Response to Lindsey Macdonald's 'We are All Housewives: Universal Basic Income as Wages for Housework'
What types of subjectivities and political actors are emerging around calls for UBI? Lindsey Macdonald’s article, “We Are All Housewives,” eloquently speaks to the concept of universality, while also situating socialist-feminist demands for UBI within specific activist traditions. I pose questions a...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Cultural Studies Association
2019-05-01
|
| Series: | Lateral |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.25158/L8.1.9 |
| _version_ | 1818775719730216960 |
|---|---|
| author | Tai Neilson |
| author_facet | Tai Neilson |
| author_sort | Tai Neilson |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | What types of subjectivities and political actors are emerging around calls for UBI? Lindsey Macdonald’s article, “We Are All Housewives,” eloquently speaks to the concept of universality, while also situating socialist-feminist demands for UBI within specific activist traditions. I pose questions about the distinctions between different socialist arguments for UBI and the political groups that advocate for its implementation: first, what are the differences between autonomist and feminist proposals; and, second, how might we distinguish and evaluate organizations that are fighting for a feminist-socialist UBI? |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-18T11:01:31Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-5a0caabbf34341d88b0f47ba151aab74 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2469-4053 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-18T11:01:31Z |
| publishDate | 2019-05-01 |
| publisher | Cultural Studies Association |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Lateral |
| spelling | doaj.art-5a0caabbf34341d88b0f47ba151aab742022-12-21T21:10:12ZengCultural Studies AssociationLateral2469-40532019-05-018110.25158/L8.1.9http://csalateral.org/section/universal-basic-income/response-to-macdonald-we-are-all-housewives-neilson/Response to Lindsey Macdonald's 'We are All Housewives: Universal Basic Income as Wages for Housework'Tai NeilsonWhat types of subjectivities and political actors are emerging around calls for UBI? Lindsey Macdonald’s article, “We Are All Housewives,” eloquently speaks to the concept of universality, while also situating socialist-feminist demands for UBI within specific activist traditions. I pose questions about the distinctions between different socialist arguments for UBI and the political groups that advocate for its implementation: first, what are the differences between autonomist and feminist proposals; and, second, how might we distinguish and evaluate organizations that are fighting for a feminist-socialist UBI?https://doi.org/10.25158/L8.1.9universal basic incomefeminismgendermarxist autonomism |
| spellingShingle | Tai Neilson Response to Lindsey Macdonald's 'We are All Housewives: Universal Basic Income as Wages for Housework' Lateral universal basic income feminism gender marxist autonomism |
| title | Response to Lindsey Macdonald's 'We are All Housewives: Universal Basic Income as Wages for Housework' |
| title_full | Response to Lindsey Macdonald's 'We are All Housewives: Universal Basic Income as Wages for Housework' |
| title_fullStr | Response to Lindsey Macdonald's 'We are All Housewives: Universal Basic Income as Wages for Housework' |
| title_full_unstemmed | Response to Lindsey Macdonald's 'We are All Housewives: Universal Basic Income as Wages for Housework' |
| title_short | Response to Lindsey Macdonald's 'We are All Housewives: Universal Basic Income as Wages for Housework' |
| title_sort | response to lindsey macdonald s we are all housewives universal basic income as wages for housework |
| topic | universal basic income feminism gender marxist autonomism |
| url | https://doi.org/10.25158/L8.1.9 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT taineilson responsetolindseymacdonaldsweareallhousewivesuniversalbasicincomeaswagesforhousework |