From a long-term dynamic perspective: how should internal carbon pricing be implemented?
Internal carbon pricing has the potential to positively influence enterprises’ carbon emissions. However, the strategies for implementing internal carbon pricing for enterprises and internal organizations remain unclear. In this study, employing a differential game research methodology, we design th...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023-12-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Energy Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenrg.2023.1304272/full |
| _version_ | 1827395979066736640 |
|---|---|
| author | Liu Yanfei Liu Yanfei Zhu Hejie Bai E Li Long |
| author_facet | Liu Yanfei Liu Yanfei Zhu Hejie Bai E Li Long |
| author_sort | Liu Yanfei |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Internal carbon pricing has the potential to positively influence enterprises’ carbon emissions. However, the strategies for implementing internal carbon pricing for enterprises and internal organizations remain unclear. In this study, employing a differential game research methodology, we design three implementation strategies for internal carbon pricing from a dynamic time perspective. Through comparative research and numerical analysis of these three different strategies’ effects on the changes in enterprise carbon emission reduction and goodwill, we find that for both enterprises’ carbon emission reduction and goodwill, Model C (implementing secondary investment for internal carbon fee collection) is optimal when the proportion of internal organizational revenue allocation is high and the proportion coefficient of internal carbon fee collection is low. When the proportion coefficient of internal carbon fee collection meets certain conditions, it makes the total profit of system under model C (implementing secondary investment for internal carbon fee collection) larger than the other two strategies. Due to short-sighted behavior, both enterprises’ profits and carbon emissions gradually decrease, leading to the internal carbon prices of enterprises under the three strategies will approach a stable value. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T18:42:49Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-5a4ddccc985640a89e9507e2d7b67d45 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2296-598X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T18:42:49Z |
| publishDate | 2023-12-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Frontiers in Energy Research |
| spelling | doaj.art-5a4ddccc985640a89e9507e2d7b67d452023-12-29T04:17:07ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Energy Research2296-598X2023-12-011110.3389/fenrg.2023.13042721304272From a long-term dynamic perspective: how should internal carbon pricing be implemented?Liu Yanfei0Liu Yanfei1Zhu Hejie2Bai E3Li Long4School of Management, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin, ChinaSchool of Energy and Civil Engineering, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin, ChinaSchool of Management, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin, ChinaSchool of Management, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin, ChinaSchool of Energy and Civil Engineering, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin, ChinaInternal carbon pricing has the potential to positively influence enterprises’ carbon emissions. However, the strategies for implementing internal carbon pricing for enterprises and internal organizations remain unclear. In this study, employing a differential game research methodology, we design three implementation strategies for internal carbon pricing from a dynamic time perspective. Through comparative research and numerical analysis of these three different strategies’ effects on the changes in enterprise carbon emission reduction and goodwill, we find that for both enterprises’ carbon emission reduction and goodwill, Model C (implementing secondary investment for internal carbon fee collection) is optimal when the proportion of internal organizational revenue allocation is high and the proportion coefficient of internal carbon fee collection is low. When the proportion coefficient of internal carbon fee collection meets certain conditions, it makes the total profit of system under model C (implementing secondary investment for internal carbon fee collection) larger than the other two strategies. Due to short-sighted behavior, both enterprises’ profits and carbon emissions gradually decrease, leading to the internal carbon prices of enterprises under the three strategies will approach a stable value.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenrg.2023.1304272/fullinternal carbon pricingdifferential gamegoodwillenterprise carbon reduction emissionscarbon emission |
| spellingShingle | Liu Yanfei Liu Yanfei Zhu Hejie Bai E Li Long From a long-term dynamic perspective: how should internal carbon pricing be implemented? Frontiers in Energy Research internal carbon pricing differential game goodwill enterprise carbon reduction emissions carbon emission |
| title | From a long-term dynamic perspective: how should internal carbon pricing be implemented? |
| title_full | From a long-term dynamic perspective: how should internal carbon pricing be implemented? |
| title_fullStr | From a long-term dynamic perspective: how should internal carbon pricing be implemented? |
| title_full_unstemmed | From a long-term dynamic perspective: how should internal carbon pricing be implemented? |
| title_short | From a long-term dynamic perspective: how should internal carbon pricing be implemented? |
| title_sort | from a long term dynamic perspective how should internal carbon pricing be implemented |
| topic | internal carbon pricing differential game goodwill enterprise carbon reduction emissions carbon emission |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenrg.2023.1304272/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT liuyanfei fromalongtermdynamicperspectivehowshouldinternalcarbonpricingbeimplemented AT liuyanfei fromalongtermdynamicperspectivehowshouldinternalcarbonpricingbeimplemented AT zhuhejie fromalongtermdynamicperspectivehowshouldinternalcarbonpricingbeimplemented AT baie fromalongtermdynamicperspectivehowshouldinternalcarbonpricingbeimplemented AT lilong fromalongtermdynamicperspectivehowshouldinternalcarbonpricingbeimplemented |