A systematic comparison of eight new plastome sequences from Ipomoea L

Background Ipomoea is the largest genus in the family Convolvulaceae. The species in this genus have been widely used in many fields, such as agriculture, nutrition, and medicine. With the development of next-generation sequencing, more than 50 chloroplast genomes of Ipomoea species have been sequen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jianying Sun, Xiaofeng Dong, Qinghe Cao, Tao Xu, Mingku Zhu, Jian Sun, Tingting Dong, Daifu Ma, Yonghua Han, Zongyun Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2019-03-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/6563.pdf
_version_ 1797418381071089664
author Jianying Sun
Xiaofeng Dong
Qinghe Cao
Tao Xu
Mingku Zhu
Jian Sun
Tingting Dong
Daifu Ma
Yonghua Han
Zongyun Li
author_facet Jianying Sun
Xiaofeng Dong
Qinghe Cao
Tao Xu
Mingku Zhu
Jian Sun
Tingting Dong
Daifu Ma
Yonghua Han
Zongyun Li
author_sort Jianying Sun
collection DOAJ
description Background Ipomoea is the largest genus in the family Convolvulaceae. The species in this genus have been widely used in many fields, such as agriculture, nutrition, and medicine. With the development of next-generation sequencing, more than 50 chloroplast genomes of Ipomoea species have been sequenced. However, the repeats and divergence regions in Ipomoea have not been well investigated. In the present study, we sequenced and assembled eight chloroplast genomes from sweet potato’s close wild relatives. By combining these with 32 published chloroplast genomes, we conducted a detailed comparative analysis of a broad range of Ipomoea species. Methods Eight chloroplast genomes were assembled using short DNA sequences generated by next-generation sequencing technology. By combining these chloroplast genomes with 32 other published Ipomoea chloroplast genomes downloaded from GenBank and the Oxford Research Archive, we conducted a comparative analysis of the repeat sequences and divergence regions across the Ipomoea genus. In addition, separate analyses of the Batatas group and Quamoclit group were also performed. Results The eight newly sequenced chloroplast genomes ranged from 161,225 to 161,721 bp in length and displayed the typical circular quadripartite structure, consisting of a pair of inverted repeat (IR) regions (30,798–30,910 bp each) separated by a large single copy (LSC) region (87,575–88,004 bp) and a small single copy (SSC) region (12,018–12,051 bp). The average guanine-cytosine (GC) content was approximately 40.5% in the IR region, 36.1% in the LSC region, 32.2% in the SSC regions, and 37.5% in complete sequence for all the generated plastomes. The eight chloroplast genome sequences from this study included 80 protein-coding genes, four rRNAs (rrn23, rrn16, rrn5, and rrn4.5), and 37 tRNAs. The boundaries of single copy regions and IR regions were highly conserved in the eight chloroplast genomes. In Ipomoea, 57–89 pairs of repetitive sequences and 39–64 simple sequence repeats were found. By conducting a sliding window analysis, we found six relatively high variable regions (ndhA intron, ndhH-ndhF, ndhF-rpl32, rpl32-trnL, rps16-trnQ, and ndhF) in the Ipomoea genus, eight (trnG, rpl32-trnL, ndhA intron, ndhF-rpl32, ndhH-ndhF, ccsA-ndhD, trnG-trnR, and pasA-ycf3) in the Batatas group, and eight (ndhA intron, petN-psbM, rpl32-trnL, trnG-trnR, trnK-rps16, ndhC-trnV, rps16-trnQ, and trnG) in the Quamoclit group. Our maximum-likelihood tree based on whole chloroplast genomes confirmed the phylogenetic topology reported in previous studies. Conclusions The chloroplast genome sequence and structure were highly conserved in the eight newly-sequenced Ipomoea species. Our comparative analysis included a broad range of Ipomoea chloroplast genomes, providing valuable information for Ipomoea species identification and enhancing the understanding of Ipomoea genetic resources.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T06:31:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-59bf8638cee743fa9527cd86abc8a5f8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2167-8359
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T06:31:56Z
publishDate 2019-03-01
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format Article
series PeerJ
spelling doaj.art-59bf8638cee743fa9527cd86abc8a5f82023-12-03T11:04:00ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592019-03-017e656310.7717/peerj.6563A systematic comparison of eight new plastome sequences from Ipomoea LJianying Sun0Xiaofeng Dong1Qinghe Cao2Tao Xu3Mingku Zhu4Jian Sun5Tingting Dong6Daifu Ma7Yonghua Han8Zongyun Li9Institute of Integrative Plant Biology, School of Life Sciences, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, ChinaInstitute of Integrative Plant Biology, School of Life Sciences, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, ChinaJiangsu Xuhuai Regional Xuzhou Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xuzhou, ChinaInstitute of Integrative Plant Biology, School of Life Sciences, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, ChinaInstitute of Integrative Plant Biology, School of Life Sciences, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, ChinaInstitute of Integrative Plant Biology, School of Life Sciences, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, ChinaInstitute of Integrative Plant Biology, School of Life Sciences, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, ChinaJiangsu Xuhuai Regional Xuzhou Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xuzhou, ChinaInstitute of Integrative Plant Biology, School of Life Sciences, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, ChinaInstitute of Integrative Plant Biology, School of Life Sciences, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, ChinaBackground Ipomoea is the largest genus in the family Convolvulaceae. The species in this genus have been widely used in many fields, such as agriculture, nutrition, and medicine. With the development of next-generation sequencing, more than 50 chloroplast genomes of Ipomoea species have been sequenced. However, the repeats and divergence regions in Ipomoea have not been well investigated. In the present study, we sequenced and assembled eight chloroplast genomes from sweet potato’s close wild relatives. By combining these with 32 published chloroplast genomes, we conducted a detailed comparative analysis of a broad range of Ipomoea species. Methods Eight chloroplast genomes were assembled using short DNA sequences generated by next-generation sequencing technology. By combining these chloroplast genomes with 32 other published Ipomoea chloroplast genomes downloaded from GenBank and the Oxford Research Archive, we conducted a comparative analysis of the repeat sequences and divergence regions across the Ipomoea genus. In addition, separate analyses of the Batatas group and Quamoclit group were also performed. Results The eight newly sequenced chloroplast genomes ranged from 161,225 to 161,721 bp in length and displayed the typical circular quadripartite structure, consisting of a pair of inverted repeat (IR) regions (30,798–30,910 bp each) separated by a large single copy (LSC) region (87,575–88,004 bp) and a small single copy (SSC) region (12,018–12,051 bp). The average guanine-cytosine (GC) content was approximately 40.5% in the IR region, 36.1% in the LSC region, 32.2% in the SSC regions, and 37.5% in complete sequence for all the generated plastomes. The eight chloroplast genome sequences from this study included 80 protein-coding genes, four rRNAs (rrn23, rrn16, rrn5, and rrn4.5), and 37 tRNAs. The boundaries of single copy regions and IR regions were highly conserved in the eight chloroplast genomes. In Ipomoea, 57–89 pairs of repetitive sequences and 39–64 simple sequence repeats were found. By conducting a sliding window analysis, we found six relatively high variable regions (ndhA intron, ndhH-ndhF, ndhF-rpl32, rpl32-trnL, rps16-trnQ, and ndhF) in the Ipomoea genus, eight (trnG, rpl32-trnL, ndhA intron, ndhF-rpl32, ndhH-ndhF, ccsA-ndhD, trnG-trnR, and pasA-ycf3) in the Batatas group, and eight (ndhA intron, petN-psbM, rpl32-trnL, trnG-trnR, trnK-rps16, ndhC-trnV, rps16-trnQ, and trnG) in the Quamoclit group. Our maximum-likelihood tree based on whole chloroplast genomes confirmed the phylogenetic topology reported in previous studies. Conclusions The chloroplast genome sequence and structure were highly conserved in the eight newly-sequenced Ipomoea species. Our comparative analysis included a broad range of Ipomoea chloroplast genomes, providing valuable information for Ipomoea species identification and enhancing the understanding of Ipomoea genetic resources.https://peerj.com/articles/6563.pdfIpomoeaChloroplast genomeDivergence hotspotRepeatsGenome structure
spellingShingle Jianying Sun
Xiaofeng Dong
Qinghe Cao
Tao Xu
Mingku Zhu
Jian Sun
Tingting Dong
Daifu Ma
Yonghua Han
Zongyun Li
A systematic comparison of eight new plastome sequences from Ipomoea L
PeerJ
Ipomoea
Chloroplast genome
Divergence hotspot
Repeats
Genome structure
title A systematic comparison of eight new plastome sequences from Ipomoea L
title_full A systematic comparison of eight new plastome sequences from Ipomoea L
title_fullStr A systematic comparison of eight new plastome sequences from Ipomoea L
title_full_unstemmed A systematic comparison of eight new plastome sequences from Ipomoea L
title_short A systematic comparison of eight new plastome sequences from Ipomoea L
title_sort systematic comparison of eight new plastome sequences from ipomoea l
topic Ipomoea
Chloroplast genome
Divergence hotspot
Repeats
Genome structure
url https://peerj.com/articles/6563.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jianyingsun asystematiccomparisonofeightnewplastomesequencesfromipomoeal
AT xiaofengdong asystematiccomparisonofeightnewplastomesequencesfromipomoeal
AT qinghecao asystematiccomparisonofeightnewplastomesequencesfromipomoeal
AT taoxu asystematiccomparisonofeightnewplastomesequencesfromipomoeal
AT mingkuzhu asystematiccomparisonofeightnewplastomesequencesfromipomoeal
AT jiansun asystematiccomparisonofeightnewplastomesequencesfromipomoeal
AT tingtingdong asystematiccomparisonofeightnewplastomesequencesfromipomoeal
AT daifuma asystematiccomparisonofeightnewplastomesequencesfromipomoeal
AT yonghuahan asystematiccomparisonofeightnewplastomesequencesfromipomoeal
AT zongyunli asystematiccomparisonofeightnewplastomesequencesfromipomoeal
AT jianyingsun systematiccomparisonofeightnewplastomesequencesfromipomoeal
AT xiaofengdong systematiccomparisonofeightnewplastomesequencesfromipomoeal
AT qinghecao systematiccomparisonofeightnewplastomesequencesfromipomoeal
AT taoxu systematiccomparisonofeightnewplastomesequencesfromipomoeal
AT mingkuzhu systematiccomparisonofeightnewplastomesequencesfromipomoeal
AT jiansun systematiccomparisonofeightnewplastomesequencesfromipomoeal
AT tingtingdong systematiccomparisonofeightnewplastomesequencesfromipomoeal
AT daifuma systematiccomparisonofeightnewplastomesequencesfromipomoeal
AT yonghuahan systematiccomparisonofeightnewplastomesequencesfromipomoeal
AT zongyunli systematiccomparisonofeightnewplastomesequencesfromipomoeal