Effect of fluoroscopy frame rate on radiation exposure and in-hospital outcomes in cardiovascular implantable electronic device implantation procedures

Objective: To assess the radiation exposure in cardiovascular implantable electronic device(CIED) implantation procedures, the effect of fluoroscopy frame rate on various radiation exposure indices, and in-hospital outcomes. Methods: Data of CIED implantation procedures from September 2015 to Decemb...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Muzaffar Ali, Bharatraj Banavalikar, Khalil Kanjwal, Milan Kumar Ghadei, Anju Kottayan, Deepak Padmanabhan, Jayaprakash Shenthar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-12-01
Series:Radiation Medicine and Protection
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666555721000587
_version_ 1827850965661777920
author Muzaffar Ali
Bharatraj Banavalikar
Khalil Kanjwal
Milan Kumar Ghadei
Anju Kottayan
Deepak Padmanabhan
Jayaprakash Shenthar
author_facet Muzaffar Ali
Bharatraj Banavalikar
Khalil Kanjwal
Milan Kumar Ghadei
Anju Kottayan
Deepak Padmanabhan
Jayaprakash Shenthar
author_sort Muzaffar Ali
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To assess the radiation exposure in cardiovascular implantable electronic device(CIED) implantation procedures, the effect of fluoroscopy frame rate on various radiation exposure indices, and in-hospital outcomes. Methods: Data of CIED implantation procedures from September 2015 to December 2019 of all the CIED implantation procedures performed at our institute were retrospectively analyzed. The procedural data were divided into two groups: a) pre-group: procedures that were performed under fluoroscopy frame rate of 7.5 frames per second(fps); b) post-group: procedures that were performed under fluoroscopy frame rate of 3.75 fps. We compared procedure time, fluoroscopy time, Kerma air product, effective dose, and in-hospital outcomes between the two groups. Results: A total of 2,225 procedures were included in the analysis with mean age of (62 ​± ​15) years. The procedures consisted of the implantation of single-chamber (n ​= ​1,436), double chamber (n ​= ​656), and biventricular devices (n ​= ​133). Procedure time and radiation indices showed a significant reduction over the study period (P ​< ​0.001). Reduction in the fluoroscopy frame rate was associated with a significant reduction in radiation exposure indices(P ​< ​0.001). In-hospital outcomes did not differ between the two groups. Conclusions: Reduction in the fluoroscopy frame rate from 7.5 to 3.75 fps significantly decreased the radiation exposure in CIED implantation procedures. A framerate lower than 3.75 fps should be the default setting during such procedures.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T10:25:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-59d5a9cfd66f4acea347a6df0b0eae9c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-5557
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T10:25:34Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Radiation Medicine and Protection
spelling doaj.art-59d5a9cfd66f4acea347a6df0b0eae9c2023-09-02T09:44:10ZengElsevierRadiation Medicine and Protection2666-55572021-12-0124176180Effect of fluoroscopy frame rate on radiation exposure and in-hospital outcomes in cardiovascular implantable electronic device implantation proceduresMuzaffar Ali0Bharatraj Banavalikar1Khalil Kanjwal2Milan Kumar Ghadei3Anju Kottayan4Deepak Padmanabhan5Jayaprakash Shenthar6Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research, Bangalore, India; Department of Cardiology, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Kashmir, India; Corresponding author. Department of Cardiology, SKIMS, Srinagar, Kashmir, India.Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research, Bangalore, IndiaDepartment of Cardiology, Division of Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology, McLaren Greater Lansing Hospital, Michigan, USADepartment of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research, Bangalore, IndiaDepartment of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research, Bangalore, IndiaDepartment of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research, Bangalore, IndiaDepartment of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research, Bangalore, IndiaObjective: To assess the radiation exposure in cardiovascular implantable electronic device(CIED) implantation procedures, the effect of fluoroscopy frame rate on various radiation exposure indices, and in-hospital outcomes. Methods: Data of CIED implantation procedures from September 2015 to December 2019 of all the CIED implantation procedures performed at our institute were retrospectively analyzed. The procedural data were divided into two groups: a) pre-group: procedures that were performed under fluoroscopy frame rate of 7.5 frames per second(fps); b) post-group: procedures that were performed under fluoroscopy frame rate of 3.75 fps. We compared procedure time, fluoroscopy time, Kerma air product, effective dose, and in-hospital outcomes between the two groups. Results: A total of 2,225 procedures were included in the analysis with mean age of (62 ​± ​15) years. The procedures consisted of the implantation of single-chamber (n ​= ​1,436), double chamber (n ​= ​656), and biventricular devices (n ​= ​133). Procedure time and radiation indices showed a significant reduction over the study period (P ​< ​0.001). Reduction in the fluoroscopy frame rate was associated with a significant reduction in radiation exposure indices(P ​< ​0.001). In-hospital outcomes did not differ between the two groups. Conclusions: Reduction in the fluoroscopy frame rate from 7.5 to 3.75 fps significantly decreased the radiation exposure in CIED implantation procedures. A framerate lower than 3.75 fps should be the default setting during such procedures.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666555721000587Cardiovascular implantable electronic devicesEffective doseFluoroscopy timeKerma air productPacemakersRadiation exposure
spellingShingle Muzaffar Ali
Bharatraj Banavalikar
Khalil Kanjwal
Milan Kumar Ghadei
Anju Kottayan
Deepak Padmanabhan
Jayaprakash Shenthar
Effect of fluoroscopy frame rate on radiation exposure and in-hospital outcomes in cardiovascular implantable electronic device implantation procedures
Radiation Medicine and Protection
Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices
Effective dose
Fluoroscopy time
Kerma air product
Pacemakers
Radiation exposure
title Effect of fluoroscopy frame rate on radiation exposure and in-hospital outcomes in cardiovascular implantable electronic device implantation procedures
title_full Effect of fluoroscopy frame rate on radiation exposure and in-hospital outcomes in cardiovascular implantable electronic device implantation procedures
title_fullStr Effect of fluoroscopy frame rate on radiation exposure and in-hospital outcomes in cardiovascular implantable electronic device implantation procedures
title_full_unstemmed Effect of fluoroscopy frame rate on radiation exposure and in-hospital outcomes in cardiovascular implantable electronic device implantation procedures
title_short Effect of fluoroscopy frame rate on radiation exposure and in-hospital outcomes in cardiovascular implantable electronic device implantation procedures
title_sort effect of fluoroscopy frame rate on radiation exposure and in hospital outcomes in cardiovascular implantable electronic device implantation procedures
topic Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices
Effective dose
Fluoroscopy time
Kerma air product
Pacemakers
Radiation exposure
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666555721000587
work_keys_str_mv AT muzaffarali effectoffluoroscopyframerateonradiationexposureandinhospitaloutcomesincardiovascularimplantableelectronicdeviceimplantationprocedures
AT bharatrajbanavalikar effectoffluoroscopyframerateonradiationexposureandinhospitaloutcomesincardiovascularimplantableelectronicdeviceimplantationprocedures
AT khalilkanjwal effectoffluoroscopyframerateonradiationexposureandinhospitaloutcomesincardiovascularimplantableelectronicdeviceimplantationprocedures
AT milankumarghadei effectoffluoroscopyframerateonradiationexposureandinhospitaloutcomesincardiovascularimplantableelectronicdeviceimplantationprocedures
AT anjukottayan effectoffluoroscopyframerateonradiationexposureandinhospitaloutcomesincardiovascularimplantableelectronicdeviceimplantationprocedures
AT deepakpadmanabhan effectoffluoroscopyframerateonradiationexposureandinhospitaloutcomesincardiovascularimplantableelectronicdeviceimplantationprocedures
AT jayaprakashshenthar effectoffluoroscopyframerateonradiationexposureandinhospitaloutcomesincardiovascularimplantableelectronicdeviceimplantationprocedures