Krisztina Tóth
Krisztina Tóth
Oresta Piniazhko
Rok Hren
Rok Hren
Iñaki Gutierrez-Ibarluzea
Marcin Czech
Tomas Tesar
Maciej Niewada
László Lorenzovici
László Lorenzovici
Maria Kamusheva
Manoela Manova
Manoela Manova
Alexandra Savova
Alexandra Savova
Zornitsa Mitkova
Konstantin Tachkov
Bertalan Németh
Zsuzsanna Ida Petykó
Zsuzsanna Ida Petykó
Dalia Dawoud
Diana Delnoij
Saskia Knies
Wim Goettsch
Wim Goettsch
Zoltán Kaló
Zoltán Kaló
author_sort Ivett Jakab
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionMeaningful patient involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) is essential in ensuring that the interests of the affected patient population, their families, and the general public are accurately reflected in coverage and reimbursement decisions. Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries are generally at less advanced stages of implementing HTA, which is particularly true for patient involvement activities. As part of the Horizon2020 HTx project, this research aimed to form recommendations for critical barriers to patient involvement in HTA in CEE countries.MethodsBuilt on previous research findings on potential barriers, a prioritisation survey was conducted online with CEE stakeholders. Recommendations for prioritised barriers were formed through a face-to-face workshop by CEE stakeholders and HTx experts.ResultsA total of 105 stakeholders from 13 CEE countries completed the prioritisation survey and identified 12 of the 22 potential barriers as highly important. The workshop had 36 participants representing 9 CEE countries, and 5 Western European countries coming together to discuss solutions in order to form recommendations based on best practices, real-life experience, and transferability aspects. Stakeholder groups involved in both phases included HTA organisation representatives, payers, patients, caregivers, patient organisation representatives, patient experts, health care providers, academic and non-academic researchers, health care consultants and health technology manufacturers/providers. As a result, 12 recommendations were formed specified to the CEE region’s context, but potentially useful for a broader geographic audience.ConclusionIn this paper, we present 12 recommendations for meaningful, systematic, and sustainable patient involvement in HTA in CEE countries. Our hope is that engaging more than a hundred CEE stakeholders in the study helped to spread awareness of the importance and potential of patient involvement and that the resulting recommendations provide tangible steps for the way forward. Future studies shall focus on country-specific case studies of the implemented recommendations.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T01:47:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-591d4b58b631449dbc84d503029cd297
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-2565
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T01:47:30Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Public Health
spelling doaj.art-591d4b58b631449dbc84d503029cd2972023-07-03T04:48:52ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Public Health2296-25652023-07-011110.3389/fpubh.2023.11762001176200Recommendations for patient involvement in health technology assessment in Central and Eastern European countriesIvett Jakab0Ivett Jakab1Maria Dimitrova2François Houÿez3Tamás Bereczky4Miroslava Fövényes5Zorana Maravic6Ivica Belina7Christian Andriciuc8Krisztina Tóth9Krisztina Tóth10Oresta Piniazhko11Rok Hren12Rok Hren13Iñaki Gutierrez-Ibarluzea14Marcin Czech15Tomas Tesar16Maciej Niewada17László Lorenzovici18László Lorenzovici19Maria Kamusheva20Manoela Manova21Manoela Manova22Alexandra Savova23Alexandra Savova24Zornitsa Mitkova25Konstantin Tachkov26Bertalan Németh27Zsuzsanna Ida Petykó28Zsuzsanna Ida Petykó29Dalia Dawoud30Diana Delnoij31Saskia Knies32Wim Goettsch33Wim Goettsch34Zoltán Kaló35Zoltán Kaló36Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, HungaryPatient advocate, Budapest, HungaryFaculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, BulgariaEuropean Organisation for Rare Diseases (EURORDIS), Paris, FrancePatvocates GmbH, Riemerling, GermanyLymfoma Slovensko, Bratislava, SlovakiaDigestive Cancers Europe, Brussels, BelgiumCoalition of Associations in Healthcare, Zagreb, CroatiaRomanian Federation of Diabetes Associations, Cluj Napoca, RomaniaSyreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary0Bridge of Health Alliance against Breast Cancer Association, Budapest, Hungary1Health Technology Assessment Department of State Expert Centre, Ministry of Health of Ukraine, Kyiv, UkraineSyreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary2Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia3Basque Foundation for Health Innovation and Research, Landa, Spain4Head of Pharmacoeconomic Department, Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Poland5Department of Organisation and Management in Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia6Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland7Syreon Research Romania, Tirgu Mures, Romania8Department of Doctoral School of Medicine and Pharmacy, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology, Targu Mures, RomaniaFaculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, BulgariaFaculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria9National Council on Prices and Reimbursement of Medicines, Sofia, BulgariaFaculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria9National Council on Prices and Reimbursement of Medicines, Sofia, BulgariaFaculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, BulgariaFaculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, BulgariaSyreon Research Institute, Budapest, HungarySyreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary0Centre for Health Technology Assessment, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary1Science, Policy and Research Programme, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, United Kingdom2National Health Care Institute (ZIN), Diemen, Netherlands2National Health Care Institute (ZIN), Diemen, Netherlands2National Health Care Institute (ZIN), Diemen, Netherlands3WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Policy and Regulation, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, NetherlandsSyreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary0Centre for Health Technology Assessment, Semmelweis University, Budapest, HungaryIntroductionMeaningful patient involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) is essential in ensuring that the interests of the affected patient population, their families, and the general public are accurately reflected in coverage and reimbursement decisions. Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries are generally at less advanced stages of implementing HTA, which is particularly true for patient involvement activities. As part of the Horizon2020 HTx project, this research aimed to form recommendations for critical barriers to patient involvement in HTA in CEE countries.MethodsBuilt on previous research findings on potential barriers, a prioritisation survey was conducted online with CEE stakeholders. Recommendations for prioritised barriers were formed through a face-to-face workshop by CEE stakeholders and HTx experts.ResultsA total of 105 stakeholders from 13 CEE countries completed the prioritisation survey and identified 12 of the 22 potential barriers as highly important. The workshop had 36 participants representing 9 CEE countries, and 5 Western European countries coming together to discuss solutions in order to form recommendations based on best practices, real-life experience, and transferability aspects. Stakeholder groups involved in both phases included HTA organisation representatives, payers, patients, caregivers, patient organisation representatives, patient experts, health care providers, academic and non-academic researchers, health care consultants and health technology manufacturers/providers. As a result, 12 recommendations were formed specified to the CEE region’s context, but potentially useful for a broader geographic audience.ConclusionIn this paper, we present 12 recommendations for meaningful, systematic, and sustainable patient involvement in HTA in CEE countries. Our hope is that engaging more than a hundred CEE stakeholders in the study helped to spread awareness of the importance and potential of patient involvement and that the resulting recommendations provide tangible steps for the way forward. Future studies shall focus on country-specific case studies of the implemented recommendations.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1176200/fullpatient involvementhealth technology assessmentreimbursementdecision-makingCentral and Eastern Europe countriesstakeholder perspectives
spellingShingle Ivett Jakab
Ivett Jakab
Maria Dimitrova
François Houÿez
Tamás Bereczky
Miroslava Fövényes
Zorana Maravic
Ivica Belina
Christian Andriciuc
Krisztina Tóth
Krisztina Tóth
Oresta Piniazhko
Rok Hren
Rok Hren
Iñaki Gutierrez-Ibarluzea
Marcin Czech
Tomas Tesar
Maciej Niewada
László Lorenzovici
László Lorenzovici
Maria Kamusheva
Manoela Manova
Manoela Manova
Alexandra Savova
Alexandra Savova
Zornitsa Mitkova
Konstantin Tachkov
Bertalan Németh
Zsuzsanna Ida Petykó
Zsuzsanna Ida Petykó
Dalia Dawoud
Diana Delnoij
Saskia Knies
Wim Goettsch
Wim Goettsch
Zoltán Kaló
Zoltán Kaló
Recommendations for patient involvement in health technology assessment in Central and Eastern European countries
Frontiers in Public Health
patient involvement
health technology assessment
reimbursement
decision-making
Central and Eastern Europe countries
stakeholder perspectives
title Recommendations for patient involvement in health technology assessment in Central and Eastern European countries
title_full Recommendations for patient involvement in health technology assessment in Central and Eastern European countries
title_fullStr Recommendations for patient involvement in health technology assessment in Central and Eastern European countries
title_full_unstemmed Recommendations for patient involvement in health technology assessment in Central and Eastern European countries
title_short Recommendations for patient involvement in health technology assessment in Central and Eastern European countries
title_sort recommendations for patient involvement in health technology assessment in central and eastern european countries
topic patient involvement
health technology assessment
reimbursement
decision-making
Central and Eastern Europe countries
stakeholder perspectives
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1176200/full
work_keys_str_mv AT ivettjakab recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT ivettjakab recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT mariadimitrova recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT francoishouyez recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT tamasbereczky recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT miroslavafovenyes recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT zoranamaravic recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT ivicabelina recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT christianandriciuc recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT krisztinatoth recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT krisztinatoth recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT orestapiniazhko recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT rokhren recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT rokhren recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT inakigutierrezibarluzea recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT marcinczech recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT tomastesar recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT maciejniewada recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT laszlolorenzovici recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT laszlolorenzovici recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT mariakamusheva recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT manoelamanova recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT manoelamanova recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT alexandrasavova recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT alexandrasavova recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT zornitsamitkova recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT konstantintachkov recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT bertalannemeth recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT zsuzsannaidapetyko recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT zsuzsannaidapetyko recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT daliadawoud recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT dianadelnoij recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT saskiaknies recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT wimgoettsch recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT wimgoettsch recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT zoltankalo recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries
AT zoltankalo recommendationsforpatientinvolvementinhealthtechnologyassessmentincentralandeasterneuropeancountries