Diagnostic performance of eNose technology in COVID-19 patients after hospitalization

Abstract Background Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) produced by human cells reflect metabolic and pathophysiological processes which can be detected with the use of electronic nose (eNose) technology. Analysis of exhaled breath may potentially play an important role in diagnosing COVID-19 and stra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: B. F.M. van Raaij, J. D. Veltman, J. F. Hameete, J. L. Stöger, J. J.M. Geelhoed
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-04-01
Series:BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-023-02407-6
_version_ 1797841209942605824
author B. F.M. van Raaij
J. D. Veltman
J. F. Hameete
J. L. Stöger
J. J.M. Geelhoed
author_facet B. F.M. van Raaij
J. D. Veltman
J. F. Hameete
J. L. Stöger
J. J.M. Geelhoed
author_sort B. F.M. van Raaij
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) produced by human cells reflect metabolic and pathophysiological processes which can be detected with the use of electronic nose (eNose) technology. Analysis of exhaled breath may potentially play an important role in diagnosing COVID-19 and stratification of patients based on pulmonary function or chest CT. Methods Breath profiles of COVID-19 patients were collected with an eNose device (SpiroNose) 3 months after discharge from the Leiden University Medical Centre and matched with breath profiles from healthy individuals for analysis. Principal component analysis was performed with leave-one-out cross validation and visualised with receiver operating characteristics. COVID-19 patients were stratified in subgroups with a normal pulmonary diffusion capacity versus patients with an impaired pulmonary diffusion capacity (DLCOc < 80% of predicted) and in subgroups with a normal chest CT versus patients with COVID-19 related chest CT abnormalities. Results The breath profiles of 135 COVID-19 patients were analysed and matched with 174 healthy controls. The SpiroNose differentiated between COVID-19 after hospitalization and healthy controls with an AUC of 0.893 (95-CI, 0.851–0.934). There was no difference in VOCs patterns in subgroups of COVID-19 patients based on diffusion capacity or chest CT. Conclusions COVID-19 patients have a breath profile distinguishable from healthy individuals shortly after hospitalization which can be detected using eNose technology. This may suggest ongoing inflammation or a common repair mechanism. The eNose could not differentiate between subgroups of COVID-19 patients based on pulmonary diffusion capacity or chest CT.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T16:27:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-59913f990f944d0dad7c3d8906f62def
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2466
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T16:27:25Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Pulmonary Medicine
spelling doaj.art-59913f990f944d0dad7c3d8906f62def2023-04-23T11:08:05ZengBMCBMC Pulmonary Medicine1471-24662023-04-012311710.1186/s12890-023-02407-6Diagnostic performance of eNose technology in COVID-19 patients after hospitalizationB. F.M. van Raaij0J. D. Veltman1J. F. Hameete2J. L. Stöger3J. J.M. Geelhoed4Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Leiden University Medical CentreDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, Amsterdam University Medical CentreDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, Leiden University Medical CentreDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical CentreDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, Leiden University Medical CentreAbstract Background Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) produced by human cells reflect metabolic and pathophysiological processes which can be detected with the use of electronic nose (eNose) technology. Analysis of exhaled breath may potentially play an important role in diagnosing COVID-19 and stratification of patients based on pulmonary function or chest CT. Methods Breath profiles of COVID-19 patients were collected with an eNose device (SpiroNose) 3 months after discharge from the Leiden University Medical Centre and matched with breath profiles from healthy individuals for analysis. Principal component analysis was performed with leave-one-out cross validation and visualised with receiver operating characteristics. COVID-19 patients were stratified in subgroups with a normal pulmonary diffusion capacity versus patients with an impaired pulmonary diffusion capacity (DLCOc < 80% of predicted) and in subgroups with a normal chest CT versus patients with COVID-19 related chest CT abnormalities. Results The breath profiles of 135 COVID-19 patients were analysed and matched with 174 healthy controls. The SpiroNose differentiated between COVID-19 after hospitalization and healthy controls with an AUC of 0.893 (95-CI, 0.851–0.934). There was no difference in VOCs patterns in subgroups of COVID-19 patients based on diffusion capacity or chest CT. Conclusions COVID-19 patients have a breath profile distinguishable from healthy individuals shortly after hospitalization which can be detected using eNose technology. This may suggest ongoing inflammation or a common repair mechanism. The eNose could not differentiate between subgroups of COVID-19 patients based on pulmonary diffusion capacity or chest CT.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-023-02407-6Breath analysisCOVID-19Electronic nose technologyFollow-up
spellingShingle B. F.M. van Raaij
J. D. Veltman
J. F. Hameete
J. L. Stöger
J. J.M. Geelhoed
Diagnostic performance of eNose technology in COVID-19 patients after hospitalization
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Breath analysis
COVID-19
Electronic nose technology
Follow-up
title Diagnostic performance of eNose technology in COVID-19 patients after hospitalization
title_full Diagnostic performance of eNose technology in COVID-19 patients after hospitalization
title_fullStr Diagnostic performance of eNose technology in COVID-19 patients after hospitalization
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic performance of eNose technology in COVID-19 patients after hospitalization
title_short Diagnostic performance of eNose technology in COVID-19 patients after hospitalization
title_sort diagnostic performance of enose technology in covid 19 patients after hospitalization
topic Breath analysis
COVID-19
Electronic nose technology
Follow-up
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-023-02407-6
work_keys_str_mv AT bfmvanraaij diagnosticperformanceofenosetechnologyincovid19patientsafterhospitalization
AT jdveltman diagnosticperformanceofenosetechnologyincovid19patientsafterhospitalization
AT jfhameete diagnosticperformanceofenosetechnologyincovid19patientsafterhospitalization
AT jlstoger diagnosticperformanceofenosetechnologyincovid19patientsafterhospitalization
AT jjmgeelhoed diagnosticperformanceofenosetechnologyincovid19patientsafterhospitalization