Comparison of resource use for farmed shrimp in Ecuador, India, Indonesia, Thailand, and Vietnam

Abstract The purpose of this study was to assess the amounts of land, water, energy in fuels, and wild fish for fishmeal and fish oil in feeds required per tonne of harvested, farmed shrimp in five countries producing most of the shrimp destined for the international market. Land use for whiteleg sh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Claude E. Boyd, Robert P. Davis, Aaron A. McNevin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-12-01
Series:Aquaculture, Fish and Fisheries
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/aff2.23
_version_ 1811306371223650304
author Claude E. Boyd
Robert P. Davis
Aaron A. McNevin
author_facet Claude E. Boyd
Robert P. Davis
Aaron A. McNevin
author_sort Claude E. Boyd
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The purpose of this study was to assess the amounts of land, water, energy in fuels, and wild fish for fishmeal and fish oil in feeds required per tonne of harvested, farmed shrimp in five countries producing most of the shrimp destined for the international market. Land use for whiteleg shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei production differed slightly between Indonesia (0.37 ha/t shrimp) and the other four, major shrimp exporting countries – Ecuador, India, Thailand, and Vietnam (0.42–0.46 ha/t shrimp). Total water use was greater in Ecuador (76,800 m3/t) and Indonesia (55,000 m3/t) than in the other three countries (14,000–45,500 m3/t), but most water was saline. Freshwater use was mainly embodied in feed, did not differ among countries, and averaged 6.3% of total water use. Energy use ranged from 56.0 GJ/t (Ecuador) to 98.8 GJ/t (Thailand). All Asian countries had energy use above 75 GJ/t. Wild fish use for fishmeal and fish oil in feeds was greatest in Ecuador (0.891 t/t) and similar in Asian countries (0.612–0.670 t/t). In terms of edible crude protein, whiteleg shrimp was similar to broiler chickens, but more efficient than pigs and beef cattle in land and freshwater use, but greater in energy use than were the three terrestrial meat sources. Compared to L. vannamei, black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon required more land, a greater amount of water, but less energy per tonne of shrimp. Although comparatively small differences in average uses of these primary resources were found among countries, the large variation which was noted among farms in each country suggests that resource use could be improved considerably.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T08:43:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-59e692b2a2404de2aa2868a6f86dee3b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2693-8847
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T08:43:17Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Aquaculture, Fish and Fisheries
spelling doaj.art-59e692b2a2404de2aa2868a6f86dee3b2022-12-22T02:53:49ZengWileyAquaculture, Fish and Fisheries2693-88472021-12-011131510.1002/aff2.23Comparison of resource use for farmed shrimp in Ecuador, India, Indonesia, Thailand, and VietnamClaude E. Boyd0Robert P. Davis1Aaron A. McNevin2School of Fisheries, Aquaculture and Aquatic Sciences Auburn University Auburn Alabama USASchool of Fisheries, Aquaculture and Aquatic Sciences Auburn University Auburn Alabama USAWorld Wildlife Fund Washington, D.C. USAAbstract The purpose of this study was to assess the amounts of land, water, energy in fuels, and wild fish for fishmeal and fish oil in feeds required per tonne of harvested, farmed shrimp in five countries producing most of the shrimp destined for the international market. Land use for whiteleg shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei production differed slightly between Indonesia (0.37 ha/t shrimp) and the other four, major shrimp exporting countries – Ecuador, India, Thailand, and Vietnam (0.42–0.46 ha/t shrimp). Total water use was greater in Ecuador (76,800 m3/t) and Indonesia (55,000 m3/t) than in the other three countries (14,000–45,500 m3/t), but most water was saline. Freshwater use was mainly embodied in feed, did not differ among countries, and averaged 6.3% of total water use. Energy use ranged from 56.0 GJ/t (Ecuador) to 98.8 GJ/t (Thailand). All Asian countries had energy use above 75 GJ/t. Wild fish use for fishmeal and fish oil in feeds was greatest in Ecuador (0.891 t/t) and similar in Asian countries (0.612–0.670 t/t). In terms of edible crude protein, whiteleg shrimp was similar to broiler chickens, but more efficient than pigs and beef cattle in land and freshwater use, but greater in energy use than were the three terrestrial meat sources. Compared to L. vannamei, black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon required more land, a greater amount of water, but less energy per tonne of shrimp. Although comparatively small differences in average uses of these primary resources were found among countries, the large variation which was noted among farms in each country suggests that resource use could be improved considerably.https://doi.org/10.1002/aff2.23environmental sustainabilityLitopenaeus vannameiresource use efficiencyshrimp farmingwild fish use
spellingShingle Claude E. Boyd
Robert P. Davis
Aaron A. McNevin
Comparison of resource use for farmed shrimp in Ecuador, India, Indonesia, Thailand, and Vietnam
Aquaculture, Fish and Fisheries
environmental sustainability
Litopenaeus vannamei
resource use efficiency
shrimp farming
wild fish use
title Comparison of resource use for farmed shrimp in Ecuador, India, Indonesia, Thailand, and Vietnam
title_full Comparison of resource use for farmed shrimp in Ecuador, India, Indonesia, Thailand, and Vietnam
title_fullStr Comparison of resource use for farmed shrimp in Ecuador, India, Indonesia, Thailand, and Vietnam
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of resource use for farmed shrimp in Ecuador, India, Indonesia, Thailand, and Vietnam
title_short Comparison of resource use for farmed shrimp in Ecuador, India, Indonesia, Thailand, and Vietnam
title_sort comparison of resource use for farmed shrimp in ecuador india indonesia thailand and vietnam
topic environmental sustainability
Litopenaeus vannamei
resource use efficiency
shrimp farming
wild fish use
url https://doi.org/10.1002/aff2.23
work_keys_str_mv AT claudeeboyd comparisonofresourceuseforfarmedshrimpinecuadorindiaindonesiathailandandvietnam
AT robertpdavis comparisonofresourceuseforfarmedshrimpinecuadorindiaindonesiathailandandvietnam
AT aaronamcnevin comparisonofresourceuseforfarmedshrimpinecuadorindiaindonesiathailandandvietnam