A Comparative Study of Different Protocols for Isolation of Murine Neutrophils from Bone Marrow and Spleen

Neutrophils are considered as the main player in innate immunity. In the last few years, it has been shown that they are involved in different physiological conditions and diseases. However, progress in the field of neutrophil biology is relatively slow due to existing difficulties in neutrophil iso...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Khetam Sounbuli, Ludmila A. Alekseeva, Oleg V. Markov, Nadezhda L. Mironova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-12-01
Series:International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/24/24/17273
_version_ 1797380764146335744
author Khetam Sounbuli
Ludmila A. Alekseeva
Oleg V. Markov
Nadezhda L. Mironova
author_facet Khetam Sounbuli
Ludmila A. Alekseeva
Oleg V. Markov
Nadezhda L. Mironova
author_sort Khetam Sounbuli
collection DOAJ
description Neutrophils are considered as the main player in innate immunity. In the last few years, it has been shown that they are involved in different physiological conditions and diseases. However, progress in the field of neutrophil biology is relatively slow due to existing difficulties in neutrophil isolation and maintenance in culture. Here we compare four protocols based on density-gradient and immunomagnetic methods for isolation of murine neutrophils from bone marrow and spleen. Neutrophil isolation was performed using Ficoll 1.077/1.119 g/mL density gradient, Ficoll 1.083/1.090/1.110 g/mL density gradient and immunomagnetic method of negative and positive selection. The different protocols were compared with respect to sample purity, cell viability, yield, and cost. The functionality of isolated neutrophils was checked by NETosis analysis and neutrophil oxidative burst test. Obtained data revealed that given purity/yield/viability/cost ratio the protocol based on cell centrifugation on Ficoll 1.077/1.119 g/mL density gradient is recommended for isolation of neutrophils from bone marrow, whereas immunomagnetic method of positive selection using Dynabeads is recommended for isolation of splenic neutrophils.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T20:41:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-59f7d8bc76d542379e7b112442fbd935
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1661-6596
1422-0067
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T20:41:46Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series International Journal of Molecular Sciences
spelling doaj.art-59f7d8bc76d542379e7b112442fbd9352023-12-22T14:13:52ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences1661-65961422-00672023-12-0124241727310.3390/ijms242417273A Comparative Study of Different Protocols for Isolation of Murine Neutrophils from Bone Marrow and SpleenKhetam Sounbuli0Ludmila A. Alekseeva1Oleg V. Markov2Nadezhda L. Mironova3Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine SB RAS, Lavrentiev Ave. 8, 630090 Novosibirsk, RussiaInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine SB RAS, Lavrentiev Ave. 8, 630090 Novosibirsk, RussiaInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine SB RAS, Lavrentiev Ave. 8, 630090 Novosibirsk, RussiaInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine SB RAS, Lavrentiev Ave. 8, 630090 Novosibirsk, RussiaNeutrophils are considered as the main player in innate immunity. In the last few years, it has been shown that they are involved in different physiological conditions and diseases. However, progress in the field of neutrophil biology is relatively slow due to existing difficulties in neutrophil isolation and maintenance in culture. Here we compare four protocols based on density-gradient and immunomagnetic methods for isolation of murine neutrophils from bone marrow and spleen. Neutrophil isolation was performed using Ficoll 1.077/1.119 g/mL density gradient, Ficoll 1.083/1.090/1.110 g/mL density gradient and immunomagnetic method of negative and positive selection. The different protocols were compared with respect to sample purity, cell viability, yield, and cost. The functionality of isolated neutrophils was checked by NETosis analysis and neutrophil oxidative burst test. Obtained data revealed that given purity/yield/viability/cost ratio the protocol based on cell centrifugation on Ficoll 1.077/1.119 g/mL density gradient is recommended for isolation of neutrophils from bone marrow, whereas immunomagnetic method of positive selection using Dynabeads is recommended for isolation of splenic neutrophils.https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/24/24/17273neutrophil isolationFicoll density gradientimmunomagnetic separationpositive selectionnegative selection
spellingShingle Khetam Sounbuli
Ludmila A. Alekseeva
Oleg V. Markov
Nadezhda L. Mironova
A Comparative Study of Different Protocols for Isolation of Murine Neutrophils from Bone Marrow and Spleen
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
neutrophil isolation
Ficoll density gradient
immunomagnetic separation
positive selection
negative selection
title A Comparative Study of Different Protocols for Isolation of Murine Neutrophils from Bone Marrow and Spleen
title_full A Comparative Study of Different Protocols for Isolation of Murine Neutrophils from Bone Marrow and Spleen
title_fullStr A Comparative Study of Different Protocols for Isolation of Murine Neutrophils from Bone Marrow and Spleen
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study of Different Protocols for Isolation of Murine Neutrophils from Bone Marrow and Spleen
title_short A Comparative Study of Different Protocols for Isolation of Murine Neutrophils from Bone Marrow and Spleen
title_sort comparative study of different protocols for isolation of murine neutrophils from bone marrow and spleen
topic neutrophil isolation
Ficoll density gradient
immunomagnetic separation
positive selection
negative selection
url https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/24/24/17273
work_keys_str_mv AT khetamsounbuli acomparativestudyofdifferentprotocolsforisolationofmurineneutrophilsfrombonemarrowandspleen
AT ludmilaaalekseeva acomparativestudyofdifferentprotocolsforisolationofmurineneutrophilsfrombonemarrowandspleen
AT olegvmarkov acomparativestudyofdifferentprotocolsforisolationofmurineneutrophilsfrombonemarrowandspleen
AT nadezhdalmironova acomparativestudyofdifferentprotocolsforisolationofmurineneutrophilsfrombonemarrowandspleen
AT khetamsounbuli comparativestudyofdifferentprotocolsforisolationofmurineneutrophilsfrombonemarrowandspleen
AT ludmilaaalekseeva comparativestudyofdifferentprotocolsforisolationofmurineneutrophilsfrombonemarrowandspleen
AT olegvmarkov comparativestudyofdifferentprotocolsforisolationofmurineneutrophilsfrombonemarrowandspleen
AT nadezhdalmironova comparativestudyofdifferentprotocolsforisolationofmurineneutrophilsfrombonemarrowandspleen