Function Follows Form: Considerations on Hard Heritage Facing the Climate Emergency

In the discipline of architecture, there is an established familiarity with the 19th century’s Louis Sullivan’s pithy dictum “form follows function”. The expression has indeed directly and indirectly inspired many authors and movements, especially during the beginning of the 20th century, when objec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Maria Rita Pais
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-01-01
Series:Architecture
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8945/4/1/5
_version_ 1797242133704343552
author Maria Rita Pais
author_facet Maria Rita Pais
author_sort Maria Rita Pais
collection DOAJ
description In the discipline of architecture, there is an established familiarity with the 19th century’s Louis Sullivan’s pithy dictum “form follows function”. The expression has indeed directly and indirectly inspired many authors and movements, especially during the beginning of the 20th century, when objectivity showed its value in improving the progress of the industrial society. Nonetheless, the reception effects of such architecture with the primacy of function were responsible for decisive transformations in architectural form, human behaviour, social transformations and material and technological manoeuvres and gave rise to very rich developments related to form, history and inhabitants’ psychological engagements, among many others. So, what about the reception effects framed in the natural and inhabited environment? Could we make space for a sense of greater need, facing a climate emergency? The present paper brings the example of a bunker’s super-resistant heritage, as a paradigmatic sample of material resistance, that supports the idea that “Function (can) Follow the Form” when re-signifying hard architecture, as is the case with Plan Barron of Defence of Lisbon and Setubal, a recently declassified military heritage set of buildings. The study conducts a critical literature review as a qualitative method of research that groups factors into clusters to give evidence to some conceptual theoretical frameworks: “hardness”; “inheritance”; “<i>object trouvé</i>”; “affordance”; and “empathy”. These concepts become then the basis to frame a new paradigm: function follows form can be a pertinent approach when dealing with super-resistant structures in the present climate crisis. This inverse paragon, well explained, could work as a <i>motto</i> to architects for a new era of global climate action.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T18:34:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5a7516f8fdce4be1a03e876f1c396d71
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2673-8945
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T18:34:23Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Architecture
spelling doaj.art-5a7516f8fdce4be1a03e876f1c396d712024-03-27T13:20:25ZengMDPI AGArchitecture2673-89452024-01-0141467210.3390/architecture4010005Function Follows Form: Considerations on Hard Heritage Facing the Climate EmergencyMaria Rita Pais0Department of Architecture and Urbanism, Lusófona University, 1749-024 Lisbon, PortugalIn the discipline of architecture, there is an established familiarity with the 19th century’s Louis Sullivan’s pithy dictum “form follows function”. The expression has indeed directly and indirectly inspired many authors and movements, especially during the beginning of the 20th century, when objectivity showed its value in improving the progress of the industrial society. Nonetheless, the reception effects of such architecture with the primacy of function were responsible for decisive transformations in architectural form, human behaviour, social transformations and material and technological manoeuvres and gave rise to very rich developments related to form, history and inhabitants’ psychological engagements, among many others. So, what about the reception effects framed in the natural and inhabited environment? Could we make space for a sense of greater need, facing a climate emergency? The present paper brings the example of a bunker’s super-resistant heritage, as a paradigmatic sample of material resistance, that supports the idea that “Function (can) Follow the Form” when re-signifying hard architecture, as is the case with Plan Barron of Defence of Lisbon and Setubal, a recently declassified military heritage set of buildings. The study conducts a critical literature review as a qualitative method of research that groups factors into clusters to give evidence to some conceptual theoretical frameworks: “hardness”; “inheritance”; “<i>object trouvé</i>”; “affordance”; and “empathy”. These concepts become then the basis to frame a new paradigm: function follows form can be a pertinent approach when dealing with super-resistant structures in the present climate crisis. This inverse paragon, well explained, could work as a <i>motto</i> to architects for a new era of global climate action.https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8945/4/1/5climate crisismilitary architecturebunker architecturebuilt heritagesustainable built environment
spellingShingle Maria Rita Pais
Function Follows Form: Considerations on Hard Heritage Facing the Climate Emergency
Architecture
climate crisis
military architecture
bunker architecture
built heritage
sustainable built environment
title Function Follows Form: Considerations on Hard Heritage Facing the Climate Emergency
title_full Function Follows Form: Considerations on Hard Heritage Facing the Climate Emergency
title_fullStr Function Follows Form: Considerations on Hard Heritage Facing the Climate Emergency
title_full_unstemmed Function Follows Form: Considerations on Hard Heritage Facing the Climate Emergency
title_short Function Follows Form: Considerations on Hard Heritage Facing the Climate Emergency
title_sort function follows form considerations on hard heritage facing the climate emergency
topic climate crisis
military architecture
bunker architecture
built heritage
sustainable built environment
url https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8945/4/1/5
work_keys_str_mv AT mariaritapais functionfollowsformconsiderationsonhardheritagefacingtheclimateemergency