Methodological Issues in Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Malassezia pachydermatis

Reference methods for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts have been developed by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the European Committee on Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). These methods are intended to test the main pathogenic yeasts that cause invasive...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrea Peano, Mario Pasquetti, Paolo Tizzani, Elisa Chiavassa, Jacques Guillot, Elizabeth Johnson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-07-01
Series:Journal of Fungi
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2309-608X/3/3/37
_version_ 1819039738144751616
author Andrea Peano
Mario Pasquetti
Paolo Tizzani
Elisa Chiavassa
Jacques Guillot
Elizabeth Johnson
author_facet Andrea Peano
Mario Pasquetti
Paolo Tizzani
Elisa Chiavassa
Jacques Guillot
Elizabeth Johnson
author_sort Andrea Peano
collection DOAJ
description Reference methods for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts have been developed by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the European Committee on Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). These methods are intended to test the main pathogenic yeasts that cause invasive infections, namely Candida spp. and Cryptococcus neoformans, while testing other yeast species introduces several additional problems in standardization not addressed by these reference procedures. As a consequence, a number of procedures have been employed in the literature to test the antifungal susceptibility of Malassezia pachydermatis. This has resulted in conflicting results. The aim of the present study is to review the procedures and the technical parameters (growth media, inoculum preparation, temperature and length of incubation, method of reading) employed for susceptibility testing of M. pachydermatis, and when possible, to propose recommendations for or against their use. Such information may be useful for the future development of a reference assay.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T08:57:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-59a4ba03f30c45a08f0757d7428c5aff
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2309-608X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T08:57:58Z
publishDate 2017-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Fungi
spelling doaj.art-59a4ba03f30c45a08f0757d7428c5aff2022-12-21T19:09:30ZengMDPI AGJournal of Fungi2309-608X2017-07-01333710.3390/jof3030037jof3030037Methodological Issues in Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Malassezia pachydermatisAndrea Peano0Mario Pasquetti1Paolo Tizzani2Elisa Chiavassa3Jacques Guillot4Elizabeth Johnson5Dipartimento diScienze Veterinarie, Università di Torino, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco, ItalyDipartimento diScienze Veterinarie, Università di Torino, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco, ItalyDipartimento diScienze Veterinarie, Università di Torino, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco, ItalyDipartimento diScienze Veterinarie, Università di Torino, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco, ItalyEcole nationale Vétérinaire d’Alfort, Dynamyc Research Group, EnvA, Université, Maisons-Alfort 94700, FrancePublic Health England Mycology Reference Laboratory, Kingsdown, Bristol BS2 8EL, UKReference methods for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts have been developed by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the European Committee on Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). These methods are intended to test the main pathogenic yeasts that cause invasive infections, namely Candida spp. and Cryptococcus neoformans, while testing other yeast species introduces several additional problems in standardization not addressed by these reference procedures. As a consequence, a number of procedures have been employed in the literature to test the antifungal susceptibility of Malassezia pachydermatis. This has resulted in conflicting results. The aim of the present study is to review the procedures and the technical parameters (growth media, inoculum preparation, temperature and length of incubation, method of reading) employed for susceptibility testing of M. pachydermatis, and when possible, to propose recommendations for or against their use. Such information may be useful for the future development of a reference assay.https://www.mdpi.com/2309-608X/3/3/37Malassezia pachydermatissusceptibility testingbroth microdilutiondisk diffusionminimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)
spellingShingle Andrea Peano
Mario Pasquetti
Paolo Tizzani
Elisa Chiavassa
Jacques Guillot
Elizabeth Johnson
Methodological Issues in Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Malassezia pachydermatis
Journal of Fungi
Malassezia pachydermatis
susceptibility testing
broth microdilution
disk diffusion
minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)
title Methodological Issues in Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Malassezia pachydermatis
title_full Methodological Issues in Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Malassezia pachydermatis
title_fullStr Methodological Issues in Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Malassezia pachydermatis
title_full_unstemmed Methodological Issues in Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Malassezia pachydermatis
title_short Methodological Issues in Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Malassezia pachydermatis
title_sort methodological issues in antifungal susceptibility testing of malassezia pachydermatis
topic Malassezia pachydermatis
susceptibility testing
broth microdilution
disk diffusion
minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)
url https://www.mdpi.com/2309-608X/3/3/37
work_keys_str_mv AT andreapeano methodologicalissuesinantifungalsusceptibilitytestingofmalasseziapachydermatis
AT mariopasquetti methodologicalissuesinantifungalsusceptibilitytestingofmalasseziapachydermatis
AT paolotizzani methodologicalissuesinantifungalsusceptibilitytestingofmalasseziapachydermatis
AT elisachiavassa methodologicalissuesinantifungalsusceptibilitytestingofmalasseziapachydermatis
AT jacquesguillot methodologicalissuesinantifungalsusceptibilitytestingofmalasseziapachydermatis
AT elizabethjohnson methodologicalissuesinantifungalsusceptibilitytestingofmalasseziapachydermatis