The Prevalence and Risk Factors for S2 Alar-Iliac Screw Loosening with a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

Study Design A retrospective cohort study. Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence and risk factors for S2 alar-iliac (SAI) screw loosening following lumbosacral fixation, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Overview of Literature Although SAI screws allow surgeons to perfor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hiroaki Nakashima, Tokumi Kanemura, Kotaro Satake, Kenyu Ito, Yoshimoto Ishikawa, Jun Ouchida, Naoki Segi, Hidetoshi Yamaguchi, Shiro Imagama
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Spine Society 2020-04-01
Series:Asian Spine Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-2019-0127.pdf
_version_ 1819047551691653120
author Hiroaki Nakashima
Tokumi Kanemura
Kotaro Satake
Kenyu Ito
Yoshimoto Ishikawa
Jun Ouchida
Naoki Segi
Hidetoshi Yamaguchi
Shiro Imagama
author_facet Hiroaki Nakashima
Tokumi Kanemura
Kotaro Satake
Kenyu Ito
Yoshimoto Ishikawa
Jun Ouchida
Naoki Segi
Hidetoshi Yamaguchi
Shiro Imagama
author_sort Hiroaki Nakashima
collection DOAJ
description Study Design A retrospective cohort study. Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence and risk factors for S2 alar-iliac (SAI) screw loosening following lumbosacral fixation, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Overview of Literature Although SAI screws allow surgeons to perform lumbosacral fixation with a low profile and enhanced biomechanical strength, screw loosening following surgery can occur in some cases. However, few studies have investigated the prevalence and risk factors for SAI screw loosening. Methods This retrospective study included 35 patients (mean age, 72.8±8.0 years; male, 10; female, 25) who underwent lumbosacral fixation using SAI screws with at least 2 years of follow-up. SAI screw loosening and L5–S bony fusion were assessed using computed tomography. The period for which the screws appeared loose and the risk factors for SAI screw loosening were investigated 2 years after surgery. Results A total of 70 SAI screws and 70 S1 pedicle screws were inserted. Loosening was observed 0.5, 1, and 2 years after surgery in 17 (24.3%), 35 (50.0%), and 35 (50.0%) SAI screws, respectively. Bony fusion rate at L5–S was significantly lower in patients with SAI screw loosening than in those without screw loosening (65.0% vs. 93.3%, p =0.048). The score for SAI screw contact with the iliac cortical bone and the bony fusion rate at L5–S were significantly lower in the loosening group than in the non-loosening group (1.8±0.5 vs. 2.2±0.3, p <0.001, respectively). Postoperative pelvic incidence–lumbar lordosis was significantly higher in the loosening group than in the non-loosening group (7.9°±15.4° vs. 0.5°±8.7°, p =0.02, respectively). Conclusions SAI screw loosening is closely correlated with pseudoarthrosis at L5–S. Appropriate screw insertion and optimal lumbar lordosis restoration are important to prevent postoperative complications related to SAI screws.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T11:02:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5978e5266c8c415db4a91925132072d7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1976-1902
1976-7846
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T11:02:10Z
publishDate 2020-04-01
publisher Korean Spine Society
record_format Article
series Asian Spine Journal
spelling doaj.art-5978e5266c8c415db4a91925132072d72022-12-21T19:06:18ZengKorean Spine SocietyAsian Spine Journal1976-19021976-78462020-04-0114217718410.31616/asj.2019.01271133The Prevalence and Risk Factors for S2 Alar-Iliac Screw Loosening with a Minimum 2-Year Follow-upHiroaki Nakashima0Tokumi Kanemura1Kotaro Satake2Kenyu Ito3Yoshimoto Ishikawa4Jun Ouchida5Naoki Segi6Hidetoshi Yamaguchi7Shiro Imagama8 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Konan Kosei Hospital, Konan, Japan Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Konan Kosei Hospital, Konan, Japan Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Konan Kosei Hospital, Konan, Japan Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Konan Kosei Hospital, Konan, Japan Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Konan Kosei Hospital, Konan, Japan Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Konan Kosei Hospital, Konan, Japan Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, JapanStudy Design A retrospective cohort study. Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence and risk factors for S2 alar-iliac (SAI) screw loosening following lumbosacral fixation, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Overview of Literature Although SAI screws allow surgeons to perform lumbosacral fixation with a low profile and enhanced biomechanical strength, screw loosening following surgery can occur in some cases. However, few studies have investigated the prevalence and risk factors for SAI screw loosening. Methods This retrospective study included 35 patients (mean age, 72.8±8.0 years; male, 10; female, 25) who underwent lumbosacral fixation using SAI screws with at least 2 years of follow-up. SAI screw loosening and L5–S bony fusion were assessed using computed tomography. The period for which the screws appeared loose and the risk factors for SAI screw loosening were investigated 2 years after surgery. Results A total of 70 SAI screws and 70 S1 pedicle screws were inserted. Loosening was observed 0.5, 1, and 2 years after surgery in 17 (24.3%), 35 (50.0%), and 35 (50.0%) SAI screws, respectively. Bony fusion rate at L5–S was significantly lower in patients with SAI screw loosening than in those without screw loosening (65.0% vs. 93.3%, p =0.048). The score for SAI screw contact with the iliac cortical bone and the bony fusion rate at L5–S were significantly lower in the loosening group than in the non-loosening group (1.8±0.5 vs. 2.2±0.3, p <0.001, respectively). Postoperative pelvic incidence–lumbar lordosis was significantly higher in the loosening group than in the non-loosening group (7.9°±15.4° vs. 0.5°±8.7°, p =0.02, respectively). Conclusions SAI screw loosening is closely correlated with pseudoarthrosis at L5–S. Appropriate screw insertion and optimal lumbar lordosis restoration are important to prevent postoperative complications related to SAI screws.http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-2019-0127.pdfs2 alar-iliac screwbony fusionscrew looseningrisk factors
spellingShingle Hiroaki Nakashima
Tokumi Kanemura
Kotaro Satake
Kenyu Ito
Yoshimoto Ishikawa
Jun Ouchida
Naoki Segi
Hidetoshi Yamaguchi
Shiro Imagama
The Prevalence and Risk Factors for S2 Alar-Iliac Screw Loosening with a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up
Asian Spine Journal
s2 alar-iliac screw
bony fusion
screw loosening
risk factors
title The Prevalence and Risk Factors for S2 Alar-Iliac Screw Loosening with a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up
title_full The Prevalence and Risk Factors for S2 Alar-Iliac Screw Loosening with a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up
title_fullStr The Prevalence and Risk Factors for S2 Alar-Iliac Screw Loosening with a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up
title_full_unstemmed The Prevalence and Risk Factors for S2 Alar-Iliac Screw Loosening with a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up
title_short The Prevalence and Risk Factors for S2 Alar-Iliac Screw Loosening with a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up
title_sort prevalence and risk factors for s2 alar iliac screw loosening with a minimum 2 year follow up
topic s2 alar-iliac screw
bony fusion
screw loosening
risk factors
url http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-2019-0127.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hiroakinakashima theprevalenceandriskfactorsfors2alariliacscrewlooseningwithaminimum2yearfollowup
AT tokumikanemura theprevalenceandriskfactorsfors2alariliacscrewlooseningwithaminimum2yearfollowup
AT kotarosatake theprevalenceandriskfactorsfors2alariliacscrewlooseningwithaminimum2yearfollowup
AT kenyuito theprevalenceandriskfactorsfors2alariliacscrewlooseningwithaminimum2yearfollowup
AT yoshimotoishikawa theprevalenceandriskfactorsfors2alariliacscrewlooseningwithaminimum2yearfollowup
AT junouchida theprevalenceandriskfactorsfors2alariliacscrewlooseningwithaminimum2yearfollowup
AT naokisegi theprevalenceandriskfactorsfors2alariliacscrewlooseningwithaminimum2yearfollowup
AT hidetoshiyamaguchi theprevalenceandriskfactorsfors2alariliacscrewlooseningwithaminimum2yearfollowup
AT shiroimagama theprevalenceandriskfactorsfors2alariliacscrewlooseningwithaminimum2yearfollowup
AT hiroakinakashima prevalenceandriskfactorsfors2alariliacscrewlooseningwithaminimum2yearfollowup
AT tokumikanemura prevalenceandriskfactorsfors2alariliacscrewlooseningwithaminimum2yearfollowup
AT kotarosatake prevalenceandriskfactorsfors2alariliacscrewlooseningwithaminimum2yearfollowup
AT kenyuito prevalenceandriskfactorsfors2alariliacscrewlooseningwithaminimum2yearfollowup
AT yoshimotoishikawa prevalenceandriskfactorsfors2alariliacscrewlooseningwithaminimum2yearfollowup
AT junouchida prevalenceandriskfactorsfors2alariliacscrewlooseningwithaminimum2yearfollowup
AT naokisegi prevalenceandriskfactorsfors2alariliacscrewlooseningwithaminimum2yearfollowup
AT hidetoshiyamaguchi prevalenceandriskfactorsfors2alariliacscrewlooseningwithaminimum2yearfollowup
AT shiroimagama prevalenceandriskfactorsfors2alariliacscrewlooseningwithaminimum2yearfollowup