Mutual Vulnerability? Asymmetric Relationships in Biblical Anthropology

The 2019 PBC document views relationships between parents and children, masters and servants, “shepherds” and “the flock,” civil authority and citizens as asymmetric. The structure of the document suggests that these relationship systems are based on shared human experience and a common theological...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Levente Balazs Martos
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin 2022-07-01
Series:The Biblical Annals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://czasopisma.kul.pl/index.php/ba/article/view/13534
_version_ 1827882992792502272
author Levente Balazs Martos
author_facet Levente Balazs Martos
author_sort Levente Balazs Martos
collection DOAJ
description The 2019 PBC document views relationships between parents and children, masters and servants, “shepherds” and “the flock,” civil authority and citizens as asymmetric. The structure of the document suggests that these relationship systems are based on shared human experience and a common theological foundation: they appear to repeat the pattern of the parent-child relationship and originate in the obligation to obey God. Using the document as a starting point, I would like to outline what the concept of asymmetric relationships can mean today. In search of common perspectives, I will compare New Testament texts with the interpretation of asymmetry in today’s social ethics discourse. The inequality and asymmetry of different persons and groups seem to be an undeniable fact, causing tension that can be resolved fruitfully by parties who take responsibility for each other in the presence of a “third.”
first_indexed 2024-03-12T19:05:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-59a9475fde4c4afc8e8a8f55cffa05cb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2083-2222
2451-2168
language deu
last_indexed 2024-03-12T19:05:13Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin
record_format Article
series The Biblical Annals
spelling doaj.art-59a9475fde4c4afc8e8a8f55cffa05cb2023-08-02T06:17:53ZdeuThe John Paul II Catholic University of LublinThe Biblical Annals2083-22222451-21682022-07-0112310.31743/biban.13534Mutual Vulnerability? Asymmetric Relationships in Biblical AnthropologyLevente Balazs Martos0Pázmány Péter Catholic University The 2019 PBC document views relationships between parents and children, masters and servants, “shepherds” and “the flock,” civil authority and citizens as asymmetric. The structure of the document suggests that these relationship systems are based on shared human experience and a common theological foundation: they appear to repeat the pattern of the parent-child relationship and originate in the obligation to obey God. Using the document as a starting point, I would like to outline what the concept of asymmetric relationships can mean today. In search of common perspectives, I will compare New Testament texts with the interpretation of asymmetry in today’s social ethics discourse. The inequality and asymmetry of different persons and groups seem to be an undeniable fact, causing tension that can be resolved fruitfully by parties who take responsibility for each other in the presence of a “third.” https://czasopisma.kul.pl/index.php/ba/article/view/13534vulnerabilityasymmetric relationshipsreciprocityobedience
spellingShingle Levente Balazs Martos
Mutual Vulnerability? Asymmetric Relationships in Biblical Anthropology
The Biblical Annals
vulnerability
asymmetric relationships
reciprocity
obedience
title Mutual Vulnerability? Asymmetric Relationships in Biblical Anthropology
title_full Mutual Vulnerability? Asymmetric Relationships in Biblical Anthropology
title_fullStr Mutual Vulnerability? Asymmetric Relationships in Biblical Anthropology
title_full_unstemmed Mutual Vulnerability? Asymmetric Relationships in Biblical Anthropology
title_short Mutual Vulnerability? Asymmetric Relationships in Biblical Anthropology
title_sort mutual vulnerability asymmetric relationships in biblical anthropology
topic vulnerability
asymmetric relationships
reciprocity
obedience
url https://czasopisma.kul.pl/index.php/ba/article/view/13534
work_keys_str_mv AT leventebalazsmartos mutualvulnerabilityasymmetricrelationshipsinbiblicalanthropology