Co-benefits and trade-offs in the water–energy nexus of irrigation modernization in China

There are strong interdependencies between water use in agriculture and energy consumption as water saving technologies can require increased pumping and pressurizing. The Chinese Government includes water efficiency improvement and carbon intensity reduction targets in the 12th Five-Year Plan (5YP....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Roger Cremades, Sabrina G S A Rothausen, Declan Conway, Xiaoxia Zou, Jinxia Wang, Yu’e Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2016-01-01
Series:Environmental Research Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/5/054007
_version_ 1827871217352179712
author Roger Cremades
Sabrina G S A Rothausen
Declan Conway
Xiaoxia Zou
Jinxia Wang
Yu’e Li
author_facet Roger Cremades
Sabrina G S A Rothausen
Declan Conway
Xiaoxia Zou
Jinxia Wang
Yu’e Li
author_sort Roger Cremades
collection DOAJ
description There are strong interdependencies between water use in agriculture and energy consumption as water saving technologies can require increased pumping and pressurizing. The Chinese Government includes water efficiency improvement and carbon intensity reduction targets in the 12th Five-Year Plan (5YP. 2011–2015), yet the links between energy use and irrigation modernization are not always addressed in policy targets. Here we build an original model of the energy embedded in water pumping for irrigated agriculture and its related processes. The model is based on the physical processes of irrigation schemes and the implication of technological developments, comprising all processes from extraction and conveyance of water to its application in the field. The model uses data from government sources to assess policy targets for deployment of irrigation technologies, which aim to reduce water application and contribute to adaptation of Chinese agriculture to climate change. The consequences of policy targets involve co-beneficial outcomes that achieve water and energy savings, or trade-offs in which reduced water application leads to increasing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. We analyze irrigation efficiency and energy use in four significant provinces and nationally, using scenarios based on the targets of the 12th 5YP. At the national scale, we find that expansion of sprinklers and micro-irrigation as outlined in the 5YP would increase GHG emissions from agricultural water use, however, emissions decrease in those provinces with predominant groundwater use and planned expansion of low-pressure pipes. We show that the most costly technologies relate to trade-offs, while co-benefits are generally achieved with less expensive technologies. The investment cost per area of irrigation technology expansion does not greatly affect the outcome in terms of water, but in terms of energy the most expensive technologies are more energy-intensive and produce more emissions. The results show that water supply configuration (proportion of surface to groundwater) largely determines the potential energy savings from reductions in water application. The paper examines the importance of fertigation and highlights briefly some policy implications.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T16:06:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-59e45b3bc5184e1fb3018a05b0d5aa0a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1748-9326
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T16:06:29Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series Environmental Research Letters
spelling doaj.art-59e45b3bc5184e1fb3018a05b0d5aa0a2023-08-09T14:19:09ZengIOP PublishingEnvironmental Research Letters1748-93262016-01-0111505400710.1088/1748-9326/11/5/054007Co-benefits and trade-offs in the water–energy nexus of irrigation modernization in ChinaRoger Cremades0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4514-2462Sabrina G S A Rothausen1Declan Conway2Xiaoxia Zou3Jinxia Wang4Yu’e Li5Climate Service Center Germany (GERICS), Chilehaus Eingang B, Fischertwiete 1, D-20095 Hamburg, Germany; Research Unit Sustainability and Global Change, Departments of Geosciences and Economics, Center for Earth System Research and Sustainability, University of Hamburg , Grindelberg 5, D-20144 Hamburg, GermanyDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen , DenmarkGrantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UKQingdao Agricultural University , No. 700 Changcheng Road, Chengyang, Qingdao, Shandong, People’s Republic of ChinaSchool of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, Peking University , No. 5 Yiheyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100871, People’s Republic of ChinaInstitute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 12 Zhongguancun Nandajie, 100081 Beijing, People’s Republic of ChinaThere are strong interdependencies between water use in agriculture and energy consumption as water saving technologies can require increased pumping and pressurizing. The Chinese Government includes water efficiency improvement and carbon intensity reduction targets in the 12th Five-Year Plan (5YP. 2011–2015), yet the links between energy use and irrigation modernization are not always addressed in policy targets. Here we build an original model of the energy embedded in water pumping for irrigated agriculture and its related processes. The model is based on the physical processes of irrigation schemes and the implication of technological developments, comprising all processes from extraction and conveyance of water to its application in the field. The model uses data from government sources to assess policy targets for deployment of irrigation technologies, which aim to reduce water application and contribute to adaptation of Chinese agriculture to climate change. The consequences of policy targets involve co-beneficial outcomes that achieve water and energy savings, or trade-offs in which reduced water application leads to increasing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. We analyze irrigation efficiency and energy use in four significant provinces and nationally, using scenarios based on the targets of the 12th 5YP. At the national scale, we find that expansion of sprinklers and micro-irrigation as outlined in the 5YP would increase GHG emissions from agricultural water use, however, emissions decrease in those provinces with predominant groundwater use and planned expansion of low-pressure pipes. We show that the most costly technologies relate to trade-offs, while co-benefits are generally achieved with less expensive technologies. The investment cost per area of irrigation technology expansion does not greatly affect the outcome in terms of water, but in terms of energy the most expensive technologies are more energy-intensive and produce more emissions. The results show that water supply configuration (proportion of surface to groundwater) largely determines the potential energy savings from reductions in water application. The paper examines the importance of fertigation and highlights briefly some policy implications.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/5/054007irrigationwaterenergynexustrade-offsChina
spellingShingle Roger Cremades
Sabrina G S A Rothausen
Declan Conway
Xiaoxia Zou
Jinxia Wang
Yu’e Li
Co-benefits and trade-offs in the water–energy nexus of irrigation modernization in China
Environmental Research Letters
irrigation
water
energy
nexus
trade-offs
China
title Co-benefits and trade-offs in the water–energy nexus of irrigation modernization in China
title_full Co-benefits and trade-offs in the water–energy nexus of irrigation modernization in China
title_fullStr Co-benefits and trade-offs in the water–energy nexus of irrigation modernization in China
title_full_unstemmed Co-benefits and trade-offs in the water–energy nexus of irrigation modernization in China
title_short Co-benefits and trade-offs in the water–energy nexus of irrigation modernization in China
title_sort co benefits and trade offs in the water energy nexus of irrigation modernization in china
topic irrigation
water
energy
nexus
trade-offs
China
url https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/5/054007
work_keys_str_mv AT rogercremades cobenefitsandtradeoffsinthewaterenergynexusofirrigationmodernizationinchina
AT sabrinagsarothausen cobenefitsandtradeoffsinthewaterenergynexusofirrigationmodernizationinchina
AT declanconway cobenefitsandtradeoffsinthewaterenergynexusofirrigationmodernizationinchina
AT xiaoxiazou cobenefitsandtradeoffsinthewaterenergynexusofirrigationmodernizationinchina
AT jinxiawang cobenefitsandtradeoffsinthewaterenergynexusofirrigationmodernizationinchina
AT yueli cobenefitsandtradeoffsinthewaterenergynexusofirrigationmodernizationinchina