Treatment and Implications of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Inhibitor‐Induced Blood Pressure Rise: A Clinical Cohort Study

Background Anti‐cancer vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (VEGFI) frequently induce a rise in blood pressure (BP). The most effective treatment of this BP rise is currently unknown, and risk factors and its association with survival remain inconclusive. Methods and Results Baseline charac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daan C. H. van Dorst, Sumeyye Kabadayi, Esther Oomen‐de Hoop, A.H. Jan Danser, Ron H. J. Mathijssen, Jorie Versmissen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-01-01
Series:Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.122.028050
_version_ 1797905044018823168
author Daan C. H. van Dorst
Sumeyye Kabadayi
Esther Oomen‐de Hoop
A.H. Jan Danser
Ron H. J. Mathijssen
Jorie Versmissen
author_facet Daan C. H. van Dorst
Sumeyye Kabadayi
Esther Oomen‐de Hoop
A.H. Jan Danser
Ron H. J. Mathijssen
Jorie Versmissen
author_sort Daan C. H. van Dorst
collection DOAJ
description Background Anti‐cancer vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (VEGFI) frequently induce a rise in blood pressure (BP). The most effective treatment of this BP rise is currently unknown, and risk factors and its association with survival remain inconclusive. Methods and Results Baseline characteristics and BP readings were retrospectively collected from oncology patients who received oral VEGFI treatment (sorafenib, sunitinib, pazopanib, regorafenib, lenvatinib, or cabozantinib). Risk factors for a clinically relevant BP rise (increase of ≥20 mm Hg in systolic BP or ≥10 mm Hg in diastolic BP) were investigated via logistic regression (relative), efficacy of antihypertensives via unpaired t‐tests, and association of BP rise with survival via Cox regression analysis. In total, 162 (47%) of 343 included patients developed a clinically relevant BP rise ≥7 days after VEGFI treatment initiation. Both calcium channel blockers and renin‐angiotensin system inhibitors effectively reduced systolic BP (−24.1 and −18.2 mm Hg, respectively) and diastolic BP (−12.0 and −11.0 mm Hg, respectively). Pazopanib therapy (odds ratio, 2.71 [95% CI, 1.35–5.42; P=0.005], compared with sorafenib) and estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 (OR, 1.75 [95% CI, 0.99–3.18, P=0.054]) were risk factors for a BP rise, whereas a baseline BP ≥140/90 mm Hg associated with a lower risk (OR, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.25–0.62, P<0.001]). Only for renal cell carcinoma, BP rise was associated with a substantially improved median overall survival compared with no BP rise: 45.4 versus 20.3 months, respectively, P=0.003. Conclusions The type of VEGFI, baseline BP, and baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate determine the VEGFI‐induced BP rise. Both calcium channel blockers and renin‐angiotensin system inhibitors are effective antihypertensive treatments. Particularly in patients with renal cell carcinoma, a BP rise is associated with improved overall survival.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T09:58:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-59d3fa5ccc3d4b688b07134a4440606a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2047-9980
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T09:58:48Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
spelling doaj.art-59d3fa5ccc3d4b688b07134a4440606a2023-02-16T10:55:33ZengWileyJournal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease2047-99802023-01-0112110.1161/JAHA.122.028050Treatment and Implications of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Inhibitor‐Induced Blood Pressure Rise: A Clinical Cohort StudyDaan C. H. van Dorst0Sumeyye Kabadayi1Esther Oomen‐de Hoop2A.H. Jan Danser3Ron H. J. Mathijssen4Jorie Versmissen5Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam The NetherlandsDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam The NetherlandsDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam The NetherlandsDivision of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Department of Internal Medicine Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam The NetherlandsDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam The NetherlandsDivision of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Department of Internal Medicine Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam The NetherlandsBackground Anti‐cancer vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (VEGFI) frequently induce a rise in blood pressure (BP). The most effective treatment of this BP rise is currently unknown, and risk factors and its association with survival remain inconclusive. Methods and Results Baseline characteristics and BP readings were retrospectively collected from oncology patients who received oral VEGFI treatment (sorafenib, sunitinib, pazopanib, regorafenib, lenvatinib, or cabozantinib). Risk factors for a clinically relevant BP rise (increase of ≥20 mm Hg in systolic BP or ≥10 mm Hg in diastolic BP) were investigated via logistic regression (relative), efficacy of antihypertensives via unpaired t‐tests, and association of BP rise with survival via Cox regression analysis. In total, 162 (47%) of 343 included patients developed a clinically relevant BP rise ≥7 days after VEGFI treatment initiation. Both calcium channel blockers and renin‐angiotensin system inhibitors effectively reduced systolic BP (−24.1 and −18.2 mm Hg, respectively) and diastolic BP (−12.0 and −11.0 mm Hg, respectively). Pazopanib therapy (odds ratio, 2.71 [95% CI, 1.35–5.42; P=0.005], compared with sorafenib) and estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 (OR, 1.75 [95% CI, 0.99–3.18, P=0.054]) were risk factors for a BP rise, whereas a baseline BP ≥140/90 mm Hg associated with a lower risk (OR, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.25–0.62, P<0.001]). Only for renal cell carcinoma, BP rise was associated with a substantially improved median overall survival compared with no BP rise: 45.4 versus 20.3 months, respectively, P=0.003. Conclusions The type of VEGFI, baseline BP, and baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate determine the VEGFI‐induced BP rise. Both calcium channel blockers and renin‐angiotensin system inhibitors are effective antihypertensive treatments. Particularly in patients with renal cell carcinoma, a BP rise is associated with improved overall survival.https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.122.028050antihypertensive agentscardio‐oncologyhypertensionsurvivalvascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor
spellingShingle Daan C. H. van Dorst
Sumeyye Kabadayi
Esther Oomen‐de Hoop
A.H. Jan Danser
Ron H. J. Mathijssen
Jorie Versmissen
Treatment and Implications of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Inhibitor‐Induced Blood Pressure Rise: A Clinical Cohort Study
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
antihypertensive agents
cardio‐oncology
hypertension
survival
vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor
title Treatment and Implications of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Inhibitor‐Induced Blood Pressure Rise: A Clinical Cohort Study
title_full Treatment and Implications of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Inhibitor‐Induced Blood Pressure Rise: A Clinical Cohort Study
title_fullStr Treatment and Implications of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Inhibitor‐Induced Blood Pressure Rise: A Clinical Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Treatment and Implications of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Inhibitor‐Induced Blood Pressure Rise: A Clinical Cohort Study
title_short Treatment and Implications of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Inhibitor‐Induced Blood Pressure Rise: A Clinical Cohort Study
title_sort treatment and implications of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor induced blood pressure rise a clinical cohort study
topic antihypertensive agents
cardio‐oncology
hypertension
survival
vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor
url https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.122.028050
work_keys_str_mv AT daanchvandorst treatmentandimplicationsofvascularendothelialgrowthfactorinhibitorinducedbloodpressureriseaclinicalcohortstudy
AT sumeyyekabadayi treatmentandimplicationsofvascularendothelialgrowthfactorinhibitorinducedbloodpressureriseaclinicalcohortstudy
AT estheroomendehoop treatmentandimplicationsofvascularendothelialgrowthfactorinhibitorinducedbloodpressureriseaclinicalcohortstudy
AT ahjandanser treatmentandimplicationsofvascularendothelialgrowthfactorinhibitorinducedbloodpressureriseaclinicalcohortstudy
AT ronhjmathijssen treatmentandimplicationsofvascularendothelialgrowthfactorinhibitorinducedbloodpressureriseaclinicalcohortstudy
AT jorieversmissen treatmentandimplicationsofvascularendothelialgrowthfactorinhibitorinducedbloodpressureriseaclinicalcohortstudy