Public policy, rationality and reason
This work suggests the incorporation of practical reason in the design, implementation and evaluation of public policies, alongside instrumental rationality. It takes two proposals that today point in this direction: Rawls distinction between reasonable (practical reason) and rational (instrumental...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
Universidad Panamericana
2015-07-01
|
| Series: | Tópicos |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://topicosojs.up.edu.mx/ojs/index.php/topicos/article/view/752 |
| _version_ | 1818216166122848256 |
|---|---|
| author | Rodolfo Canto Sáenz |
| author_facet | Rodolfo Canto Sáenz |
| author_sort | Rodolfo Canto Sáenz |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This work suggests the incorporation of practical reason in the design, implementation and evaluation of public policies, alongside instrumental rationality. It takes two proposals that today point in this direction: Rawls distinction between reasonable (practical reason) and rational (instrumental reason) and what this author calls the CI Procedure (categorical imperative procedure) and Habermas model of deliberative democracy. The main conclusion is that the analysis of public policies can not be limited to rather narrow limits of science, but requires the contribution of political and moral philosophy. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-12T06:47:39Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-5a5af0ef51da4e1cb8cae9e915f8ec0e |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0188-6649 2007-8498 |
| language | Spanish |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-12T06:47:39Z |
| publishDate | 2015-07-01 |
| publisher | Universidad Panamericana |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Tópicos |
| spelling | doaj.art-5a5af0ef51da4e1cb8cae9e915f8ec0e2022-12-22T00:34:08ZspaUniversidad PanamericanaTópicos0188-66492007-84982015-07-0104925929010.21555/top.v0i49.752712Public policy, rationality and reasonRodolfo Canto SáenzThis work suggests the incorporation of practical reason in the design, implementation and evaluation of public policies, alongside instrumental rationality. It takes two proposals that today point in this direction: Rawls distinction between reasonable (practical reason) and rational (instrumental reason) and what this author calls the CI Procedure (categorical imperative procedure) and Habermas model of deliberative democracy. The main conclusion is that the analysis of public policies can not be limited to rather narrow limits of science, but requires the contribution of political and moral philosophy.http://topicosojs.up.edu.mx/ojs/index.php/topicos/article/view/752Políticas públicas, racionalidad instrumental, razonabilidad, Procedimiento IC, política deliberativa |
| spellingShingle | Rodolfo Canto Sáenz Public policy, rationality and reason Tópicos Políticas públicas, racionalidad instrumental, razonabilidad, Procedimiento IC, política deliberativa |
| title | Public policy, rationality and reason |
| title_full | Public policy, rationality and reason |
| title_fullStr | Public policy, rationality and reason |
| title_full_unstemmed | Public policy, rationality and reason |
| title_short | Public policy, rationality and reason |
| title_sort | public policy rationality and reason |
| topic | Políticas públicas, racionalidad instrumental, razonabilidad, Procedimiento IC, política deliberativa |
| url | http://topicosojs.up.edu.mx/ojs/index.php/topicos/article/view/752 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rodolfocantosaenz publicpolicyrationalityandreason |