The dynamics of cooperation in asymmetric sub-populations

Sacrificing personal benefits for a common good is at odds with the fundamental principle of Darwinian evolution: if only the fittest survives, then there should be no place for cooperation. But cooperative behavior actually abounds, and constitutes one of the most persistent and fascinating puzzles...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: H Guo, X Li, K Hu, X Dai, D Jia, S Boccaletti, M Perc, Z Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2020-01-01
Series:New Journal of Physics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ab9e89
_version_ 1797750414077067264
author H Guo
X Li
K Hu
X Dai
D Jia
S Boccaletti
M Perc
Z Wang
author_facet H Guo
X Li
K Hu
X Dai
D Jia
S Boccaletti
M Perc
Z Wang
author_sort H Guo
collection DOAJ
description Sacrificing personal benefits for a common good is at odds with the fundamental principle of Darwinian evolution: if only the fittest survives, then there should be no place for cooperation. But cooperative behavior actually abounds, and constitutes one of the most persistent and fascinating puzzles of nature. One solution to this puzzle is network reciprocity, where the collective dynamics of cooperators affords them protection against invading defectors. Commonly, however, such a competition does not unfold in isolation. Populations are often divided into sub-populations, with different evolutionary rules describing the interactions between them. Here we propose and study a paradigmatic model that captures the essence of this setup. Specifically, if two players belong to the same sub-population, they play the prisoner’s dilemma game. If not, they play either the harmony game, the snowdrift game, the stag-hunt game, or the prisoner’s dilemma game. Due to such an asymmetry in the interactions across sub-populations, a fascinating evolutionary dynamics sets up that greatly expands the survivability of cooperators. For instance, when the harmony game applies, cyclic dominance spontaneously emerges, wherein cooperators in one sub-population become predators of defectors in the other sub-population. One also may observe self-organized segregation, wherein both sub-populations maintain a mixed state of cooperators and defectors. As a general rule, we show that the lower the dilemma strength between sub-populations, the more abundant the cooperative strategy in the entire population. Results are confirmed by means of Monte Carlo simulations with pair approximation method, which reveals a rich plethora of novel and generally valid paths to cooperation.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T16:32:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5a2d8aca2c8a4b47bf4d2607f698f178
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1367-2630
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T16:32:21Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series New Journal of Physics
spelling doaj.art-5a2d8aca2c8a4b47bf4d2607f698f1782023-08-08T15:25:21ZengIOP PublishingNew Journal of Physics1367-26302020-01-0122808301510.1088/1367-2630/ab9e89The dynamics of cooperation in asymmetric sub-populationsH Guo0X Li1K Hu2X Dai3D Jia4S Boccaletti5M Perc6https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3087-541XZ Wang7School of Mechanical Engineering and Center for OPTical IMagery Analysis and Learning (OPTIMAL), Northwestern Polytechnical University , Xi’an 710072, People’s Republic of ChinaSchool of Computer Science and Center for OPTical IMagery Analysis and Learning (OPTIMAL), Northwestern Polytechnical University , Xi’an 710072, People’s Republic of ChinaDepartment of Statistics, School of Statistics and Mathematics, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics , Kunming, Yunnan 650221, People’s Republic of ChinaSchool of Mechanical Engineering and Center for OPTical IMagery Analysis and Learning (OPTIMAL), Northwestern Polytechnical University , Xi’an 710072, People’s Republic of ChinaSchool of Mechanical Engineering and Center for OPTical IMagery Analysis and Learning (OPTIMAL), Northwestern Polytechnical University , Xi’an 710072, People’s Republic of ChinaUnmanned Systems Research Institute, Northwestern Polytechnical University , Xi’an 710072, People’s Republic of China; Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (National Research University) , 9 Institutskiy per., Dolgoprudny, Moscow Region, 141701, RussiaFaculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Maribor , Koroška cesta 160, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia; Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University , Taichung, Taiwan; Complexity Science Hub Vienna , Josefstädterstraße 39, 1080 Vienna, AustriaSchool of Mechanical Engineering and Center for OPTical IMagery Analysis and Learning (OPTIMAL), Northwestern Polytechnical University , Xi’an 710072, People’s Republic of ChinaSacrificing personal benefits for a common good is at odds with the fundamental principle of Darwinian evolution: if only the fittest survives, then there should be no place for cooperation. But cooperative behavior actually abounds, and constitutes one of the most persistent and fascinating puzzles of nature. One solution to this puzzle is network reciprocity, where the collective dynamics of cooperators affords them protection against invading defectors. Commonly, however, such a competition does not unfold in isolation. Populations are often divided into sub-populations, with different evolutionary rules describing the interactions between them. Here we propose and study a paradigmatic model that captures the essence of this setup. Specifically, if two players belong to the same sub-population, they play the prisoner’s dilemma game. If not, they play either the harmony game, the snowdrift game, the stag-hunt game, or the prisoner’s dilemma game. Due to such an asymmetry in the interactions across sub-populations, a fascinating evolutionary dynamics sets up that greatly expands the survivability of cooperators. For instance, when the harmony game applies, cyclic dominance spontaneously emerges, wherein cooperators in one sub-population become predators of defectors in the other sub-population. One also may observe self-organized segregation, wherein both sub-populations maintain a mixed state of cooperators and defectors. As a general rule, we show that the lower the dilemma strength between sub-populations, the more abundant the cooperative strategy in the entire population. Results are confirmed by means of Monte Carlo simulations with pair approximation method, which reveals a rich plethora of novel and generally valid paths to cooperation.https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ab9e89social dilemmacyclic dominancemixed gamesasymmetric sub-populations
spellingShingle H Guo
X Li
K Hu
X Dai
D Jia
S Boccaletti
M Perc
Z Wang
The dynamics of cooperation in asymmetric sub-populations
New Journal of Physics
social dilemma
cyclic dominance
mixed games
asymmetric sub-populations
title The dynamics of cooperation in asymmetric sub-populations
title_full The dynamics of cooperation in asymmetric sub-populations
title_fullStr The dynamics of cooperation in asymmetric sub-populations
title_full_unstemmed The dynamics of cooperation in asymmetric sub-populations
title_short The dynamics of cooperation in asymmetric sub-populations
title_sort dynamics of cooperation in asymmetric sub populations
topic social dilemma
cyclic dominance
mixed games
asymmetric sub-populations
url https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ab9e89
work_keys_str_mv AT hguo thedynamicsofcooperationinasymmetricsubpopulations
AT xli thedynamicsofcooperationinasymmetricsubpopulations
AT khu thedynamicsofcooperationinasymmetricsubpopulations
AT xdai thedynamicsofcooperationinasymmetricsubpopulations
AT djia thedynamicsofcooperationinasymmetricsubpopulations
AT sboccaletti thedynamicsofcooperationinasymmetricsubpopulations
AT mperc thedynamicsofcooperationinasymmetricsubpopulations
AT zwang thedynamicsofcooperationinasymmetricsubpopulations
AT hguo dynamicsofcooperationinasymmetricsubpopulations
AT xli dynamicsofcooperationinasymmetricsubpopulations
AT khu dynamicsofcooperationinasymmetricsubpopulations
AT xdai dynamicsofcooperationinasymmetricsubpopulations
AT djia dynamicsofcooperationinasymmetricsubpopulations
AT sboccaletti dynamicsofcooperationinasymmetricsubpopulations
AT mperc dynamicsofcooperationinasymmetricsubpopulations
AT zwang dynamicsofcooperationinasymmetricsubpopulations