Performance and Intestinal Profiles of Tegal Duck Fed Ration Supplemented with Prebiotics
This research was aimed to determine the effects of prebiotics on performance and gastrointestinal profiles of Tegal ducks. One hundred two-month-old male Tegal ducks were distributed into 5 treatment groups; R0= control; R1= FOS; R2= MOS; R3= Inulin; and R4= natural prebiotic (water hyacinth/Eichho...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
IPB University
2018-04-01
|
| Series: | Tropical Animal Science Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://jli.journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/tasj/article/view/20946 |
| _version_ | 1818876509934321664 |
|---|---|
| author | N. Iriyanti B. Hartoyo S. Suhermiyati |
| author_facet | N. Iriyanti B. Hartoyo S. Suhermiyati |
| author_sort | N. Iriyanti |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This research was aimed to determine the effects of prebiotics on performance and gastrointestinal profiles of Tegal ducks. One hundred two-month-old male Tegal ducks were distributed into 5 treatment groups; R0= control; R1= FOS; R2= MOS; R3= Inulin; and R4= natural prebiotic (water hyacinth/Eichhornia crassipes). The prebiotics were given at 0.2% of the total feed (w/w). The observed variables were performances and gastrointestinal profiles. This study used a completely randomized design and continued with honestly significant difference test. Performance (live weight, body weight gain, and feed intake) and intestinal profile (percentage weights of intestine, gizzard, crop, and pancreas) of ducks were not significantly affected by prebiotic supplementation in feed. FOS prebiotic and natural prebiotic from water hyacinth showed increased (P<0.05) the percentage of carcass and cecum weight compared to the other treatments. In conclusion, the use of different prebiotics resulted in relatively similar performances and digestive tract profiles except the percentage of carcass and cecum weight that increased by 4.5% and 36.67%, respectively, with the supplementation of either FOS or water hyacinth. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-19T13:43:32Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-5a00f35391d241b5a63b94e5ab1f6197 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2615-787X 2615-790X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-19T13:43:32Z |
| publishDate | 2018-04-01 |
| publisher | IPB University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Tropical Animal Science Journal |
| spelling | doaj.art-5a00f35391d241b5a63b94e5ab1f61972022-12-21T20:18:55ZengIPB UniversityTropical Animal Science Journal2615-787X2615-790X2018-04-0141110.5398/tasj.2018.41.1.1513840Performance and Intestinal Profiles of Tegal Duck Fed Ration Supplemented with PrebioticsN. Iriyanti0B. Hartoyo1S. Suhermiyati2Animal Nutrition Laboratory, Faculty of Animal Science, Jenderal Soedirman UniversityAnimal Nutrition Laboratory, Faculty of Animal Science, Jenderal Soedirman UniversityAnimal Nutrition Laboratory, Faculty of Animal Science, Jenderal Soedirman UniversityThis research was aimed to determine the effects of prebiotics on performance and gastrointestinal profiles of Tegal ducks. One hundred two-month-old male Tegal ducks were distributed into 5 treatment groups; R0= control; R1= FOS; R2= MOS; R3= Inulin; and R4= natural prebiotic (water hyacinth/Eichhornia crassipes). The prebiotics were given at 0.2% of the total feed (w/w). The observed variables were performances and gastrointestinal profiles. This study used a completely randomized design and continued with honestly significant difference test. Performance (live weight, body weight gain, and feed intake) and intestinal profile (percentage weights of intestine, gizzard, crop, and pancreas) of ducks were not significantly affected by prebiotic supplementation in feed. FOS prebiotic and natural prebiotic from water hyacinth showed increased (P<0.05) the percentage of carcass and cecum weight compared to the other treatments. In conclusion, the use of different prebiotics resulted in relatively similar performances and digestive tract profiles except the percentage of carcass and cecum weight that increased by 4.5% and 36.67%, respectively, with the supplementation of either FOS or water hyacinth.https://jli.journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/tasj/article/view/20946prebioticTegal duckperformancegastrointestinal profilewater hyacinth |
| spellingShingle | N. Iriyanti B. Hartoyo S. Suhermiyati Performance and Intestinal Profiles of Tegal Duck Fed Ration Supplemented with Prebiotics Tropical Animal Science Journal prebiotic Tegal duck performance gastrointestinal profile water hyacinth |
| title | Performance and Intestinal Profiles of Tegal Duck Fed Ration Supplemented with Prebiotics |
| title_full | Performance and Intestinal Profiles of Tegal Duck Fed Ration Supplemented with Prebiotics |
| title_fullStr | Performance and Intestinal Profiles of Tegal Duck Fed Ration Supplemented with Prebiotics |
| title_full_unstemmed | Performance and Intestinal Profiles of Tegal Duck Fed Ration Supplemented with Prebiotics |
| title_short | Performance and Intestinal Profiles of Tegal Duck Fed Ration Supplemented with Prebiotics |
| title_sort | performance and intestinal profiles of tegal duck fed ration supplemented with prebiotics |
| topic | prebiotic Tegal duck performance gastrointestinal profile water hyacinth |
| url | https://jli.journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/tasj/article/view/20946 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT niriyanti performanceandintestinalprofilesoftegalduckfedrationsupplementedwithprebiotics AT bhartoyo performanceandintestinalprofilesoftegalduckfedrationsupplementedwithprebiotics AT ssuhermiyati performanceandintestinalprofilesoftegalduckfedrationsupplementedwithprebiotics |