Protocol for treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures; a systematic review with network meta-analysis

Abstract Background Achilles tendon ruptures are a common injury and are increasing in incidence. Several management strategies exist for both non-operative and operative care, with each strategy offering unique risks and benefits. Traditional pairwise meta-analyses have been performed to compare ma...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brad Meulenkamp, Dawn Stacey, Dean Fergusson, Brian Hutton, Risa Shorr MLIS, Ian D. Graham
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-12-01
Series:Systematic Reviews
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13643-018-0912-5
_version_ 1818109634729213952
author Brad Meulenkamp
Dawn Stacey
Dean Fergusson
Brian Hutton
Risa Shorr MLIS
Ian D. Graham
author_facet Brad Meulenkamp
Dawn Stacey
Dean Fergusson
Brian Hutton
Risa Shorr MLIS
Ian D. Graham
author_sort Brad Meulenkamp
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Achilles tendon ruptures are a common injury and are increasing in incidence. Several management strategies exist for both non-operative and operative care, with each strategy offering unique risks and benefits. Traditional pairwise meta-analyses have been performed to compare management strategies; however, all treatment options have never been integrated in a single analysis. Network meta-analysis (NMA) is a generalization of pairwise meta-analysis, which allows for the comparison of multiple interventions based on all available direct and indirect evidence. The objectives of this review are to synthesize the evidence on the management options for acute Achilles tendon rupture and identify which treatment gives the best functional outcomes. Methods A systematic review with NMA is planned. An electronic literature search will be performed in conjunction with an experienced information specialist in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We will include randomized controlled trials with a minimum 6-month follow-up. Two independent reviewers will screen citations for eligibility, extract study data, and perform risk of bias assessments. The primary outcome will be disease-specific functional outcome scores (AOFAS, Leppilahti, modified Leppilahti) at 1 year. Secondary outcomes will include complications (re-rupture, sural nerve injury, wound complications, deep infection, secondary surgeries), strength, range of motion, return to work, return to sport, and quality-of-life measures (including the SF-36 questionnaire). Traditional pairwise meta-analyses will be performed for all direct comparisons where evidence is available, and NMAs will subsequently be performed where possible to compare all management strategies. Discussion The data generated from this review will provide health-care providers with a clear evidence synthesis of all Achilles tendon rupture management strategies. Additionally, these data will be incorporated into the development of a patient decision aid to assist patients and clinicians in making a preference-based decision when faced with an Achilles tendon rupture. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42018093033.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T02:34:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5982e8fefd4d4ecab9440d177ae5c237
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2046-4053
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T02:34:23Z
publishDate 2018-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Systematic Reviews
spelling doaj.art-5982e8fefd4d4ecab9440d177ae5c2372022-12-22T01:23:45ZengBMCSystematic Reviews2046-40532018-12-01711710.1186/s13643-018-0912-5Protocol for treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures; a systematic review with network meta-analysisBrad Meulenkamp0Dawn Stacey1Dean Fergusson2Brian Hutton3Risa Shorr MLIS4Ian D. Graham5Faculty of Medicine, University of OttawaFaculty of Health Sciences, Centre for Practice-Changing Research, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of OttawaDepartment of Medicine, Centre for Practice-Changing Research Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of OttawaClinical Epidemiology Program, Centre for Practice-Changing Research, The Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteThe Ottawa HospitalSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health; Clinical Epidemiology Program, Centre for Practice-Changing, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Research, University of OttawaAbstract Background Achilles tendon ruptures are a common injury and are increasing in incidence. Several management strategies exist for both non-operative and operative care, with each strategy offering unique risks and benefits. Traditional pairwise meta-analyses have been performed to compare management strategies; however, all treatment options have never been integrated in a single analysis. Network meta-analysis (NMA) is a generalization of pairwise meta-analysis, which allows for the comparison of multiple interventions based on all available direct and indirect evidence. The objectives of this review are to synthesize the evidence on the management options for acute Achilles tendon rupture and identify which treatment gives the best functional outcomes. Methods A systematic review with NMA is planned. An electronic literature search will be performed in conjunction with an experienced information specialist in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We will include randomized controlled trials with a minimum 6-month follow-up. Two independent reviewers will screen citations for eligibility, extract study data, and perform risk of bias assessments. The primary outcome will be disease-specific functional outcome scores (AOFAS, Leppilahti, modified Leppilahti) at 1 year. Secondary outcomes will include complications (re-rupture, sural nerve injury, wound complications, deep infection, secondary surgeries), strength, range of motion, return to work, return to sport, and quality-of-life measures (including the SF-36 questionnaire). Traditional pairwise meta-analyses will be performed for all direct comparisons where evidence is available, and NMAs will subsequently be performed where possible to compare all management strategies. Discussion The data generated from this review will provide health-care providers with a clear evidence synthesis of all Achilles tendon rupture management strategies. Additionally, these data will be incorporated into the development of a patient decision aid to assist patients and clinicians in making a preference-based decision when faced with an Achilles tendon rupture. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42018093033.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13643-018-0912-5Achilles tendon ruptureSystematic reviewNetwork meta-analysisOrthopedicsSurgeryPhysiotherapy
spellingShingle Brad Meulenkamp
Dawn Stacey
Dean Fergusson
Brian Hutton
Risa Shorr MLIS
Ian D. Graham
Protocol for treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures; a systematic review with network meta-analysis
Systematic Reviews
Achilles tendon rupture
Systematic review
Network meta-analysis
Orthopedics
Surgery
Physiotherapy
title Protocol for treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures; a systematic review with network meta-analysis
title_full Protocol for treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures; a systematic review with network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Protocol for treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures; a systematic review with network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Protocol for treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures; a systematic review with network meta-analysis
title_short Protocol for treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures; a systematic review with network meta-analysis
title_sort protocol for treatment of achilles tendon ruptures a systematic review with network meta analysis
topic Achilles tendon rupture
Systematic review
Network meta-analysis
Orthopedics
Surgery
Physiotherapy
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13643-018-0912-5
work_keys_str_mv AT bradmeulenkamp protocolfortreatmentofachillestendonrupturesasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis
AT dawnstacey protocolfortreatmentofachillestendonrupturesasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis
AT deanfergusson protocolfortreatmentofachillestendonrupturesasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis
AT brianhutton protocolfortreatmentofachillestendonrupturesasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis
AT risashorrmlis protocolfortreatmentofachillestendonrupturesasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis
AT iandgraham protocolfortreatmentofachillestendonrupturesasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis