Concealed semantic and episodic autobiographical memory electrified

Electrophysiology-based concealed information tests (CIT) try to determine whether somebody possesses concealed information about a probe item by comparing event-related potentials (ERPs) between this item and comparison items (irrelevants). Although the broader field is sometimes referred to as mem...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Giorgio eGanis, Haline E. Schendan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00354/full
_version_ 1819106402398896128
author Giorgio eGanis
Giorgio eGanis
Giorgio eGanis
Haline E. Schendan
Haline E. Schendan
author_facet Giorgio eGanis
Giorgio eGanis
Giorgio eGanis
Haline E. Schendan
Haline E. Schendan
author_sort Giorgio eGanis
collection DOAJ
description Electrophysiology-based concealed information tests (CIT) try to determine whether somebody possesses concealed information about a probe item by comparing event-related potentials (ERPs) between this item and comparison items (irrelevants). Although the broader field is sometimes referred to as memory detection, little attention has been paid to the precise type of underlying memory involved. This study begins addressing this issue by examining the key distinction between semantic and episodic memory in the autobiographical domain within a CIT paradigm. This study also addressed the issue of whether multiple repetitions of the items over the course of the session habituate the brain responses. Participants were tested in a 3-stimulus CIT with semantic autobiographical probes (their own date of birth) and episodic autobiographical probes (a secret date learned just before the study). Results dissociated these two memory conditions on several ERP components. Semantic probes elicited a smaller frontal N2 than episodic probes, consistent with the idea that the frontal N2 decreases with greater pre-existing semantic knowledge about the item. Likewise, semantic probes elicited a smaller central N400 than episodic probes. Semantic probes also elicited a larger P3b than episodic probes because of their richer meaning. In contrast, episodic probes elicited a larger late positive component (LPC) than semantic probes, because of the recent episodic memory associated with them. All these ERPs showed a difference between probes and irrelevants in both memory conditions, except for the N400, which showed a difference only in the semantic condition. Finally, although repetition affected the ERPs, it did not reduce the difference between probes and irrelevants. Thus, the type of memory associated with a probe has both theoretical and practical importance for CIT research.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T02:37:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5a7087c815e54ae1bc13e96f3eca0611
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5161
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T02:37:34Z
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-5a7087c815e54ae1bc13e96f3eca06112022-12-21T18:41:43ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience1662-51612013-01-01610.3389/fnhum.2012.0035435625Concealed semantic and episodic autobiographical memory electrifiedGiorgio eGanis0Giorgio eGanis1Giorgio eGanis2Haline E. Schendan3Haline E. Schendan4Plymouth UniversityMassachusetts General HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolPlymouth UniversityMassachusetts General HospitalElectrophysiology-based concealed information tests (CIT) try to determine whether somebody possesses concealed information about a probe item by comparing event-related potentials (ERPs) between this item and comparison items (irrelevants). Although the broader field is sometimes referred to as memory detection, little attention has been paid to the precise type of underlying memory involved. This study begins addressing this issue by examining the key distinction between semantic and episodic memory in the autobiographical domain within a CIT paradigm. This study also addressed the issue of whether multiple repetitions of the items over the course of the session habituate the brain responses. Participants were tested in a 3-stimulus CIT with semantic autobiographical probes (their own date of birth) and episodic autobiographical probes (a secret date learned just before the study). Results dissociated these two memory conditions on several ERP components. Semantic probes elicited a smaller frontal N2 than episodic probes, consistent with the idea that the frontal N2 decreases with greater pre-existing semantic knowledge about the item. Likewise, semantic probes elicited a smaller central N400 than episodic probes. Semantic probes also elicited a larger P3b than episodic probes because of their richer meaning. In contrast, episodic probes elicited a larger late positive component (LPC) than semantic probes, because of the recent episodic memory associated with them. All these ERPs showed a difference between probes and irrelevants in both memory conditions, except for the N400, which showed a difference only in the semantic condition. Finally, although repetition affected the ERPs, it did not reduce the difference between probes and irrelevants. Thus, the type of memory associated with a probe has both theoretical and practical importance for CIT research.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00354/fulldeceptionepisodic memorySemantic memoryERPs (Event-Related Potentials)deception detectionConcealed knowlege
spellingShingle Giorgio eGanis
Giorgio eGanis
Giorgio eGanis
Haline E. Schendan
Haline E. Schendan
Concealed semantic and episodic autobiographical memory electrified
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
deception
episodic memory
Semantic memory
ERPs (Event-Related Potentials)
deception detection
Concealed knowlege
title Concealed semantic and episodic autobiographical memory electrified
title_full Concealed semantic and episodic autobiographical memory electrified
title_fullStr Concealed semantic and episodic autobiographical memory electrified
title_full_unstemmed Concealed semantic and episodic autobiographical memory electrified
title_short Concealed semantic and episodic autobiographical memory electrified
title_sort concealed semantic and episodic autobiographical memory electrified
topic deception
episodic memory
Semantic memory
ERPs (Event-Related Potentials)
deception detection
Concealed knowlege
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00354/full
work_keys_str_mv AT giorgioeganis concealedsemanticandepisodicautobiographicalmemoryelectrified
AT giorgioeganis concealedsemanticandepisodicautobiographicalmemoryelectrified
AT giorgioeganis concealedsemanticandepisodicautobiographicalmemoryelectrified
AT halineeschendan concealedsemanticandepisodicautobiographicalmemoryelectrified
AT halineeschendan concealedsemanticandepisodicautobiographicalmemoryelectrified