Neuroimaging markers of clinical progression in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

Background: One of the main goals of novel, noninvasive imaging techniques like high-resolution nerve ultrasound (HRUS) and corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is the prediction of treatment response for patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). Methods: A total o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kalliopi Pitarokoili, Dietrich Sturm, Adnan Labedi, Tineke Greiner, Lynn Eitner, Nina Kumowski, Elena K. Enax-Krumova, Anna Lena Fisse, Christoph Maier, Ralf Gold, Martin Tegenthoff, Tobias Schmidt-Wilcke, Min-Suk Yoon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2019-06-01
Series:Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1756286419855485
_version_ 1818961466221395968
author Kalliopi Pitarokoili
Dietrich Sturm
Adnan Labedi
Tineke Greiner
Lynn Eitner
Nina Kumowski
Elena K. Enax-Krumova
Anna Lena Fisse
Christoph Maier
Ralf Gold
Martin Tegenthoff
Tobias Schmidt-Wilcke
Min-Suk Yoon
author_facet Kalliopi Pitarokoili
Dietrich Sturm
Adnan Labedi
Tineke Greiner
Lynn Eitner
Nina Kumowski
Elena K. Enax-Krumova
Anna Lena Fisse
Christoph Maier
Ralf Gold
Martin Tegenthoff
Tobias Schmidt-Wilcke
Min-Suk Yoon
author_sort Kalliopi Pitarokoili
collection DOAJ
description Background: One of the main goals of novel, noninvasive imaging techniques like high-resolution nerve ultrasound (HRUS) and corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is the prediction of treatment response for patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). Methods: A total of 17 patients with CIDP were examined prospectively at baseline and every 9 months over a period of 18 months using CCM to quantify corneal nerve degeneration markers and immune cell infiltration as well as HRUS to detect changes of the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the peripheral nerves. Additionally, skin biopsy of the distal and proximal leg as well as quantitative sensory testing were performed at the first follow-up visit. Results: A value of more than 30 total corneal cells/mm 2 in CCM at baseline identified patients with clinical progression with a sensitivity/specificity of 100% in our cohort. Corneal nerve fiber density and length remained low and stable over the study period and intra-epidermal fiber density was markedly reduced in the majority of the patients. Furthermore, an increase in Bochum ultrasound score (BUS), which summarizes the CSA of the ulnar nerve in Guyons’ canal, the ulnar nerve in the upper arm, the radial nerve in the spiral groove and the sural nerve between the gastrocnemius muscle, and a maximum BUS of 4 at study initiation identified patients with disease progression (sensitivity 80%, specificity 88%). Conclusions: BUS and corneal total cell infiltration seem to represent early markers for clinical progression in CIDP, thus having the potential to identify at-risk patients and impact treatment decisions.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T12:13:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-59a51140293e41e59dcf3b9bfa9c7f0a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1756-2864
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T12:13:52Z
publishDate 2019-06-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders
spelling doaj.art-59a51140293e41e59dcf3b9bfa9c7f0a2022-12-21T19:41:11ZengSAGE PublishingTherapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders1756-28642019-06-011210.1177/1756286419855485Neuroimaging markers of clinical progression in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathyKalliopi PitarokoiliDietrich SturmAdnan LabediTineke GreinerLynn EitnerNina KumowskiElena K. Enax-KrumovaAnna Lena FisseChristoph MaierRalf GoldMartin TegenthoffTobias Schmidt-WilckeMin-Suk YoonBackground: One of the main goals of novel, noninvasive imaging techniques like high-resolution nerve ultrasound (HRUS) and corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is the prediction of treatment response for patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). Methods: A total of 17 patients with CIDP were examined prospectively at baseline and every 9 months over a period of 18 months using CCM to quantify corneal nerve degeneration markers and immune cell infiltration as well as HRUS to detect changes of the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the peripheral nerves. Additionally, skin biopsy of the distal and proximal leg as well as quantitative sensory testing were performed at the first follow-up visit. Results: A value of more than 30 total corneal cells/mm 2 in CCM at baseline identified patients with clinical progression with a sensitivity/specificity of 100% in our cohort. Corneal nerve fiber density and length remained low and stable over the study period and intra-epidermal fiber density was markedly reduced in the majority of the patients. Furthermore, an increase in Bochum ultrasound score (BUS), which summarizes the CSA of the ulnar nerve in Guyons’ canal, the ulnar nerve in the upper arm, the radial nerve in the spiral groove and the sural nerve between the gastrocnemius muscle, and a maximum BUS of 4 at study initiation identified patients with disease progression (sensitivity 80%, specificity 88%). Conclusions: BUS and corneal total cell infiltration seem to represent early markers for clinical progression in CIDP, thus having the potential to identify at-risk patients and impact treatment decisions.https://doi.org/10.1177/1756286419855485
spellingShingle Kalliopi Pitarokoili
Dietrich Sturm
Adnan Labedi
Tineke Greiner
Lynn Eitner
Nina Kumowski
Elena K. Enax-Krumova
Anna Lena Fisse
Christoph Maier
Ralf Gold
Martin Tegenthoff
Tobias Schmidt-Wilcke
Min-Suk Yoon
Neuroimaging markers of clinical progression in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy
Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders
title Neuroimaging markers of clinical progression in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy
title_full Neuroimaging markers of clinical progression in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy
title_fullStr Neuroimaging markers of clinical progression in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy
title_full_unstemmed Neuroimaging markers of clinical progression in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy
title_short Neuroimaging markers of clinical progression in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy
title_sort neuroimaging markers of clinical progression in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1756286419855485
work_keys_str_mv AT kalliopipitarokoili neuroimagingmarkersofclinicalprogressioninchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyradiculoneuropathy
AT dietrichsturm neuroimagingmarkersofclinicalprogressioninchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyradiculoneuropathy
AT adnanlabedi neuroimagingmarkersofclinicalprogressioninchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyradiculoneuropathy
AT tinekegreiner neuroimagingmarkersofclinicalprogressioninchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyradiculoneuropathy
AT lynneitner neuroimagingmarkersofclinicalprogressioninchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyradiculoneuropathy
AT ninakumowski neuroimagingmarkersofclinicalprogressioninchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyradiculoneuropathy
AT elenakenaxkrumova neuroimagingmarkersofclinicalprogressioninchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyradiculoneuropathy
AT annalenafisse neuroimagingmarkersofclinicalprogressioninchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyradiculoneuropathy
AT christophmaier neuroimagingmarkersofclinicalprogressioninchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyradiculoneuropathy
AT ralfgold neuroimagingmarkersofclinicalprogressioninchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyradiculoneuropathy
AT martintegenthoff neuroimagingmarkersofclinicalprogressioninchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyradiculoneuropathy
AT tobiasschmidtwilcke neuroimagingmarkersofclinicalprogressioninchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyradiculoneuropathy
AT minsukyoon neuroimagingmarkersofclinicalprogressioninchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyradiculoneuropathy