Comparison of clinical validation of acceleromyography and electromyography in children who were administered rocuronium during general anesthesia: a prospective double-blinded randomized study

BackgroundElectromyography and acceleromyography are common neuromuscular monitoring devices. However, questions still remain regarding the use of acceleromyography in children. This study compared the calibration success rates and intubation conditions in children after obtaining the maximal blocka...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Woojun Jung, Minho Hwang, Young Ju Won, Byung Gun Lim, Myoung-Hoon Kong, Il-Ok Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2016-02-01
Series:Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ekja.org/upload/pdf/kjae-69-21.pdf
_version_ 1818324916123992064
author Woojun Jung
Minho Hwang
Young Ju Won
Byung Gun Lim
Myoung-Hoon Kong
Il-Ok Lee
author_facet Woojun Jung
Minho Hwang
Young Ju Won
Byung Gun Lim
Myoung-Hoon Kong
Il-Ok Lee
author_sort Woojun Jung
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundElectromyography and acceleromyography are common neuromuscular monitoring devices. However, questions still remain regarding the use of acceleromyography in children. This study compared the calibration success rates and intubation conditions in children after obtaining the maximal blockade depending on each of the devicesMethodsChildren, 3 to 6 years old, were randomly allocated to the TOF-Watch SX acceleromyography group or the NMT electromyography group. The induction was performed with propofol, fentanyl, and rocuronium. The bispectral index and 1 Hz single twitch were monitored during observation. The calibration of the each device was begun when the BIS dropped to 60. After successful calibration, rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg was injected. A tracheal intubation was performed when the twitch height suppressed to 0. The rocuronium onset time (time from administration to the maximal depression of twitch height) and intubating conditions were rated in a blinded manner.ResultsThere was no difference in the calibration success rates between the two groups; and the calibration time in the electromyography group (16.7 ± 11.0 seconds) was shorter than the acceleromyography group (28.1 ± 13.4 seconds, P = 0.012). The rocuronium onset time of the electromyography group (73.6 ± 18.9 seconds) was longer than the acceleromyography group (63.9 ± 18.8 seconds, P = 0.042) and the intubation condition of the electromyography group (2.27 ± 0.65) was better than the acceleromyography group (1.86 ± 0.50, P = 0.007).ConclusionsElectromyography offers a better compromise than acceleromyography with respect to the duration of calibration process and surrogate for the optimal time of tracheal intubation in children.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T11:36:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-59b960b1cf444bf9928655346ca8776d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2005-6419
2005-7563
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T11:36:11Z
publishDate 2016-02-01
publisher Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
record_format Article
series Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
spelling doaj.art-59b960b1cf444bf9928655346ca8776d2022-12-21T23:47:47ZengKorean Society of AnesthesiologistsKorean Journal of Anesthesiology2005-64192005-75632016-02-01691212610.4097/kjae.2016.69.1.218169Comparison of clinical validation of acceleromyography and electromyography in children who were administered rocuronium during general anesthesia: a prospective double-blinded randomized studyWoojun Jung0Minho Hwang1Young Ju Won2Byung Gun Lim3Myoung-Hoon Kong4Il-Ok Lee5Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.BackgroundElectromyography and acceleromyography are common neuromuscular monitoring devices. However, questions still remain regarding the use of acceleromyography in children. This study compared the calibration success rates and intubation conditions in children after obtaining the maximal blockade depending on each of the devicesMethodsChildren, 3 to 6 years old, were randomly allocated to the TOF-Watch SX acceleromyography group or the NMT electromyography group. The induction was performed with propofol, fentanyl, and rocuronium. The bispectral index and 1 Hz single twitch were monitored during observation. The calibration of the each device was begun when the BIS dropped to 60. After successful calibration, rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg was injected. A tracheal intubation was performed when the twitch height suppressed to 0. The rocuronium onset time (time from administration to the maximal depression of twitch height) and intubating conditions were rated in a blinded manner.ResultsThere was no difference in the calibration success rates between the two groups; and the calibration time in the electromyography group (16.7 ± 11.0 seconds) was shorter than the acceleromyography group (28.1 ± 13.4 seconds, P = 0.012). The rocuronium onset time of the electromyography group (73.6 ± 18.9 seconds) was longer than the acceleromyography group (63.9 ± 18.8 seconds, P = 0.042) and the intubation condition of the electromyography group (2.27 ± 0.65) was better than the acceleromyography group (1.86 ± 0.50, P = 0.007).ConclusionsElectromyography offers a better compromise than acceleromyography with respect to the duration of calibration process and surrogate for the optimal time of tracheal intubation in children.http://ekja.org/upload/pdf/kjae-69-21.pdfacceleromyographyelectromyographyneuromuscular monitoringpreschool childrocuronium
spellingShingle Woojun Jung
Minho Hwang
Young Ju Won
Byung Gun Lim
Myoung-Hoon Kong
Il-Ok Lee
Comparison of clinical validation of acceleromyography and electromyography in children who were administered rocuronium during general anesthesia: a prospective double-blinded randomized study
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
acceleromyography
electromyography
neuromuscular monitoring
preschool child
rocuronium
title Comparison of clinical validation of acceleromyography and electromyography in children who were administered rocuronium during general anesthesia: a prospective double-blinded randomized study
title_full Comparison of clinical validation of acceleromyography and electromyography in children who were administered rocuronium during general anesthesia: a prospective double-blinded randomized study
title_fullStr Comparison of clinical validation of acceleromyography and electromyography in children who were administered rocuronium during general anesthesia: a prospective double-blinded randomized study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of clinical validation of acceleromyography and electromyography in children who were administered rocuronium during general anesthesia: a prospective double-blinded randomized study
title_short Comparison of clinical validation of acceleromyography and electromyography in children who were administered rocuronium during general anesthesia: a prospective double-blinded randomized study
title_sort comparison of clinical validation of acceleromyography and electromyography in children who were administered rocuronium during general anesthesia a prospective double blinded randomized study
topic acceleromyography
electromyography
neuromuscular monitoring
preschool child
rocuronium
url http://ekja.org/upload/pdf/kjae-69-21.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT woojunjung comparisonofclinicalvalidationofacceleromyographyandelectromyographyinchildrenwhowereadministeredrocuroniumduringgeneralanesthesiaaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedstudy
AT minhohwang comparisonofclinicalvalidationofacceleromyographyandelectromyographyinchildrenwhowereadministeredrocuroniumduringgeneralanesthesiaaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedstudy
AT youngjuwon comparisonofclinicalvalidationofacceleromyographyandelectromyographyinchildrenwhowereadministeredrocuroniumduringgeneralanesthesiaaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedstudy
AT byunggunlim comparisonofclinicalvalidationofacceleromyographyandelectromyographyinchildrenwhowereadministeredrocuroniumduringgeneralanesthesiaaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedstudy
AT myounghoonkong comparisonofclinicalvalidationofacceleromyographyandelectromyographyinchildrenwhowereadministeredrocuroniumduringgeneralanesthesiaaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedstudy
AT iloklee comparisonofclinicalvalidationofacceleromyographyandelectromyographyinchildrenwhowereadministeredrocuroniumduringgeneralanesthesiaaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedstudy