Impact of large-scale distribution and subsequent use of free nicotine patches on primary care physician interaction

Abstract Background Large-scale distribution efforts of free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) have been documented to be cost-effective interventions for increasing smoking quit rates. However, despite nearly a dozen studies evaluating their effectiveness, none have examined whether free NRT provi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vladyslav Kushnir, Beth A. Sproule, John A. Cunningham
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-07-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-017-4548-5
_version_ 1811281896822276096
author Vladyslav Kushnir
Beth A. Sproule
John A. Cunningham
author_facet Vladyslav Kushnir
Beth A. Sproule
John A. Cunningham
author_sort Vladyslav Kushnir
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Large-scale distribution efforts of free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) have been documented to be cost-effective interventions for increasing smoking quit rates. However, despite nearly a dozen studies evaluating their effectiveness, none have examined whether free NRT provision promotes further primary care help-seeking and the impact that it may have on cessation efforts. Methods In the context of a randomized controlled trial, a secondary analysis was conducted on 1000 adult regular smokers randomized to be mailed a 5-week supply of nicotine patches or to a no intervention control group. Recipients and users of free nicotine patches at an 8 week follow-up were successfully case matched to controls based on age, gender, baseline level of nicotine dependence and intent to quit (n = 201 per group). Differences in physician interaction between the two groups were evaluated at both 8 week and 6 month follow-ups. The impact of physician interaction on self-reported smoking abstinence at each follow-up was also examined. Results Although no differences in physician interaction were noted between groups at the 8 week follow-up, at the 6 month follow-up, nicotine patch users reported greater frequency of discussing smoking with their physician (43.9%), as compared to the control group (30.3%) (p = 0.011). Across both groups, over 90% of those that discussed smoking with a physician were encouraged to quit and approximately 70% were provided with additional support. Separate ANOVAs revealed no significant impact of physician interaction on cessation (p > 0.05), regardless of group or follow-up period, however, at the 6 month follow-up, nicotine patch users who discussed cessation with a physician had made serious quit attempts at significantly greater rates (72.6%), compared to controls (49.1%) (p = 0.007). Conclusions Irrespective of group, the majority of smokers in the present study did not discuss cessation with their physician. Recipients and users of nicotine patches however, were more likely to discuss smoking with their physician, suggesting that the provision of free NRT particularly to those who are likely to use it may facilitate opportunities for benefits beyond the direct pharmacological effects of the medication. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov , NCT01429129 . Registered: 2 September 2011.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T01:41:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5960bb93e3f0460f86e59d46fb826108
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2458
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T01:41:55Z
publishDate 2017-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Public Health
spelling doaj.art-5960bb93e3f0460f86e59d46fb8261082022-12-22T03:08:09ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582017-07-011811910.1186/s12889-017-4548-5Impact of large-scale distribution and subsequent use of free nicotine patches on primary care physician interactionVladyslav Kushnir0Beth A. Sproule1John A. Cunningham2Centre for Addiction and Mental HealthCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthAbstract Background Large-scale distribution efforts of free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) have been documented to be cost-effective interventions for increasing smoking quit rates. However, despite nearly a dozen studies evaluating their effectiveness, none have examined whether free NRT provision promotes further primary care help-seeking and the impact that it may have on cessation efforts. Methods In the context of a randomized controlled trial, a secondary analysis was conducted on 1000 adult regular smokers randomized to be mailed a 5-week supply of nicotine patches or to a no intervention control group. Recipients and users of free nicotine patches at an 8 week follow-up were successfully case matched to controls based on age, gender, baseline level of nicotine dependence and intent to quit (n = 201 per group). Differences in physician interaction between the two groups were evaluated at both 8 week and 6 month follow-ups. The impact of physician interaction on self-reported smoking abstinence at each follow-up was also examined. Results Although no differences in physician interaction were noted between groups at the 8 week follow-up, at the 6 month follow-up, nicotine patch users reported greater frequency of discussing smoking with their physician (43.9%), as compared to the control group (30.3%) (p = 0.011). Across both groups, over 90% of those that discussed smoking with a physician were encouraged to quit and approximately 70% were provided with additional support. Separate ANOVAs revealed no significant impact of physician interaction on cessation (p > 0.05), regardless of group or follow-up period, however, at the 6 month follow-up, nicotine patch users who discussed cessation with a physician had made serious quit attempts at significantly greater rates (72.6%), compared to controls (49.1%) (p = 0.007). Conclusions Irrespective of group, the majority of smokers in the present study did not discuss cessation with their physician. Recipients and users of nicotine patches however, were more likely to discuss smoking with their physician, suggesting that the provision of free NRT particularly to those who are likely to use it may facilitate opportunities for benefits beyond the direct pharmacological effects of the medication. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov , NCT01429129 . Registered: 2 September 2011.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-017-4548-5Smoking cessationNicotine replacement therapyPrimary care physiciansTobaccoHealth professionals
spellingShingle Vladyslav Kushnir
Beth A. Sproule
John A. Cunningham
Impact of large-scale distribution and subsequent use of free nicotine patches on primary care physician interaction
BMC Public Health
Smoking cessation
Nicotine replacement therapy
Primary care physicians
Tobacco
Health professionals
title Impact of large-scale distribution and subsequent use of free nicotine patches on primary care physician interaction
title_full Impact of large-scale distribution and subsequent use of free nicotine patches on primary care physician interaction
title_fullStr Impact of large-scale distribution and subsequent use of free nicotine patches on primary care physician interaction
title_full_unstemmed Impact of large-scale distribution and subsequent use of free nicotine patches on primary care physician interaction
title_short Impact of large-scale distribution and subsequent use of free nicotine patches on primary care physician interaction
title_sort impact of large scale distribution and subsequent use of free nicotine patches on primary care physician interaction
topic Smoking cessation
Nicotine replacement therapy
Primary care physicians
Tobacco
Health professionals
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-017-4548-5
work_keys_str_mv AT vladyslavkushnir impactoflargescaledistributionandsubsequentuseoffreenicotinepatchesonprimarycarephysicianinteraction
AT bethasproule impactoflargescaledistributionandsubsequentuseoffreenicotinepatchesonprimarycarephysicianinteraction
AT johnacunningham impactoflargescaledistributionandsubsequentuseoffreenicotinepatchesonprimarycarephysicianinteraction