The Failure to Protect Pregnant Pretrial Detainees

Pregnant individuals face substantial risks of serious harm when detained while awaiting trial.  Women and girls make up the fastest-growing population of incarcerated people in the United States. Disproportionately of color, many of these women and girls are confined pretrial simply because they ca...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Joella Adia Jones
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Columbia University Libraries 2020-05-01
Series:Columbia Journal of Race and Law
Online Access:https://journals.library.columbia.edu/SALT/article/domains-and-directions-in-tblt/index.php/cjrl/article/view/6115
_version_ 1811284423855833088
author Joella Adia Jones
author_facet Joella Adia Jones
author_sort Joella Adia Jones
collection DOAJ
description Pregnant individuals face substantial risks of serious harm when detained while awaiting trial.  Women and girls make up the fastest-growing population of incarcerated people in the United States. Disproportionately of color, many of these women and girls are confined pretrial simply because they cannot afford cash bail.             In 2015, the Supreme Court held in Kingsley v. Hendrickson that a pretrial detainee’s failure to protect claim should be governed by an objective deliberate indifference standard rather than the subjective standard applied to convicted prisoners asserting Eighth Amendment violations. In Darnell v. Pineiro, the Second Circuit extended the objective deliberate indifference standard for pretrial detainee failure to protect claims beyond Kingsley’s context of excessive force.             This Note considers how the Second Circuit’s holding in Darnell v. Pineiro may provide a relief framework for pregnant pretrial detainees suffering Fourteenth Amendment violations. It is impossible for pregnant detainees to be protected from substantial risks of serious harm while detained. Applying an objective deliberate indifference standard should result in successful failure to protect claims brought by pregnant pretrial detainees in the Second Circuit.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T02:28:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-597d0b73969948d59f927b3ed7d77d65
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2155-2401
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T02:28:24Z
publishDate 2020-05-01
publisher Columbia University Libraries
record_format Article
series Columbia Journal of Race and Law
spelling doaj.art-597d0b73969948d59f927b3ed7d77d652022-12-22T03:06:41ZengColumbia University LibrariesColumbia Journal of Race and Law2155-24012020-05-01102The Failure to Protect Pregnant Pretrial DetaineesJoella Adia Jones Pregnant individuals face substantial risks of serious harm when detained while awaiting trial.  Women and girls make up the fastest-growing population of incarcerated people in the United States. Disproportionately of color, many of these women and girls are confined pretrial simply because they cannot afford cash bail.             In 2015, the Supreme Court held in Kingsley v. Hendrickson that a pretrial detainee’s failure to protect claim should be governed by an objective deliberate indifference standard rather than the subjective standard applied to convicted prisoners asserting Eighth Amendment violations. In Darnell v. Pineiro, the Second Circuit extended the objective deliberate indifference standard for pretrial detainee failure to protect claims beyond Kingsley’s context of excessive force.             This Note considers how the Second Circuit’s holding in Darnell v. Pineiro may provide a relief framework for pregnant pretrial detainees suffering Fourteenth Amendment violations. It is impossible for pregnant detainees to be protected from substantial risks of serious harm while detained. Applying an objective deliberate indifference standard should result in successful failure to protect claims brought by pregnant pretrial detainees in the Second Circuit.https://journals.library.columbia.edu/SALT/article/domains-and-directions-in-tblt/index.php/cjrl/article/view/6115
spellingShingle Joella Adia Jones
The Failure to Protect Pregnant Pretrial Detainees
Columbia Journal of Race and Law
title The Failure to Protect Pregnant Pretrial Detainees
title_full The Failure to Protect Pregnant Pretrial Detainees
title_fullStr The Failure to Protect Pregnant Pretrial Detainees
title_full_unstemmed The Failure to Protect Pregnant Pretrial Detainees
title_short The Failure to Protect Pregnant Pretrial Detainees
title_sort failure to protect pregnant pretrial detainees
url https://journals.library.columbia.edu/SALT/article/domains-and-directions-in-tblt/index.php/cjrl/article/view/6115
work_keys_str_mv AT joellaadiajones thefailuretoprotectpregnantpretrialdetainees
AT joellaadiajones failuretoprotectpregnantpretrialdetainees