Comparison of the Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Pectoral versus Erector Spinae Plane Blocks for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Introduction: Postmastectomy pain is more common following carcinoma breast surgery. Preventive analgesia for breast carcinoma includes administration of local infiltration or regional anaesthesia in the form of a paravertebral block, epidural, pectoral nerve block or intercostal block. Interfascial...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: V Bhavani, Sangeeta Dhanger, Namrata Gupta, I Joseph Raajesh, Saravanan Pandian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited 2022-08-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jcdr.net/articles/PDF/16686/55835_F[SK]_PF1(AG_SS)_PFA(AG_KM)_PN(KM).pdf
_version_ 1811176890512179200
author V Bhavani
Sangeeta Dhanger
Namrata Gupta
I Joseph Raajesh
Saravanan Pandian
author_facet V Bhavani
Sangeeta Dhanger
Namrata Gupta
I Joseph Raajesh
Saravanan Pandian
author_sort V Bhavani
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Postmastectomy pain is more common following carcinoma breast surgery. Preventive analgesia for breast carcinoma includes administration of local infiltration or regional anaesthesia in the form of a paravertebral block, epidural, pectoral nerve block or intercostal block. Interfascial blocks, such as ultrasound guided pectoral nerve (PECS II) and Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block have been shown to provide effective analgesia for mastectomy surgeries. Aim: To compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of PECSII block and ESP block following mastectomy surgeries. Materials and Methods: The present study was a double-blinded randomised controlled study. Patients scheduled for an elective unilateral modified radical mastectomy surgery of age 18-70 years, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II, were enrolled in the study. Sixty patients (ASA I-II) were divided into two groups (30 in the PECS II group and 30 in the ESP group). The patients received respective blocks under ultrasound guidance after general anaesthesia. The primary outcome measured was the time of first request analgesia between groups. The secondary outcomes were postoperative Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at eight different time-points (0.5, 1st, 2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th 12th and 24th hour) and intraoperative fentanyl requirement and haemodynamics (heart rate and mean arterial pressure). Total postoperative intravenous paracetamol consumption and rescue analgesic requirement in the first 24 hours postoperatively were noted. Statistical analysis was conducted by using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0. Pearson’s Chi-square test was performed to compare ratios, and categorical variables were compared using Fisher’s exact test. A p-value value <0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Results: The time of first request analgesia was prolonged and significant in ESP block (255.5±48.76 minutes) than PEC II (197.5±31.35 minutes) (p=0.000347). In the postoperative ward, NRS scores at the 30th min, first and second hour were significantly lower in ESP block than PECS II group (2.3±0.4 vs. 5.2±0.8; 3.2±0.4 vs. 4.4±0.3, 3.7±0.4 vs. 5.2±0.4); p=0.041 p=0.047, p=0.037, respectively. From the second postoperative hour to the end of the observation period, there were no significant changes in NRS scores among groups. Postoperative paracetamol consumption was significantly higher in PECS II than ESPB (1.25±0.5 grams vs 2.33±1.2 grams, p<0.043824).There was no change in intraoperative fentanyl consumption and haemodynamics between groups. Conclusion: The ESP block had better pain control, reduced postoperative pain scores and rescue analgesia than PECS II when given as preventive analgesia in mastectomy surgeries.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T20:00:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5987e44672384291a444ef24addf6f08
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2249-782X
0973-709X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T20:00:21Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
spelling doaj.art-5987e44672384291a444ef24addf6f082023-01-27T08:45:24ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2022-08-01168UC05UC0810.7860/JCDR/2022/55835.16686Comparison of the Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Pectoral versus Erector Spinae Plane Blocks for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy: A Randomised Controlled TrialV Bhavani0Sangeeta Dhanger1Namrata Gupta2I Joseph Raajesh3Saravanan Pandian4Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Indira Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, India.Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Indira Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, India.Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Science, Ambala, Haryana, India.Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Indira Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, India.Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Indira Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, India.Introduction: Postmastectomy pain is more common following carcinoma breast surgery. Preventive analgesia for breast carcinoma includes administration of local infiltration or regional anaesthesia in the form of a paravertebral block, epidural, pectoral nerve block or intercostal block. Interfascial blocks, such as ultrasound guided pectoral nerve (PECS II) and Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block have been shown to provide effective analgesia for mastectomy surgeries. Aim: To compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of PECSII block and ESP block following mastectomy surgeries. Materials and Methods: The present study was a double-blinded randomised controlled study. Patients scheduled for an elective unilateral modified radical mastectomy surgery of age 18-70 years, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II, were enrolled in the study. Sixty patients (ASA I-II) were divided into two groups (30 in the PECS II group and 30 in the ESP group). The patients received respective blocks under ultrasound guidance after general anaesthesia. The primary outcome measured was the time of first request analgesia between groups. The secondary outcomes were postoperative Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at eight different time-points (0.5, 1st, 2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th 12th and 24th hour) and intraoperative fentanyl requirement and haemodynamics (heart rate and mean arterial pressure). Total postoperative intravenous paracetamol consumption and rescue analgesic requirement in the first 24 hours postoperatively were noted. Statistical analysis was conducted by using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0. Pearson’s Chi-square test was performed to compare ratios, and categorical variables were compared using Fisher’s exact test. A p-value value <0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Results: The time of first request analgesia was prolonged and significant in ESP block (255.5±48.76 minutes) than PEC II (197.5±31.35 minutes) (p=0.000347). In the postoperative ward, NRS scores at the 30th min, first and second hour were significantly lower in ESP block than PECS II group (2.3±0.4 vs. 5.2±0.8; 3.2±0.4 vs. 4.4±0.3, 3.7±0.4 vs. 5.2±0.4); p=0.041 p=0.047, p=0.037, respectively. From the second postoperative hour to the end of the observation period, there were no significant changes in NRS scores among groups. Postoperative paracetamol consumption was significantly higher in PECS II than ESPB (1.25±0.5 grams vs 2.33±1.2 grams, p<0.043824).There was no change in intraoperative fentanyl consumption and haemodynamics between groups. Conclusion: The ESP block had better pain control, reduced postoperative pain scores and rescue analgesia than PECS II when given as preventive analgesia in mastectomy surgeries.https://www.jcdr.net/articles/PDF/16686/55835_F[SK]_PF1(AG_SS)_PFA(AG_KM)_PN(KM).pdfhaemodynamicsinterfascial blocksparacetamolpostoperative painrescue analgesia
spellingShingle V Bhavani
Sangeeta Dhanger
Namrata Gupta
I Joseph Raajesh
Saravanan Pandian
Comparison of the Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Pectoral versus Erector Spinae Plane Blocks for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy: A Randomised Controlled Trial
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
haemodynamics
interfascial blocks
paracetamol
postoperative pain
rescue analgesia
title Comparison of the Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Pectoral versus Erector Spinae Plane Blocks for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy: A Randomised Controlled Trial
title_full Comparison of the Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Pectoral versus Erector Spinae Plane Blocks for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy: A Randomised Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Comparison of the Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Pectoral versus Erector Spinae Plane Blocks for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy: A Randomised Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Pectoral versus Erector Spinae Plane Blocks for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy: A Randomised Controlled Trial
title_short Comparison of the Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Pectoral versus Erector Spinae Plane Blocks for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy: A Randomised Controlled Trial
title_sort comparison of the efficacy of ultrasound guided pectoral versus erector spinae plane blocks for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy a randomised controlled trial
topic haemodynamics
interfascial blocks
paracetamol
postoperative pain
rescue analgesia
url https://www.jcdr.net/articles/PDF/16686/55835_F[SK]_PF1(AG_SS)_PFA(AG_KM)_PN(KM).pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT vbhavani comparisonoftheefficacyofultrasoundguidedpectoralversuserectorspinaeplaneblocksforpostoperativeanalgesiainpatientsundergoingmodifiedradicalmastectomyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sangeetadhanger comparisonoftheefficacyofultrasoundguidedpectoralversuserectorspinaeplaneblocksforpostoperativeanalgesiainpatientsundergoingmodifiedradicalmastectomyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT namratagupta comparisonoftheefficacyofultrasoundguidedpectoralversuserectorspinaeplaneblocksforpostoperativeanalgesiainpatientsundergoingmodifiedradicalmastectomyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ijosephraajesh comparisonoftheefficacyofultrasoundguidedpectoralversuserectorspinaeplaneblocksforpostoperativeanalgesiainpatientsundergoingmodifiedradicalmastectomyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT saravananpandian comparisonoftheefficacyofultrasoundguidedpectoralversuserectorspinaeplaneblocksforpostoperativeanalgesiainpatientsundergoingmodifiedradicalmastectomyarandomisedcontrolledtrial