Research into <i>Neospora caninum</i>—What Have We Learnt in the Last Thirty Years?

Background: <i>Neospora caninum</i> has been recognised world-wide, first as a disease of dogs, then as an important cause of abortions in cattle for the past thirty years. Over that time period, there have been improvements in the diagnosis of infection and abortion, new tests have been...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael P. Reichel, Lloyd C. Wahl, John T. Ellis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-06-01
Series:Pathogens
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/9/6/505
_version_ 1827714406437355520
author Michael P. Reichel
Lloyd C. Wahl
John T. Ellis
author_facet Michael P. Reichel
Lloyd C. Wahl
John T. Ellis
author_sort Michael P. Reichel
collection DOAJ
description Background: <i>Neospora caninum</i> has been recognised world-wide, first as a disease of dogs, then as an important cause of abortions in cattle for the past thirty years. Over that time period, there have been improvements in the diagnosis of infection and abortion, new tests have been developed and validated, and it is timely to review progress to date. Methods: Bibliometric methods were used to identify major trends and research topics present in the published literature on <i>N. caninum</i>. The tools used were SWIFT-Review, VOSviewer and SciMAT, along with the published papers found in the MEDLINE, Dimensions and Web of Science databases. A systematic review of the published <i>Neospora</i> literature (<i>n</i> = 2933) was also carried out via MEDLINE and systematically appraised for publications relevant to the pathogenesis, pathology and diagnosis of <i>Neospora</i> abortions. Results: A total of 92 publications were included in the final analysis and grouped into four main time periods. In these four different time periods, the main research themes were “dogs”, “abortion”, “seroprevalence” and “infection”. Diagnostics, including PCR, dominated the first two time periods, with an increased focus on transmission and abortions, and its risk factors in cattle. Conclusions: Longitudinal analyses indicated that the main themes were consistently investigated over the last 30 years through a wide range of studies, with evolving emphasis initially on dogs and diagnostic test development, followed by application to cattle, the identification of the risk factors leading to abortion, and in the latter time periods, an understanding of the immunity and a search for vaccines.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T18:56:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5a10324ee4254dceb8a3e041a50e7046
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-0817
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T18:56:15Z
publishDate 2020-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Pathogens
spelling doaj.art-5a10324ee4254dceb8a3e041a50e70462023-11-20T04:43:24ZengMDPI AGPathogens2076-08172020-06-019650510.3390/pathogens9060505Research into <i>Neospora caninum</i>—What Have We Learnt in the Last Thirty Years?Michael P. Reichel0Lloyd C. Wahl1John T. Ellis2Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong, ChinaJockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong, ChinaSchool of Life Sciences, University of Technology Sydney, P.O. Box 123, Broadway, NSW 2007, AustraliaBackground: <i>Neospora caninum</i> has been recognised world-wide, first as a disease of dogs, then as an important cause of abortions in cattle for the past thirty years. Over that time period, there have been improvements in the diagnosis of infection and abortion, new tests have been developed and validated, and it is timely to review progress to date. Methods: Bibliometric methods were used to identify major trends and research topics present in the published literature on <i>N. caninum</i>. The tools used were SWIFT-Review, VOSviewer and SciMAT, along with the published papers found in the MEDLINE, Dimensions and Web of Science databases. A systematic review of the published <i>Neospora</i> literature (<i>n</i> = 2933) was also carried out via MEDLINE and systematically appraised for publications relevant to the pathogenesis, pathology and diagnosis of <i>Neospora</i> abortions. Results: A total of 92 publications were included in the final analysis and grouped into four main time periods. In these four different time periods, the main research themes were “dogs”, “abortion”, “seroprevalence” and “infection”. Diagnostics, including PCR, dominated the first two time periods, with an increased focus on transmission and abortions, and its risk factors in cattle. Conclusions: Longitudinal analyses indicated that the main themes were consistently investigated over the last 30 years through a wide range of studies, with evolving emphasis initially on dogs and diagnostic test development, followed by application to cattle, the identification of the risk factors leading to abortion, and in the latter time periods, an understanding of the immunity and a search for vaccines.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/9/6/505<i>Neospora caninum</i>dogscattleabortionsdiagnosispathogenesis
spellingShingle Michael P. Reichel
Lloyd C. Wahl
John T. Ellis
Research into <i>Neospora caninum</i>—What Have We Learnt in the Last Thirty Years?
Pathogens
<i>Neospora caninum</i>
dogs
cattle
abortions
diagnosis
pathogenesis
title Research into <i>Neospora caninum</i>—What Have We Learnt in the Last Thirty Years?
title_full Research into <i>Neospora caninum</i>—What Have We Learnt in the Last Thirty Years?
title_fullStr Research into <i>Neospora caninum</i>—What Have We Learnt in the Last Thirty Years?
title_full_unstemmed Research into <i>Neospora caninum</i>—What Have We Learnt in the Last Thirty Years?
title_short Research into <i>Neospora caninum</i>—What Have We Learnt in the Last Thirty Years?
title_sort research into i neospora caninum i what have we learnt in the last thirty years
topic <i>Neospora caninum</i>
dogs
cattle
abortions
diagnosis
pathogenesis
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/9/6/505
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelpreichel researchintoineosporacaninumiwhathavewelearntinthelastthirtyyears
AT lloydcwahl researchintoineosporacaninumiwhathavewelearntinthelastthirtyyears
AT johntellis researchintoineosporacaninumiwhathavewelearntinthelastthirtyyears