Case relations vs. semantic roles
The author understands the “case” as a semantically motivated syntactic relation between the predicate and its implied argument. The semantic motivation of the relation means that the semantic role of the respective argument is coded in the semantic structure of the controlling predicate....
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Institute for the Serbian Language, Belgrade
2016-01-01
|
| Series: | Južnoslovenski Filolog |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0350-185X/2016/0350-185X1604027T.pdf |
| _version_ | 1818172273585029120 |
|---|---|
| author | Topolińska Zuzanna V. |
| author_facet | Topolińska Zuzanna V. |
| author_sort | Topolińska Zuzanna V. |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The author understands the “case” as a semantically motivated syntactic
relation between the predicate and its implied argument. The semantic
motivation of the relation means that the semantic role of the respective
argument is coded in the semantic structure of the controlling predicate.
Traditional adverbal cases such as Nominative, Dative, Accusative,
Instrumental, Locative imply primarily arguments functioning as agent (N),
addressee/beneficient (D), object (A), accompanying factor (I), location (L)
- the above labels should be understood as generalized semantic roles. The
set of concrete roles is open and it is impossible and unnecessary to compile
a universal inventory of semantic roles. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-11T19:10:00Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-597dc169dc0d429f9dbb89c1425fd5a5 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0350-185X 2406-0763 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-11T19:10:00Z |
| publishDate | 2016-01-01 |
| publisher | Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Institute for the Serbian Language, Belgrade |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Južnoslovenski Filolog |
| spelling | doaj.art-597dc169dc0d429f9dbb89c1425fd5a52022-12-22T00:53:47ZengSerbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Institute for the Serbian Language, BelgradeJužnoslovenski Filolog0350-185X2406-07632016-01-01723-4273310.2298/JFI1604027T0350-185X1604027TCase relations vs. semantic rolesTopolińska Zuzanna V.0Makedonska akademija nauka i umetnosti, Skoplje, MakedonijaThe author understands the “case” as a semantically motivated syntactic relation between the predicate and its implied argument. The semantic motivation of the relation means that the semantic role of the respective argument is coded in the semantic structure of the controlling predicate. Traditional adverbal cases such as Nominative, Dative, Accusative, Instrumental, Locative imply primarily arguments functioning as agent (N), addressee/beneficient (D), object (A), accompanying factor (I), location (L) - the above labels should be understood as generalized semantic roles. The set of concrete roles is open and it is impossible and unnecessary to compile a universal inventory of semantic roles.http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0350-185X/2016/0350-185X1604027T.pdfcasepropositiongrammatical categorysemantic category |
| spellingShingle | Topolińska Zuzanna V. Case relations vs. semantic roles Južnoslovenski Filolog case proposition grammatical category semantic category |
| title | Case relations vs. semantic roles |
| title_full | Case relations vs. semantic roles |
| title_fullStr | Case relations vs. semantic roles |
| title_full_unstemmed | Case relations vs. semantic roles |
| title_short | Case relations vs. semantic roles |
| title_sort | case relations vs semantic roles |
| topic | case proposition grammatical category semantic category |
| url | http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0350-185X/2016/0350-185X1604027T.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT topolinskazuzannav caserelationsvssemanticroles |