Which Predictive Equation Of Resting Energy Expenditure Has The Best Agreement With Indirect Calorimetry In Elderly Patients On Hemodialysis?

As the incidence of elderly patients initiating dialysis has been increasing, there is a need to develop specialized care to them. According to the European Best Practice Guideline, the energy needs of hemodialysis (HD) patients should be estimated by multiplying the resting energy expenditure (REE)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Juliana Rodrigues, Fernando Lamarca, Renata Fetter, Fernanda Bigogno, Cecilia Oliveira, Maria Kamimura, Flavia Baria, Lilian Cuppari, Carla Avesani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Korean Society of Nephrology 2012-06-01
Series:Kidney Research and Clinical Practice
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211913212006535
Description
Summary:As the incidence of elderly patients initiating dialysis has been increasing, there is a need to develop specialized care to them. According to the European Best Practice Guideline, the energy needs of hemodialysis (HD) patients should be estimated by multiplying the resting energy expenditure (REE), obtained by predictive equations, for the physical activity factor. The predictive equation that yields better agreement to the indirect calorimetry in elderly patients on HD has not been rated yet. We aimed to evaluate the agreement between indirect calorimetry (IC) and the predictive equations of Harris&Benedict (HB), Schofield and WHO/FAO 1985. Fifty-seven elderly patients (38 males (67%); 69±6 years) on HD were included. The REE (kcal/day) estimated by the equations were higher than that measured by IC: IC (1246 ±288); HB (1443 ±279); Schofield (1357 ±232); WHO 1985 (1384 ±226) (P<0.05). The HB equation had the lowest intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), the highest mean difference from the REE measured by IC and a high frequency of overestimation (Table). Intraclass CC (r; 95% CI) Bland-Altman* REE overestimation (%[n]) HB x REE 0.53(0.31;0.69) 188(-331; 709 59.6 [34] Schofield x REE 0.72(0.57;0.83) 112(-248; 472) 56.1 [32] WHO 1985 x REE 0.74(0.60;0.84) 139(-222; 499) 59.6 [34] ⁎ Mean difference and interquartile range; CI: confidence interval In conclusion, all predicted equations overestimated the REE in elderly HD patients. Among them, the HB equation had the worse agreement with IC.
ISSN:2211-9132