Constitutional Implications of KPK Leadership Term Changes: Analysis of MK Decision No. 112/PUU-XX/2022 and Ruling Inconsistencies

Constitutional Court Decision No. 112/PUU-XX/2022, issued on May 25, 2023, underwent an amendment involving an analysis of Article 29 letter e and Article 34 in Law No. 19 of 2019 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission (UU KPK) in conjunction with Law No. 30 of 2002. This decision is deem...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Romi Galih Prabowo, Wahyu Donri Tinambunan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton 2023-12-01
Series:Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jurnal-umbuton.ac.id/index.php/Volkgeist/article/view/4652
_version_ 1797346358155280384
author Romi Galih Prabowo
Wahyu Donri Tinambunan
author_facet Romi Galih Prabowo
Wahyu Donri Tinambunan
author_sort Romi Galih Prabowo
collection DOAJ
description Constitutional Court Decision No. 112/PUU-XX/2022, issued on May 25, 2023, underwent an amendment involving an analysis of Article 29 letter e and Article 34 in Law No. 19 of 2019 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission (UU KPK) in conjunction with Law No. 30 of 2002. This decision is deemed inconsistent with constitutional principles and has the potential to impact anti-corruption efforts in Indonesia. The amendment provides a comprehensive analysis of the effects of the change in the term of office of the KPK leadership on the stability and performance of the institution, as well as its implications for anti-corruption efforts in Indonesia. The research methodology employed is normative juridical legal research with qualitative analysis of the Constitutional Court Decision and relevant legislation. This study aims to delve into the impact of the change in the term of office of the Chairman of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) through Constitutional Court Decision No. 112/PUU-XX/2022. The research findings indicate significant changes in Article 29 letter e and Article 34 of Law No. 19 of 2019 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). Inconsistencies are observed in the application of the open legal policy concept by the Constitutional Court, particularly regarding the assessment of numerical values in previous rulings. Additionally, the study highlights errors in applying the non-retroactive principle concerning the changes in the term of office for KPK leaders, leading to controversy over the retroactive aspect of legal amendments.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T11:31:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-59a72428588f4a3987dbe7e7e5b854cf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2528-360X
2621-6159
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T11:31:01Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton
record_format Article
series Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist
spelling doaj.art-59a72428588f4a3987dbe7e7e5b854cf2024-01-25T18:28:32ZengFakultas Hukum, Universitas Muhammadiyah ButonJurnal Hukum Volkgeist2528-360X2621-61592023-12-018110.35326/volkgeist.v8i1.4652Constitutional Implications of KPK Leadership Term Changes: Analysis of MK Decision No. 112/PUU-XX/2022 and Ruling InconsistenciesRomi Galih Prabowo0Wahyu Donri Tinambunan1Universitas Singaperbangsa KarawangUniversitas Singaperbangsa Karawang Constitutional Court Decision No. 112/PUU-XX/2022, issued on May 25, 2023, underwent an amendment involving an analysis of Article 29 letter e and Article 34 in Law No. 19 of 2019 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission (UU KPK) in conjunction with Law No. 30 of 2002. This decision is deemed inconsistent with constitutional principles and has the potential to impact anti-corruption efforts in Indonesia. The amendment provides a comprehensive analysis of the effects of the change in the term of office of the KPK leadership on the stability and performance of the institution, as well as its implications for anti-corruption efforts in Indonesia. The research methodology employed is normative juridical legal research with qualitative analysis of the Constitutional Court Decision and relevant legislation. This study aims to delve into the impact of the change in the term of office of the Chairman of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) through Constitutional Court Decision No. 112/PUU-XX/2022. The research findings indicate significant changes in Article 29 letter e and Article 34 of Law No. 19 of 2019 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). Inconsistencies are observed in the application of the open legal policy concept by the Constitutional Court, particularly regarding the assessment of numerical values in previous rulings. Additionally, the study highlights errors in applying the non-retroactive principle concerning the changes in the term of office for KPK leaders, leading to controversy over the retroactive aspect of legal amendments. http://www.jurnal-umbuton.ac.id/index.php/Volkgeist/article/view/4652Constitutional Court Decision,KPKTerm Extension
spellingShingle Romi Galih Prabowo
Wahyu Donri Tinambunan
Constitutional Implications of KPK Leadership Term Changes: Analysis of MK Decision No. 112/PUU-XX/2022 and Ruling Inconsistencies
Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist
Constitutional Court Decision,
KPK
Term Extension
title Constitutional Implications of KPK Leadership Term Changes: Analysis of MK Decision No. 112/PUU-XX/2022 and Ruling Inconsistencies
title_full Constitutional Implications of KPK Leadership Term Changes: Analysis of MK Decision No. 112/PUU-XX/2022 and Ruling Inconsistencies
title_fullStr Constitutional Implications of KPK Leadership Term Changes: Analysis of MK Decision No. 112/PUU-XX/2022 and Ruling Inconsistencies
title_full_unstemmed Constitutional Implications of KPK Leadership Term Changes: Analysis of MK Decision No. 112/PUU-XX/2022 and Ruling Inconsistencies
title_short Constitutional Implications of KPK Leadership Term Changes: Analysis of MK Decision No. 112/PUU-XX/2022 and Ruling Inconsistencies
title_sort constitutional implications of kpk leadership term changes analysis of mk decision no 112 puu xx 2022 and ruling inconsistencies
topic Constitutional Court Decision,
KPK
Term Extension
url http://www.jurnal-umbuton.ac.id/index.php/Volkgeist/article/view/4652
work_keys_str_mv AT romigalihprabowo constitutionalimplicationsofkpkleadershiptermchangesanalysisofmkdecisionno112puuxx2022andrulinginconsistencies
AT wahyudonritinambunan constitutionalimplicationsofkpkleadershiptermchangesanalysisofmkdecisionno112puuxx2022andrulinginconsistencies