Efficacy and safety of indocyanine green tracer-guided lymph node dissection in minimally invasive radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundThe implementation of indocyanine green (ICG) tracer-guided lymph node dissection is still in the preliminary stages of laparoscopic surgery, and its safety and efficacy for gastric cancer remain unclear.MethodsA systematic review was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jixiang Zhao, Ke Li, Zikang Wang, Qingqing Ke, Jiapu Li, Yizhen Zhang, Xiaojiang Zhou, Yunzhi Zou, Conghua Song
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.884011/full
_version_ 1818491128887902208
author Jixiang Zhao
Ke Li
Ke Li
Zikang Wang
Zikang Wang
Qingqing Ke
Jiapu Li
Yizhen Zhang
Xiaojiang Zhou
Yunzhi Zou
Yunzhi Zou
Conghua Song
author_facet Jixiang Zhao
Ke Li
Ke Li
Zikang Wang
Zikang Wang
Qingqing Ke
Jiapu Li
Yizhen Zhang
Xiaojiang Zhou
Yunzhi Zou
Yunzhi Zou
Conghua Song
author_sort Jixiang Zhao
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundThe implementation of indocyanine green (ICG) tracer-guided lymph node dissection is still in the preliminary stages of laparoscopic surgery, and its safety and efficacy for gastric cancer remain unclear.MethodsA systematic review was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus to identify relevant subjects from inception to June 2022. The core indicators were the total number of harvested lymph nodes and the safety of the laparoscopic gastrectomy with ICG. A meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI).ResultsThirteen studies and 2,027 participants were included (642 for the ICG-group and 1,385 for the non-ICG group). The mean number of lymph nodes dissected in the ICG group was significantly greater than that in the non-ICG group (WMD = 6.24, 95% CI: 4.26 to 8.22, P <0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the mean number of positive lymph nodes dissected between the ICG and the non-ICG groups (WMD = 0.18, 95% CI: −0.70 to 1.07, P = 0.879). Additionally, ICG gastrectomy did not increase the risk in terms of the operative time, estimated blood loss, and postoperative complications.ConclusionICG tracer with favorable safety increases the number of harvested lymph nodes but not the number of positive lymph nodes in laparoscopic gastrectomy. More high-quality, large-sample-size randomized controlled trials are still needed to enhance this evidence.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T17:26:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-594f9e8ce22a453fa5c8084604c66268
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2234-943X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T17:26:17Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Oncology
spelling doaj.art-594f9e8ce22a453fa5c8084604c662682022-12-22T01:39:49ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2022-08-011210.3389/fonc.2022.884011884011Efficacy and safety of indocyanine green tracer-guided lymph node dissection in minimally invasive radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysisJixiang Zhao0Ke Li1Ke Li2Zikang Wang3Zikang Wang4Qingqing Ke5Jiapu Li6Yizhen Zhang7Xiaojiang Zhou8Yunzhi Zou9Yunzhi Zou10Conghua Song11Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, ChinaDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, ChinaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, ChinaDepartment of Gastroenterolog, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, ChinaDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, ChinaDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, ChinaDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, ChinaDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, ChinaDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, ChinaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, ChinaDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Hospital (Group) of Putian University, Putian, ChinaBackgroundThe implementation of indocyanine green (ICG) tracer-guided lymph node dissection is still in the preliminary stages of laparoscopic surgery, and its safety and efficacy for gastric cancer remain unclear.MethodsA systematic review was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus to identify relevant subjects from inception to June 2022. The core indicators were the total number of harvested lymph nodes and the safety of the laparoscopic gastrectomy with ICG. A meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI).ResultsThirteen studies and 2,027 participants were included (642 for the ICG-group and 1,385 for the non-ICG group). The mean number of lymph nodes dissected in the ICG group was significantly greater than that in the non-ICG group (WMD = 6.24, 95% CI: 4.26 to 8.22, P <0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the mean number of positive lymph nodes dissected between the ICG and the non-ICG groups (WMD = 0.18, 95% CI: −0.70 to 1.07, P = 0.879). Additionally, ICG gastrectomy did not increase the risk in terms of the operative time, estimated blood loss, and postoperative complications.ConclusionICG tracer with favorable safety increases the number of harvested lymph nodes but not the number of positive lymph nodes in laparoscopic gastrectomy. More high-quality, large-sample-size randomized controlled trials are still needed to enhance this evidence.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.884011/fullindocyanine greenlaparoscopic gastrectomygastric cancerefficacysafety
spellingShingle Jixiang Zhao
Ke Li
Ke Li
Zikang Wang
Zikang Wang
Qingqing Ke
Jiapu Li
Yizhen Zhang
Xiaojiang Zhou
Yunzhi Zou
Yunzhi Zou
Conghua Song
Efficacy and safety of indocyanine green tracer-guided lymph node dissection in minimally invasive radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Frontiers in Oncology
indocyanine green
laparoscopic gastrectomy
gastric cancer
efficacy
safety
title Efficacy and safety of indocyanine green tracer-guided lymph node dissection in minimally invasive radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy and safety of indocyanine green tracer-guided lymph node dissection in minimally invasive radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of indocyanine green tracer-guided lymph node dissection in minimally invasive radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of indocyanine green tracer-guided lymph node dissection in minimally invasive radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy and safety of indocyanine green tracer-guided lymph node dissection in minimally invasive radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of indocyanine green tracer guided lymph node dissection in minimally invasive radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer a systematic review and meta analysis
topic indocyanine green
laparoscopic gastrectomy
gastric cancer
efficacy
safety
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.884011/full
work_keys_str_mv AT jixiangzhao efficacyandsafetyofindocyaninegreentracerguidedlymphnodedissectioninminimallyinvasiveradicalgastrectomyforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT keli efficacyandsafetyofindocyaninegreentracerguidedlymphnodedissectioninminimallyinvasiveradicalgastrectomyforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT keli efficacyandsafetyofindocyaninegreentracerguidedlymphnodedissectioninminimallyinvasiveradicalgastrectomyforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zikangwang efficacyandsafetyofindocyaninegreentracerguidedlymphnodedissectioninminimallyinvasiveradicalgastrectomyforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zikangwang efficacyandsafetyofindocyaninegreentracerguidedlymphnodedissectioninminimallyinvasiveradicalgastrectomyforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT qingqingke efficacyandsafetyofindocyaninegreentracerguidedlymphnodedissectioninminimallyinvasiveradicalgastrectomyforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jiapuli efficacyandsafetyofindocyaninegreentracerguidedlymphnodedissectioninminimallyinvasiveradicalgastrectomyforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yizhenzhang efficacyandsafetyofindocyaninegreentracerguidedlymphnodedissectioninminimallyinvasiveradicalgastrectomyforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xiaojiangzhou efficacyandsafetyofindocyaninegreentracerguidedlymphnodedissectioninminimallyinvasiveradicalgastrectomyforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yunzhizou efficacyandsafetyofindocyaninegreentracerguidedlymphnodedissectioninminimallyinvasiveradicalgastrectomyforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yunzhizou efficacyandsafetyofindocyaninegreentracerguidedlymphnodedissectioninminimallyinvasiveradicalgastrectomyforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT conghuasong efficacyandsafetyofindocyaninegreentracerguidedlymphnodedissectioninminimallyinvasiveradicalgastrectomyforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis