Prevalence and profile of users and non-users of anabolic steroids among resistance training practitioners

Abstract Background To verify the prevalence and profile of users and non-users of anabolic steroid (AS) among resistance training practitioners. Methods An observational, cross-sectional survey was performed in 100 gyms in Curitiba city, involving 5773 individuals and self-administered questionnair...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ericson PEREIRA, Samuel Jorge MOYSES, Sérgio Aparecido IGNÁCIO, Daniel Komarchewski MENDES, Diego Sgarbi D. A. SILVA, Everdan CARNEIRO, Ana Maria Trindade Grégio HARDY, Edvaldo Antônio Ribeiro ROSA, Patrícia Vida Cassi BETTEGA, Aline Cristina Batista Rodrigues JOHANN
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-12-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-8004-6
_version_ 1818853194304847872
author Ericson PEREIRA
Samuel Jorge MOYSES
Sérgio Aparecido IGNÁCIO
Daniel Komarchewski MENDES
Diego Sgarbi D. A. SILVA
Everdan CARNEIRO
Ana Maria Trindade Grégio HARDY
Edvaldo Antônio Ribeiro ROSA
Patrícia Vida Cassi BETTEGA
Aline Cristina Batista Rodrigues JOHANN
author_facet Ericson PEREIRA
Samuel Jorge MOYSES
Sérgio Aparecido IGNÁCIO
Daniel Komarchewski MENDES
Diego Sgarbi D. A. SILVA
Everdan CARNEIRO
Ana Maria Trindade Grégio HARDY
Edvaldo Antônio Ribeiro ROSA
Patrícia Vida Cassi BETTEGA
Aline Cristina Batista Rodrigues JOHANN
author_sort Ericson PEREIRA
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background To verify the prevalence and profile of users and non-users of anabolic steroid (AS) among resistance training practitioners. Methods An observational, cross-sectional survey was performed in 100 gyms in Curitiba city, involving 5773 individuals and self-administered questionnaires. The chi-square and z-tests of proportions were used for comparison between the groups (p < 0.05). Results 83.2% did not use, 9.1% formerly used, 3.4% currently used, and 4.3% intended used AS. The prevalence of former or current AS users was 16.9 and 6.5% among men and women, respectively. The prevalence ratios were as follows: 1) 2.6 male users for each woman; 2) 3.3 individuals aged 30–44 years and 2.8 individuals aged 18–29 years for each individual aged over 45 years. Beginners were not interested in using AS, but individuals who had trained longer had higher prevalence of AS use. Conclusions The gym environment encouraged the use of AS owing to aesthetic appeal. Thus, suggesting the need for actions to prevent abusive use of AS considering the practitioners profile (practitioners were young, university and single).
first_indexed 2024-12-19T07:32:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-59a3938a05eb484196da8dc80d299421
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2458
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T07:32:56Z
publishDate 2019-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Public Health
spelling doaj.art-59a3938a05eb484196da8dc80d2994212022-12-21T20:30:39ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582019-12-011911810.1186/s12889-019-8004-6Prevalence and profile of users and non-users of anabolic steroids among resistance training practitionersEricson PEREIRA0Samuel Jorge MOYSES1Sérgio Aparecido IGNÁCIO2Daniel Komarchewski MENDES3Diego Sgarbi D. A. SILVA4Everdan CARNEIRO5Ana Maria Trindade Grégio HARDY6Edvaldo Antônio Ribeiro ROSA7Patrícia Vida Cassi BETTEGA8Aline Cristina Batista Rodrigues JOHANN9Graduate Program, Life Sciences School, Pontifical Catholic University of ParanaGraduate Program, Life Sciences School, Pontifical Catholic University of ParanaGraduate Program, Life Sciences School, Pontifical Catholic University of ParanaGraduate Program, Life Sciences School, Pontifical Catholic University of ParanaGraduate Program, Life Sciences School, Pontifical Catholic University of ParanaGraduate Program, Life Sciences School, Pontifical Catholic University of ParanaDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of ToledoGraduate Program, Life Sciences School, Pontifical Catholic University of ParanaGraduate Program, Life Sciences School, Pontifical Catholic University of ParanaGraduate Program, Life Sciences School, Pontifical Catholic University of ParanaAbstract Background To verify the prevalence and profile of users and non-users of anabolic steroid (AS) among resistance training practitioners. Methods An observational, cross-sectional survey was performed in 100 gyms in Curitiba city, involving 5773 individuals and self-administered questionnaires. The chi-square and z-tests of proportions were used for comparison between the groups (p < 0.05). Results 83.2% did not use, 9.1% formerly used, 3.4% currently used, and 4.3% intended used AS. The prevalence of former or current AS users was 16.9 and 6.5% among men and women, respectively. The prevalence ratios were as follows: 1) 2.6 male users for each woman; 2) 3.3 individuals aged 30–44 years and 2.8 individuals aged 18–29 years for each individual aged over 45 years. Beginners were not interested in using AS, but individuals who had trained longer had higher prevalence of AS use. Conclusions The gym environment encouraged the use of AS owing to aesthetic appeal. Thus, suggesting the need for actions to prevent abusive use of AS considering the practitioners profile (practitioners were young, university and single).https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-8004-6Anabolic agentsPrevalenceResistance trainingCross-sectional studies
spellingShingle Ericson PEREIRA
Samuel Jorge MOYSES
Sérgio Aparecido IGNÁCIO
Daniel Komarchewski MENDES
Diego Sgarbi D. A. SILVA
Everdan CARNEIRO
Ana Maria Trindade Grégio HARDY
Edvaldo Antônio Ribeiro ROSA
Patrícia Vida Cassi BETTEGA
Aline Cristina Batista Rodrigues JOHANN
Prevalence and profile of users and non-users of anabolic steroids among resistance training practitioners
BMC Public Health
Anabolic agents
Prevalence
Resistance training
Cross-sectional studies
title Prevalence and profile of users and non-users of anabolic steroids among resistance training practitioners
title_full Prevalence and profile of users and non-users of anabolic steroids among resistance training practitioners
title_fullStr Prevalence and profile of users and non-users of anabolic steroids among resistance training practitioners
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence and profile of users and non-users of anabolic steroids among resistance training practitioners
title_short Prevalence and profile of users and non-users of anabolic steroids among resistance training practitioners
title_sort prevalence and profile of users and non users of anabolic steroids among resistance training practitioners
topic Anabolic agents
Prevalence
Resistance training
Cross-sectional studies
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-8004-6
work_keys_str_mv AT ericsonpereira prevalenceandprofileofusersandnonusersofanabolicsteroidsamongresistancetrainingpractitioners
AT samueljorgemoyses prevalenceandprofileofusersandnonusersofanabolicsteroidsamongresistancetrainingpractitioners
AT sergioaparecidoignacio prevalenceandprofileofusersandnonusersofanabolicsteroidsamongresistancetrainingpractitioners
AT danielkomarchewskimendes prevalenceandprofileofusersandnonusersofanabolicsteroidsamongresistancetrainingpractitioners
AT diegosgarbidasilva prevalenceandprofileofusersandnonusersofanabolicsteroidsamongresistancetrainingpractitioners
AT everdancarneiro prevalenceandprofileofusersandnonusersofanabolicsteroidsamongresistancetrainingpractitioners
AT anamariatrindadegregiohardy prevalenceandprofileofusersandnonusersofanabolicsteroidsamongresistancetrainingpractitioners
AT edvaldoantonioribeirorosa prevalenceandprofileofusersandnonusersofanabolicsteroidsamongresistancetrainingpractitioners
AT patriciavidacassibettega prevalenceandprofileofusersandnonusersofanabolicsteroidsamongresistancetrainingpractitioners
AT alinecristinabatistarodriguesjohann prevalenceandprofileofusersandnonusersofanabolicsteroidsamongresistancetrainingpractitioners