Intramedullary nailing for pertrochanteric fractures of proximal femur: a consecutive series of 323 patients treated with two devices

Abstract Introduction Pertrochanteric fractures (PFs) frequently affect the lower limb of osteoporotic patients and represent an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly. In this prospective randomized controlled trial, we have compared functional and radiological results and compli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pompeo Catania, Daniele Passaretti, Giorgio Montemurro, Simone Ripanti, Stefano Carbone, Vittorio Candela, Michele Carnovale, Stefano Gumina, Francecsco Pallotta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-12-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1506-1
_version_ 1811186733658669056
author Pompeo Catania
Daniele Passaretti
Giorgio Montemurro
Simone Ripanti
Stefano Carbone
Vittorio Candela
Michele Carnovale
Stefano Gumina
Francecsco Pallotta
author_facet Pompeo Catania
Daniele Passaretti
Giorgio Montemurro
Simone Ripanti
Stefano Carbone
Vittorio Candela
Michele Carnovale
Stefano Gumina
Francecsco Pallotta
author_sort Pompeo Catania
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction Pertrochanteric fractures (PFs) frequently affect the lower limb of osteoporotic patients and represent an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly. In this prospective randomized controlled trial, we have compared functional and radiological results and complications of patients affected by PFs treated with two intramedullary proximal femoral nails. Materials We enrolled 323 subjects with PFs, classified according to AO/OTA system as 31.A1 (pertrochanteric simple) and 31.A2 (pertrochanteric multifragmentary). Patients were divided into two groups according to the osteosynthesis devices: group A, Elos-Intrauma® nail (155 cases) and group B, Gamma 3-Stryker® nail (168 cases). Pre-operatively, the baseline characteristics of each patient (gender, age, weight and BMI) were collected. Intraoperative blood loss, subjective pain by visual analogue scale (VAS), esthetic satisfaction, functional scores of the hip by Harris Hip Score (HHS), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) were noted. The post-operative degree of fracture reduction was assessed. Each patient had a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Results The study group was composed of 106 male and 217 female with an average age of 85.4 (range, 65–90, standard deviation (SD) 5.95) years. No statistical differences about sex and age distribution were noted between the two groups. Group A reported lower intraoperative blood loss, 45 ml vs 51 ml, respectively (p < 0.001). There was not any statistical difference about operative time. Group A had a better reduction of fracture (p = 0.0347). The greatest difference was detectable comparing subgroups 31.A2 (p = 0.032). There were no statistical differences about complication frequency and the overall rate was 25% (80 cases). Finally, there was no difference in terms of VAS, HHS, and WOMAC score between the two groups on each follow-up. Patients of group A showed a higher subjective satisfaction index at 1 post-operative year, 7.42 (SD 1.19) vs 6.45 (SD 1.35) of group B (p < 0.001). Conclusion Elos® nail is a reliable device on a short-term follow-up and represents an alternative choice to the Gamma 3® nail, a well-known and appreciated system for over 25 years.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T13:50:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5977fc3123824f58b6b6e2b416530a2a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1749-799X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T13:50:31Z
publishDate 2019-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
spelling doaj.art-5977fc3123824f58b6b6e2b416530a2a2022-12-22T04:20:38ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2019-12-011411710.1186/s13018-019-1506-1Intramedullary nailing for pertrochanteric fractures of proximal femur: a consecutive series of 323 patients treated with two devicesPompeo Catania0Daniele Passaretti1Giorgio Montemurro2Simone Ripanti3Stefano Carbone4Vittorio Candela5Michele Carnovale6Stefano Gumina7Francecsco Pallotta8Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, San Giovanni-Addolorata HospitalDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, C.T.O. HospitalDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, San Giovanni-Addolorata HospitalDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, San Giovanni-Addolorata HospitalDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Clinica San FelicianoDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Sapienza University of RomeDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Sapienza University of RomeDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Sapienza University of RomeDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, San Giovanni-Addolorata HospitalAbstract Introduction Pertrochanteric fractures (PFs) frequently affect the lower limb of osteoporotic patients and represent an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly. In this prospective randomized controlled trial, we have compared functional and radiological results and complications of patients affected by PFs treated with two intramedullary proximal femoral nails. Materials We enrolled 323 subjects with PFs, classified according to AO/OTA system as 31.A1 (pertrochanteric simple) and 31.A2 (pertrochanteric multifragmentary). Patients were divided into two groups according to the osteosynthesis devices: group A, Elos-Intrauma® nail (155 cases) and group B, Gamma 3-Stryker® nail (168 cases). Pre-operatively, the baseline characteristics of each patient (gender, age, weight and BMI) were collected. Intraoperative blood loss, subjective pain by visual analogue scale (VAS), esthetic satisfaction, functional scores of the hip by Harris Hip Score (HHS), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) were noted. The post-operative degree of fracture reduction was assessed. Each patient had a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Results The study group was composed of 106 male and 217 female with an average age of 85.4 (range, 65–90, standard deviation (SD) 5.95) years. No statistical differences about sex and age distribution were noted between the two groups. Group A reported lower intraoperative blood loss, 45 ml vs 51 ml, respectively (p < 0.001). There was not any statistical difference about operative time. Group A had a better reduction of fracture (p = 0.0347). The greatest difference was detectable comparing subgroups 31.A2 (p = 0.032). There were no statistical differences about complication frequency and the overall rate was 25% (80 cases). Finally, there was no difference in terms of VAS, HHS, and WOMAC score between the two groups on each follow-up. Patients of group A showed a higher subjective satisfaction index at 1 post-operative year, 7.42 (SD 1.19) vs 6.45 (SD 1.35) of group B (p < 0.001). Conclusion Elos® nail is a reliable device on a short-term follow-up and represents an alternative choice to the Gamma 3® nail, a well-known and appreciated system for over 25 years.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1506-1Pertrochanteric fracturesFemur intramedullary nailingElderly fracture treatmentGamma nailElos nail
spellingShingle Pompeo Catania
Daniele Passaretti
Giorgio Montemurro
Simone Ripanti
Stefano Carbone
Vittorio Candela
Michele Carnovale
Stefano Gumina
Francecsco Pallotta
Intramedullary nailing for pertrochanteric fractures of proximal femur: a consecutive series of 323 patients treated with two devices
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Pertrochanteric fractures
Femur intramedullary nailing
Elderly fracture treatment
Gamma nail
Elos nail
title Intramedullary nailing for pertrochanteric fractures of proximal femur: a consecutive series of 323 patients treated with two devices
title_full Intramedullary nailing for pertrochanteric fractures of proximal femur: a consecutive series of 323 patients treated with two devices
title_fullStr Intramedullary nailing for pertrochanteric fractures of proximal femur: a consecutive series of 323 patients treated with two devices
title_full_unstemmed Intramedullary nailing for pertrochanteric fractures of proximal femur: a consecutive series of 323 patients treated with two devices
title_short Intramedullary nailing for pertrochanteric fractures of proximal femur: a consecutive series of 323 patients treated with two devices
title_sort intramedullary nailing for pertrochanteric fractures of proximal femur a consecutive series of 323 patients treated with two devices
topic Pertrochanteric fractures
Femur intramedullary nailing
Elderly fracture treatment
Gamma nail
Elos nail
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1506-1
work_keys_str_mv AT pompeocatania intramedullarynailingforpertrochantericfracturesofproximalfemuraconsecutiveseriesof323patientstreatedwithtwodevices
AT danielepassaretti intramedullarynailingforpertrochantericfracturesofproximalfemuraconsecutiveseriesof323patientstreatedwithtwodevices
AT giorgiomontemurro intramedullarynailingforpertrochantericfracturesofproximalfemuraconsecutiveseriesof323patientstreatedwithtwodevices
AT simoneripanti intramedullarynailingforpertrochantericfracturesofproximalfemuraconsecutiveseriesof323patientstreatedwithtwodevices
AT stefanocarbone intramedullarynailingforpertrochantericfracturesofproximalfemuraconsecutiveseriesof323patientstreatedwithtwodevices
AT vittoriocandela intramedullarynailingforpertrochantericfracturesofproximalfemuraconsecutiveseriesof323patientstreatedwithtwodevices
AT michelecarnovale intramedullarynailingforpertrochantericfracturesofproximalfemuraconsecutiveseriesof323patientstreatedwithtwodevices
AT stefanogumina intramedullarynailingforpertrochantericfracturesofproximalfemuraconsecutiveseriesof323patientstreatedwithtwodevices
AT francecscopallotta intramedullarynailingforpertrochantericfracturesofproximalfemuraconsecutiveseriesof323patientstreatedwithtwodevices