Parameters for the depth of the ocean’s productive layer

Here we compare various parameters that are used to define the depth of the ocean’s productive layer, the euphotic zone, during the initiation of the spring phytoplankton bloom in the North Atlantic (47°N/20°W). These are (1) the compensation depth (Zc, where gross photosynthesis balances autotrophi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: John F. Marra, W. Sean Chamberlin, Carol A. Knudson, W. Joseph Rhea, Cheng Ho
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Marine Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2023.1052307/full
_version_ 1797853316398448640
author John F. Marra
John F. Marra
W. Sean Chamberlin
Carol A. Knudson
W. Joseph Rhea
Cheng Ho
author_facet John F. Marra
John F. Marra
W. Sean Chamberlin
Carol A. Knudson
W. Joseph Rhea
Cheng Ho
author_sort John F. Marra
collection DOAJ
description Here we compare various parameters that are used to define the depth of the ocean’s productive layer, the euphotic zone, during the initiation of the spring phytoplankton bloom in the North Atlantic (47°N/20°W). These are (1) the compensation depth (Zc, where gross photosynthesis balances autotrophic respiration), (2) the depth horizon of 1% of surface photosynthetic active irradiance (Ed(0-,PAR), (3) depth horizon of 1% of surface Ed(488), and (4) the depth of the bottom of the fluorescence maximum. We also use two related parameters, the depth of the mixed layer and the ratio of integral gross production to integral respiration as a scaling factor for a proxy for the critical depth. Over the course of the observational period (25 April - 7 May, 1989), the mixed layer decreased from 162 to 20 m, and Zc decreased from 64 to 35 m. The depth of 1%Ed(0-,PAR) followed the trajectory of Zc, while Ed(488) and the depth of the bottom of the fluorescence maximum were about 10 m deeper, on average. These data support the criterion of the depth of “1%PAR” to describe the productive layer for more productive areas of the ocean. However, 1% of Ed(488) or the bottom of the fluorescence maximum could be used over a broader range of trophic conditions.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T19:48:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5a68c310ce034432bf53ba656586749c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-7745
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T19:48:39Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Marine Science
spelling doaj.art-5a68c310ce034432bf53ba656586749c2023-04-03T12:34:25ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Marine Science2296-77452023-04-011010.3389/fmars.2023.10523071052307Parameters for the depth of the ocean’s productive layerJohn F. Marra0John F. Marra1W. Sean Chamberlin2Carol A. Knudson3W. Joseph Rhea4Cheng Ho5Earth and Environmental Sciences, Brooklyn College of the City University of New York, Brooklyn, NY, United StatesEarth and Environmental Sciences, Graduate Center of the City University of New York, New York, NY, United StatesEarth Sciences, Fullerton College, Fullerton, CA, United StatesLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, NY, United StatesNaval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, United StatesLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, NY, United StatesHere we compare various parameters that are used to define the depth of the ocean’s productive layer, the euphotic zone, during the initiation of the spring phytoplankton bloom in the North Atlantic (47°N/20°W). These are (1) the compensation depth (Zc, where gross photosynthesis balances autotrophic respiration), (2) the depth horizon of 1% of surface photosynthetic active irradiance (Ed(0-,PAR), (3) depth horizon of 1% of surface Ed(488), and (4) the depth of the bottom of the fluorescence maximum. We also use two related parameters, the depth of the mixed layer and the ratio of integral gross production to integral respiration as a scaling factor for a proxy for the critical depth. Over the course of the observational period (25 April - 7 May, 1989), the mixed layer decreased from 162 to 20 m, and Zc decreased from 64 to 35 m. The depth of 1%Ed(0-,PAR) followed the trajectory of Zc, while Ed(488) and the depth of the bottom of the fluorescence maximum were about 10 m deeper, on average. These data support the criterion of the depth of “1%PAR” to describe the productive layer for more productive areas of the ocean. However, 1% of Ed(488) or the bottom of the fluorescence maximum could be used over a broader range of trophic conditions.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2023.1052307/fullradiometerproductivityrespirationeuphotic depthPARfluorescence
spellingShingle John F. Marra
John F. Marra
W. Sean Chamberlin
Carol A. Knudson
W. Joseph Rhea
Cheng Ho
Parameters for the depth of the ocean’s productive layer
Frontiers in Marine Science
radiometer
productivity
respiration
euphotic depth
PAR
fluorescence
title Parameters for the depth of the ocean’s productive layer
title_full Parameters for the depth of the ocean’s productive layer
title_fullStr Parameters for the depth of the ocean’s productive layer
title_full_unstemmed Parameters for the depth of the ocean’s productive layer
title_short Parameters for the depth of the ocean’s productive layer
title_sort parameters for the depth of the ocean s productive layer
topic radiometer
productivity
respiration
euphotic depth
PAR
fluorescence
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2023.1052307/full
work_keys_str_mv AT johnfmarra parametersforthedepthoftheoceansproductivelayer
AT johnfmarra parametersforthedepthoftheoceansproductivelayer
AT wseanchamberlin parametersforthedepthoftheoceansproductivelayer
AT carolaknudson parametersforthedepthoftheoceansproductivelayer
AT wjosephrhea parametersforthedepthoftheoceansproductivelayer
AT chengho parametersforthedepthoftheoceansproductivelayer