Comparison of CTVHR and organs at risk contours between TRUS and MR images in IB cervical cancers: a proof of concept study

Abstract Purpose To compare CTVHR and OAR dimensions and inter-rater agreement between magnetic resonance (MR) and trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) images in IB cervical cancer patients. Methods IB cervical cancer patients treated with (chemo)radiotherapy plus MR-guided brachytherapy (BT) were prospec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lucas C. Mendez, Ananth Ravi, Kevin Martell, Hamid Raziee, Yasir Alayed, Matt Wronski, Moti Paudel, Elizabeth Barnes, Amandeep Taggar, C. S. Wong, Eric Leung
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-04-01
Series:Radiation Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13014-020-01516-4
_version_ 1811270669764132864
author Lucas C. Mendez
Ananth Ravi
Kevin Martell
Hamid Raziee
Yasir Alayed
Matt Wronski
Moti Paudel
Elizabeth Barnes
Amandeep Taggar
C. S. Wong
Eric Leung
author_facet Lucas C. Mendez
Ananth Ravi
Kevin Martell
Hamid Raziee
Yasir Alayed
Matt Wronski
Moti Paudel
Elizabeth Barnes
Amandeep Taggar
C. S. Wong
Eric Leung
author_sort Lucas C. Mendez
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Purpose To compare CTVHR and OAR dimensions and inter-rater agreement between magnetic resonance (MR) and trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) images in IB cervical cancer patients. Methods IB cervical cancer patients treated with (chemo)radiotherapy plus MR-guided brachytherapy (BT) were prospectively enrolled in this study. Radiation oncologists contoured CTVHR and OARs in pre-BT MR images (MRI) and intra-operative TRUS images. These contours were subsequently compared in regard to volume and dimension. Contour inter-rater agreement analysis was also investigated using kappa index (KI). Stata 15.0 was used for statistical analysis and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results TRUS CTVHR volumes were statistically smaller than the respective MRI contoured volumes. TRUS CTVHR thickness was found to be consistently smaller than MRI contours in all patients. No statistical difference was seen in width and height between the two different imaging modalities. MRI contours had a median KI of 0.66 (range: 0.56–0.77) while TRUS-based contours had a median KI of 0.64 (range: 0.47–0.77). Bladder and rectum had very satisfactory KI in both imaging modalities. Vaginal contours had moderate agreement in MR (0.52) and in TRUS images (0.58). Conclusion TRUS images allow good visualization of CTVHR and OARs in IB cervical cancer patients. Inter-rater contour variability was comparable between TRUS and MR images. TRUS is a promising modality on its own for image-guided BT.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T22:06:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-596e0b9e12a04cbea17929c54583d403
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1748-717X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T22:06:13Z
publishDate 2020-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Radiation Oncology
spelling doaj.art-596e0b9e12a04cbea17929c54583d4032022-12-22T03:14:56ZengBMCRadiation Oncology1748-717X2020-04-011511810.1186/s13014-020-01516-4Comparison of CTVHR and organs at risk contours between TRUS and MR images in IB cervical cancers: a proof of concept studyLucas C. Mendez0Ananth Ravi1Kevin Martell2Hamid Raziee3Yasir Alayed4Matt Wronski5Moti Paudel6Elizabeth Barnes7Amandeep Taggar8C. S. Wong9Eric Leung10Department of Radiation Oncology, University of TorontoSunnybrook Health Sciences CentreDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of TorontoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of TorontoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of TorontoSunnybrook Health Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Sciences CentreDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of TorontoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of TorontoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of TorontoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of TorontoAbstract Purpose To compare CTVHR and OAR dimensions and inter-rater agreement between magnetic resonance (MR) and trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) images in IB cervical cancer patients. Methods IB cervical cancer patients treated with (chemo)radiotherapy plus MR-guided brachytherapy (BT) were prospectively enrolled in this study. Radiation oncologists contoured CTVHR and OARs in pre-BT MR images (MRI) and intra-operative TRUS images. These contours were subsequently compared in regard to volume and dimension. Contour inter-rater agreement analysis was also investigated using kappa index (KI). Stata 15.0 was used for statistical analysis and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results TRUS CTVHR volumes were statistically smaller than the respective MRI contoured volumes. TRUS CTVHR thickness was found to be consistently smaller than MRI contours in all patients. No statistical difference was seen in width and height between the two different imaging modalities. MRI contours had a median KI of 0.66 (range: 0.56–0.77) while TRUS-based contours had a median KI of 0.64 (range: 0.47–0.77). Bladder and rectum had very satisfactory KI in both imaging modalities. Vaginal contours had moderate agreement in MR (0.52) and in TRUS images (0.58). Conclusion TRUS images allow good visualization of CTVHR and OARs in IB cervical cancer patients. Inter-rater contour variability was comparable between TRUS and MR images. TRUS is a promising modality on its own for image-guided BT.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13014-020-01516-4Cervical cancerBrachytherapyTransrectal ultrasound
spellingShingle Lucas C. Mendez
Ananth Ravi
Kevin Martell
Hamid Raziee
Yasir Alayed
Matt Wronski
Moti Paudel
Elizabeth Barnes
Amandeep Taggar
C. S. Wong
Eric Leung
Comparison of CTVHR and organs at risk contours between TRUS and MR images in IB cervical cancers: a proof of concept study
Radiation Oncology
Cervical cancer
Brachytherapy
Transrectal ultrasound
title Comparison of CTVHR and organs at risk contours between TRUS and MR images in IB cervical cancers: a proof of concept study
title_full Comparison of CTVHR and organs at risk contours between TRUS and MR images in IB cervical cancers: a proof of concept study
title_fullStr Comparison of CTVHR and organs at risk contours between TRUS and MR images in IB cervical cancers: a proof of concept study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of CTVHR and organs at risk contours between TRUS and MR images in IB cervical cancers: a proof of concept study
title_short Comparison of CTVHR and organs at risk contours between TRUS and MR images in IB cervical cancers: a proof of concept study
title_sort comparison of ctvhr and organs at risk contours between trus and mr images in ib cervical cancers a proof of concept study
topic Cervical cancer
Brachytherapy
Transrectal ultrasound
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13014-020-01516-4
work_keys_str_mv AT lucascmendez comparisonofctvhrandorgansatriskcontoursbetweentrusandmrimagesinibcervicalcancersaproofofconceptstudy
AT ananthravi comparisonofctvhrandorgansatriskcontoursbetweentrusandmrimagesinibcervicalcancersaproofofconceptstudy
AT kevinmartell comparisonofctvhrandorgansatriskcontoursbetweentrusandmrimagesinibcervicalcancersaproofofconceptstudy
AT hamidraziee comparisonofctvhrandorgansatriskcontoursbetweentrusandmrimagesinibcervicalcancersaproofofconceptstudy
AT yasiralayed comparisonofctvhrandorgansatriskcontoursbetweentrusandmrimagesinibcervicalcancersaproofofconceptstudy
AT mattwronski comparisonofctvhrandorgansatriskcontoursbetweentrusandmrimagesinibcervicalcancersaproofofconceptstudy
AT motipaudel comparisonofctvhrandorgansatriskcontoursbetweentrusandmrimagesinibcervicalcancersaproofofconceptstudy
AT elizabethbarnes comparisonofctvhrandorgansatriskcontoursbetweentrusandmrimagesinibcervicalcancersaproofofconceptstudy
AT amandeeptaggar comparisonofctvhrandorgansatriskcontoursbetweentrusandmrimagesinibcervicalcancersaproofofconceptstudy
AT cswong comparisonofctvhrandorgansatriskcontoursbetweentrusandmrimagesinibcervicalcancersaproofofconceptstudy
AT ericleung comparisonofctvhrandorgansatriskcontoursbetweentrusandmrimagesinibcervicalcancersaproofofconceptstudy