A comparison of the inflammatory and proteolytic effects of dung biomass and cigarette smoke exposure in the lung.

Biomass is the energy source for cooking and heating for billions of people worldwide. Despite their prevalent use and their potential impact on global health, the effects of these fuels on lung biology and function remain poorly understood.We exposed human small airway epithelial cells and C57BL/6...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Divya Mehra, Patrick M Geraghty, Andrew A Hardigan, Robert Foronjy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3527613?pdf=render
_version_ 1811288851823460352
author Divya Mehra
Patrick M Geraghty
Andrew A Hardigan
Robert Foronjy
author_facet Divya Mehra
Patrick M Geraghty
Andrew A Hardigan
Robert Foronjy
author_sort Divya Mehra
collection DOAJ
description Biomass is the energy source for cooking and heating for billions of people worldwide. Despite their prevalent use and their potential impact on global health, the effects of these fuels on lung biology and function remain poorly understood.We exposed human small airway epithelial cells and C57BL/6 mice to dung biomass smoke or cigarette smoke to compare how these exposures impacted lung signaling and inflammatory and proteolytic responses that have been linked with disease pathogenesis.The in vitro exposure and siRNA studies demonstrated that biomass and cigarette smoke activated ERK to up regulate IL-8 and MMP-1 expression in human airway epithelial cells. In contrast to cigarette smoke, biomass also activated p38 and JNK within these lung cells and lowered the expression of tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1). Similarly, in the lungs of mice, both biomass and cigarette smoke exposure increased macrophages, activated ERK and p38 and up regulated MMP-9 and MMP-12 expression. The main differences seen in the exposure studies was that mice exposed to biomass exhibited more perivascular inflammation and had higher G-CSF and GM-CSF lavage fluid levels than mice exposed identically to cigarette smoke.Biomass activates similar pathogenic processes seen in cigarette smoke exposure that are known to result in the disruption of lung structure. These findings provide biological evidence that public health interventions are needed to address the harm associated with the use of this fuel source.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T03:44:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5a711b8026a944578e37420bc22530b6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T03:44:34Z
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-5a711b8026a944578e37420bc22530b62022-12-22T03:04:03ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-01712e5288910.1371/journal.pone.0052889A comparison of the inflammatory and proteolytic effects of dung biomass and cigarette smoke exposure in the lung.Divya MehraPatrick M GeraghtyAndrew A HardiganRobert ForonjyBiomass is the energy source for cooking and heating for billions of people worldwide. Despite their prevalent use and their potential impact on global health, the effects of these fuels on lung biology and function remain poorly understood.We exposed human small airway epithelial cells and C57BL/6 mice to dung biomass smoke or cigarette smoke to compare how these exposures impacted lung signaling and inflammatory and proteolytic responses that have been linked with disease pathogenesis.The in vitro exposure and siRNA studies demonstrated that biomass and cigarette smoke activated ERK to up regulate IL-8 and MMP-1 expression in human airway epithelial cells. In contrast to cigarette smoke, biomass also activated p38 and JNK within these lung cells and lowered the expression of tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1). Similarly, in the lungs of mice, both biomass and cigarette smoke exposure increased macrophages, activated ERK and p38 and up regulated MMP-9 and MMP-12 expression. The main differences seen in the exposure studies was that mice exposed to biomass exhibited more perivascular inflammation and had higher G-CSF and GM-CSF lavage fluid levels than mice exposed identically to cigarette smoke.Biomass activates similar pathogenic processes seen in cigarette smoke exposure that are known to result in the disruption of lung structure. These findings provide biological evidence that public health interventions are needed to address the harm associated with the use of this fuel source.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3527613?pdf=render
spellingShingle Divya Mehra
Patrick M Geraghty
Andrew A Hardigan
Robert Foronjy
A comparison of the inflammatory and proteolytic effects of dung biomass and cigarette smoke exposure in the lung.
PLoS ONE
title A comparison of the inflammatory and proteolytic effects of dung biomass and cigarette smoke exposure in the lung.
title_full A comparison of the inflammatory and proteolytic effects of dung biomass and cigarette smoke exposure in the lung.
title_fullStr A comparison of the inflammatory and proteolytic effects of dung biomass and cigarette smoke exposure in the lung.
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of the inflammatory and proteolytic effects of dung biomass and cigarette smoke exposure in the lung.
title_short A comparison of the inflammatory and proteolytic effects of dung biomass and cigarette smoke exposure in the lung.
title_sort comparison of the inflammatory and proteolytic effects of dung biomass and cigarette smoke exposure in the lung
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3527613?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT divyamehra acomparisonoftheinflammatoryandproteolyticeffectsofdungbiomassandcigarettesmokeexposureinthelung
AT patrickmgeraghty acomparisonoftheinflammatoryandproteolyticeffectsofdungbiomassandcigarettesmokeexposureinthelung
AT andrewahardigan acomparisonoftheinflammatoryandproteolyticeffectsofdungbiomassandcigarettesmokeexposureinthelung
AT robertforonjy acomparisonoftheinflammatoryandproteolyticeffectsofdungbiomassandcigarettesmokeexposureinthelung
AT divyamehra comparisonoftheinflammatoryandproteolyticeffectsofdungbiomassandcigarettesmokeexposureinthelung
AT patrickmgeraghty comparisonoftheinflammatoryandproteolyticeffectsofdungbiomassandcigarettesmokeexposureinthelung
AT andrewahardigan comparisonoftheinflammatoryandproteolyticeffectsofdungbiomassandcigarettesmokeexposureinthelung
AT robertforonjy comparisonoftheinflammatoryandproteolyticeffectsofdungbiomassandcigarettesmokeexposureinthelung