Comparative ultrasonographic evaluation of the masseter muscle in patients with and without oral submucous fibrosis

Background: The gold standard for diagnosing oral submucous fibrosis (OSF) is histopathology, but it causes scarring and worsens the illness. Ultrasonography (USG) has been employed in recent research to assess the cross-sectional dimensions of head and neck muscles in OSF patients. Aim: This study...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ayappali Kalluvalappil, Anita Balan, Tinky Bose Chandrabose, Muraleedharan Venugopal, Jesmith E Jacob, Sunu Ramachandran
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2023-01-01
Series:Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jiaomr.in/article.asp?issn=0972-1363;year=2023;volume=35;issue=1;spage=75;epage=81;aulast=Kalluvalappil
_version_ 1797775553685618688
author Ayappali Kalluvalappil
Anita Balan
Tinky Bose Chandrabose
Muraleedharan Venugopal
Jesmith E Jacob
Sunu Ramachandran
author_facet Ayappali Kalluvalappil
Anita Balan
Tinky Bose Chandrabose
Muraleedharan Venugopal
Jesmith E Jacob
Sunu Ramachandran
author_sort Ayappali Kalluvalappil
collection DOAJ
description Background: The gold standard for diagnosing oral submucous fibrosis (OSF) is histopathology, but it causes scarring and worsens the illness. Ultrasonography (USG) has been employed in recent research to assess the cross-sectional dimensions of head and neck muscles in OSF patients. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the ultrasonographic changes in the cross-sectional thickness of masseteric muscle in patients with and without OSF. Also, to compare the cross-sectional thickness of masseteric muscle in patients with different clinical stages and histologic grades of OSF. Methods: The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. The study population was divided into cases and controls. Cases consisted of 63 patients clinically diagnosed as having OSF and controls consisted of 63 persons selected from the patients attending the department of Oral Medicine and Radiology. According to Khanna and Andrade's criteria, OSF patients were divided into four groups based on their clinical findings. Ultrasonography of masseter muscle was performed with a high-resolution real-time LOGIQUE C5 ultrasound scanner with 7–12 MHz transducers. Results: One-way ANOVA and t test were used to evaluate the results. The study showed a clear association of masseter muscle hypertrophy with OSF. In controls, ultrasound measurements of masseter muscle thickness were statistically significant. In the case group, masseter muscle thickness was increased as the duration and frequency of the chewing increased and also as the disease progressed. Conclusions: USG is a valuable, radiation-free, and noninvasive better diagnostic tool than clinical and histopathological examinations for OSF evaluation.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T22:37:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5976b14f59624786838b324aebe0250b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0972-1363
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T22:37:18Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology
spelling doaj.art-5976b14f59624786838b324aebe0250b2023-07-21T11:41:25ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology0972-13632023-01-01351758110.4103/jiaomr.jiaomr_337_22Comparative ultrasonographic evaluation of the masseter muscle in patients with and without oral submucous fibrosisAyappali KalluvalappilAnita BalanTinky Bose ChandraboseMuraleedharan VenugopalJesmith E JacobSunu RamachandranBackground: The gold standard for diagnosing oral submucous fibrosis (OSF) is histopathology, but it causes scarring and worsens the illness. Ultrasonography (USG) has been employed in recent research to assess the cross-sectional dimensions of head and neck muscles in OSF patients. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the ultrasonographic changes in the cross-sectional thickness of masseteric muscle in patients with and without OSF. Also, to compare the cross-sectional thickness of masseteric muscle in patients with different clinical stages and histologic grades of OSF. Methods: The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. The study population was divided into cases and controls. Cases consisted of 63 patients clinically diagnosed as having OSF and controls consisted of 63 persons selected from the patients attending the department of Oral Medicine and Radiology. According to Khanna and Andrade's criteria, OSF patients were divided into four groups based on their clinical findings. Ultrasonography of masseter muscle was performed with a high-resolution real-time LOGIQUE C5 ultrasound scanner with 7–12 MHz transducers. Results: One-way ANOVA and t test were used to evaluate the results. The study showed a clear association of masseter muscle hypertrophy with OSF. In controls, ultrasound measurements of masseter muscle thickness were statistically significant. In the case group, masseter muscle thickness was increased as the duration and frequency of the chewing increased and also as the disease progressed. Conclusions: USG is a valuable, radiation-free, and noninvasive better diagnostic tool than clinical and histopathological examinations for OSF evaluation.http://www.jiaomr.in/article.asp?issn=0972-1363;year=2023;volume=35;issue=1;spage=75;epage=81;aulast=Kalluvalappilmasseter hypertrophymasseter muscleoral submucous fibrosisthicknessultrasonography
spellingShingle Ayappali Kalluvalappil
Anita Balan
Tinky Bose Chandrabose
Muraleedharan Venugopal
Jesmith E Jacob
Sunu Ramachandran
Comparative ultrasonographic evaluation of the masseter muscle in patients with and without oral submucous fibrosis
Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology
masseter hypertrophy
masseter muscle
oral submucous fibrosis
thickness
ultrasonography
title Comparative ultrasonographic evaluation of the masseter muscle in patients with and without oral submucous fibrosis
title_full Comparative ultrasonographic evaluation of the masseter muscle in patients with and without oral submucous fibrosis
title_fullStr Comparative ultrasonographic evaluation of the masseter muscle in patients with and without oral submucous fibrosis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative ultrasonographic evaluation of the masseter muscle in patients with and without oral submucous fibrosis
title_short Comparative ultrasonographic evaluation of the masseter muscle in patients with and without oral submucous fibrosis
title_sort comparative ultrasonographic evaluation of the masseter muscle in patients with and without oral submucous fibrosis
topic masseter hypertrophy
masseter muscle
oral submucous fibrosis
thickness
ultrasonography
url http://www.jiaomr.in/article.asp?issn=0972-1363;year=2023;volume=35;issue=1;spage=75;epage=81;aulast=Kalluvalappil
work_keys_str_mv AT ayappalikalluvalappil comparativeultrasonographicevaluationofthemassetermuscleinpatientswithandwithoutoralsubmucousfibrosis
AT anitabalan comparativeultrasonographicevaluationofthemassetermuscleinpatientswithandwithoutoralsubmucousfibrosis
AT tinkybosechandrabose comparativeultrasonographicevaluationofthemassetermuscleinpatientswithandwithoutoralsubmucousfibrosis
AT muraleedharanvenugopal comparativeultrasonographicevaluationofthemassetermuscleinpatientswithandwithoutoralsubmucousfibrosis
AT jesmithejacob comparativeultrasonographicevaluationofthemassetermuscleinpatientswithandwithoutoralsubmucousfibrosis
AT sunuramachandran comparativeultrasonographicevaluationofthemassetermuscleinpatientswithandwithoutoralsubmucousfibrosis