Ring distributions leading to species formation: a global topographic analysis of geographic barriers associated with ring species

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In the mid 20<sup>th </sup>century, Ernst Mayr and Theodosius Dobzhansky championed the significance of circular overlaps or ring species as the perfect demonstration of speciation, yet in the over 50 years since, only a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Monahan William B, Pereira Ricardo J, Wake David B
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-03-01
Series:BMC Biology
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7007/10/20
_version_ 1818113551392309248
author Monahan William B
Pereira Ricardo J
Wake David B
author_facet Monahan William B
Pereira Ricardo J
Wake David B
author_sort Monahan William B
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In the mid 20<sup>th </sup>century, Ernst Mayr and Theodosius Dobzhansky championed the significance of circular overlaps or ring species as the perfect demonstration of speciation, yet in the over 50 years since, only a handful of such taxa are known. We developed a topographic model to evaluate whether the geographic barriers that favor processes leading to ring species are common or rare, and to predict where other candidate ring barriers might be found.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Of the 952,147 geographic barriers identified on the planet, only about 1% are topographically similar to barriers associated with known ring taxa, with most of the likely candidates occurring in under-studied parts of the world (for example, marine environments, tropical latitudes). Predicted barriers separate into two distinct categories: (i) single cohesive barriers (< 50,000 km<sup>2</sup>), associated with taxa that differentiate at smaller spatial scales (salamander: <it>Ensatina eschscholtzii</it>; tree: <it>Acacia karroo</it>); and (ii) composite barriers - formed by groups of barriers (each 184,000 to 1.7 million km<sup>2</sup>) in close geographic proximity (totaling 1.9 to 2.3 million km<sup>2</sup>) - associated with taxa that differentiate at larger spatial scales (birds: <it>Phylloscopus trochiloide</it>s and <it>Larus </it>(sp. <it>argentatus </it>and <it>fuscus</it>)). When evaluated globally, we find a large number of cohesive barriers that are topographically similar to those associated with known ring taxa. Yet, compared to cohesive barriers, an order of magnitude fewer composite barriers are similar to those that favor ring divergence in species with higher dispersal.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>While these findings confirm that the topographic conditions that favor evolutionary processes leading to ring speciation are, in fact, rare, they also suggest that many understudied natural systems could provide valuable demonstrations of continuous divergence towards the formation of new species. Distinct advantages of the model are that it (i) requires no <it>a priori </it>information on the relative importance of features that define barriers, (ii) can be replicated using any kind of continuously distributed environmental variable, and (iii) generates spatially explicit hypotheses of geographic species formation. The methods developed here - combined with study of the geographical ecology and genetics of taxa in their environments - should enable recognition of ring species phenomena throughout the world.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-11T03:36:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-597fb8b7a53843f9b377bee80b02b07a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1741-7007
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T03:36:38Z
publishDate 2012-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Biology
spelling doaj.art-597fb8b7a53843f9b377bee80b02b07a2022-12-22T01:22:13ZengBMCBMC Biology1741-70072012-03-011012010.1186/1741-7007-10-20Ring distributions leading to species formation: a global topographic analysis of geographic barriers associated with ring speciesMonahan William BPereira Ricardo JWake David B<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In the mid 20<sup>th </sup>century, Ernst Mayr and Theodosius Dobzhansky championed the significance of circular overlaps or ring species as the perfect demonstration of speciation, yet in the over 50 years since, only a handful of such taxa are known. We developed a topographic model to evaluate whether the geographic barriers that favor processes leading to ring species are common or rare, and to predict where other candidate ring barriers might be found.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Of the 952,147 geographic barriers identified on the planet, only about 1% are topographically similar to barriers associated with known ring taxa, with most of the likely candidates occurring in under-studied parts of the world (for example, marine environments, tropical latitudes). Predicted barriers separate into two distinct categories: (i) single cohesive barriers (< 50,000 km<sup>2</sup>), associated with taxa that differentiate at smaller spatial scales (salamander: <it>Ensatina eschscholtzii</it>; tree: <it>Acacia karroo</it>); and (ii) composite barriers - formed by groups of barriers (each 184,000 to 1.7 million km<sup>2</sup>) in close geographic proximity (totaling 1.9 to 2.3 million km<sup>2</sup>) - associated with taxa that differentiate at larger spatial scales (birds: <it>Phylloscopus trochiloide</it>s and <it>Larus </it>(sp. <it>argentatus </it>and <it>fuscus</it>)). When evaluated globally, we find a large number of cohesive barriers that are topographically similar to those associated with known ring taxa. Yet, compared to cohesive barriers, an order of magnitude fewer composite barriers are similar to those that favor ring divergence in species with higher dispersal.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>While these findings confirm that the topographic conditions that favor evolutionary processes leading to ring speciation are, in fact, rare, they also suggest that many understudied natural systems could provide valuable demonstrations of continuous divergence towards the formation of new species. Distinct advantages of the model are that it (i) requires no <it>a priori </it>information on the relative importance of features that define barriers, (ii) can be replicated using any kind of continuously distributed environmental variable, and (iii) generates spatially explicit hypotheses of geographic species formation. The methods developed here - combined with study of the geographical ecology and genetics of taxa in their environments - should enable recognition of ring species phenomena throughout the world.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7007/10/20
spellingShingle Monahan William B
Pereira Ricardo J
Wake David B
Ring distributions leading to species formation: a global topographic analysis of geographic barriers associated with ring species
BMC Biology
title Ring distributions leading to species formation: a global topographic analysis of geographic barriers associated with ring species
title_full Ring distributions leading to species formation: a global topographic analysis of geographic barriers associated with ring species
title_fullStr Ring distributions leading to species formation: a global topographic analysis of geographic barriers associated with ring species
title_full_unstemmed Ring distributions leading to species formation: a global topographic analysis of geographic barriers associated with ring species
title_short Ring distributions leading to species formation: a global topographic analysis of geographic barriers associated with ring species
title_sort ring distributions leading to species formation a global topographic analysis of geographic barriers associated with ring species
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7007/10/20
work_keys_str_mv AT monahanwilliamb ringdistributionsleadingtospeciesformationaglobaltopographicanalysisofgeographicbarriersassociatedwithringspecies
AT pereiraricardoj ringdistributionsleadingtospeciesformationaglobaltopographicanalysisofgeographicbarriersassociatedwithringspecies
AT wakedavidb ringdistributionsleadingtospeciesformationaglobaltopographicanalysisofgeographicbarriersassociatedwithringspecies