Local perceptions of forest, conservation and logging in Papua New Guinea

The future of Papua New Guinea's (PNG) extensive forests is of some concern. Local communities may readily sell logging rights to timber companies to fund elusive ‘development’. Alternatively, they may hold the key to forest conservation. It may be possible, if landowners have some notion of ma...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Paul Sillitoe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Laboratoire Éco-anthropologie et Ethnobiologie 2014-12-01
Series:Revue d'ethnoécologie
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/ethnoecologie/1905
_version_ 1818343386706345984
author Paul Sillitoe
author_facet Paul Sillitoe
author_sort Paul Sillitoe
collection DOAJ
description The future of Papua New Guinea's (PNG) extensive forests is of some concern. Local communities may readily sell logging rights to timber companies to fund elusive ‘development’. Alternatively, they may hold the key to forest conservation. It may be possible, if landowners have some notion of managing forest resources, to build on these practices. But according to some commentators they traditionally lack a conservation ethic. In order to advise on forest policy, it is necessary to try and gauge the practices, attitudes and ideas of local people. This accords with current participatory development approaches to consult ‘grassroots’ opinion, as in indigenous knowledge (IK) research, which aims to facilitate interventions by promoting partnership and an awareness of local perspectives. It is indisputable that local people will be well qualified to define problems, and will be ‘experts’ on their forests. The difficulties encountered in formulating generalisations applicable on a large scale present a barrier to IK informing policy, as in the management of logging and promotion of forest conservation. The short-termism of development, politically driven for immediate returns, presents further problems. We need to evolve methods and formulate principles that will allow some reliable local inputs into policy debates. One way to assess local knowledge and aspirations quickly on a nation-wide level is to use surveys. This paper will discuss a rural community survey conducted in PNG to ascertain peoples’ attitudes to forestry, logging and conservation, and inform policy debates. But a survey is a relatively blunt instrument for assessing the subtleties of IK, having well rehearsed drawbacks. It also glosses over contentious political issues. But what more effective way is there of assessing understanding and ideas widely at the grass-roots in a short time frame?
first_indexed 2024-12-13T16:29:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-59df1fad1f3c49cc8e501bd07a23524e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2267-2419
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T16:29:46Z
publishDate 2014-12-01
publisher Laboratoire Éco-anthropologie et Ethnobiologie
record_format Article
series Revue d'ethnoécologie
spelling doaj.art-59df1fad1f3c49cc8e501bd07a23524e2022-12-21T23:38:31ZengLaboratoire Éco-anthropologie et EthnobiologieRevue d'ethnoécologie2267-24192014-12-01610.4000/ethnoecologie.1905Local perceptions of forest, conservation and logging in Papua New GuineaPaul SillitoeThe future of Papua New Guinea's (PNG) extensive forests is of some concern. Local communities may readily sell logging rights to timber companies to fund elusive ‘development’. Alternatively, they may hold the key to forest conservation. It may be possible, if landowners have some notion of managing forest resources, to build on these practices. But according to some commentators they traditionally lack a conservation ethic. In order to advise on forest policy, it is necessary to try and gauge the practices, attitudes and ideas of local people. This accords with current participatory development approaches to consult ‘grassroots’ opinion, as in indigenous knowledge (IK) research, which aims to facilitate interventions by promoting partnership and an awareness of local perspectives. It is indisputable that local people will be well qualified to define problems, and will be ‘experts’ on their forests. The difficulties encountered in formulating generalisations applicable on a large scale present a barrier to IK informing policy, as in the management of logging and promotion of forest conservation. The short-termism of development, politically driven for immediate returns, presents further problems. We need to evolve methods and formulate principles that will allow some reliable local inputs into policy debates. One way to assess local knowledge and aspirations quickly on a nation-wide level is to use surveys. This paper will discuss a rural community survey conducted in PNG to ascertain peoples’ attitudes to forestry, logging and conservation, and inform policy debates. But a survey is a relatively blunt instrument for assessing the subtleties of IK, having well rehearsed drawbacks. It also glosses over contentious political issues. But what more effective way is there of assessing understanding and ideas widely at the grass-roots in a short time frame?http://journals.openedition.org/ethnoecologie/1905Papua New Guinealoggingconservationindigenous (local) knowledgeexpert survey
spellingShingle Paul Sillitoe
Local perceptions of forest, conservation and logging in Papua New Guinea
Revue d'ethnoécologie
Papua New Guinea
logging
conservation
indigenous (local) knowledge
expert survey
title Local perceptions of forest, conservation and logging in Papua New Guinea
title_full Local perceptions of forest, conservation and logging in Papua New Guinea
title_fullStr Local perceptions of forest, conservation and logging in Papua New Guinea
title_full_unstemmed Local perceptions of forest, conservation and logging in Papua New Guinea
title_short Local perceptions of forest, conservation and logging in Papua New Guinea
title_sort local perceptions of forest conservation and logging in papua new guinea
topic Papua New Guinea
logging
conservation
indigenous (local) knowledge
expert survey
url http://journals.openedition.org/ethnoecologie/1905
work_keys_str_mv AT paulsillitoe localperceptionsofforestconservationandlogginginpapuanewguinea