Human walking in the real world: Interactions between terrain type, gait parameters, and energy expenditure.

Humans often traverse real-world environments with a variety of surface irregularities and inconsistencies, which can disrupt steady gait and require additional effort. Such effects have, however, scarcely been demonstrated quantitatively, because few laboratory biomechanical measures apply outdoors...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel B Kowalsky, John R Rebula, Lauro V Ojeda, Peter G Adamczyk, Arthur D Kuo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228682
_version_ 1819012450604810240
author Daniel B Kowalsky
John R Rebula
Lauro V Ojeda
Peter G Adamczyk
Arthur D Kuo
author_facet Daniel B Kowalsky
John R Rebula
Lauro V Ojeda
Peter G Adamczyk
Arthur D Kuo
author_sort Daniel B Kowalsky
collection DOAJ
description Humans often traverse real-world environments with a variety of surface irregularities and inconsistencies, which can disrupt steady gait and require additional effort. Such effects have, however, scarcely been demonstrated quantitatively, because few laboratory biomechanical measures apply outdoors. Walking can nevertheless be quantified by other means. In particular, the foot's trajectory in space can be reconstructed from foot-mounted inertial measurement units (IMUs), to yield measures of stride and associated variabilities. But it remains unknown whether such measures are related to metabolic energy expenditure. We therefore quantified the effect of five different outdoor terrains on foot motion (from IMUs) and net metabolic rate (from oxygen consumption) in healthy adults (N = 10; walking at 1.25 m/s). Energy expenditure increased significantly (P < 0.05) in the order Sidewalk, Dirt, Gravel, Grass, and Woodchips, with Woodchips about 27% costlier than Sidewalk. Terrain type also affected measures, particularly stride variability and virtual foot clearance (swing foot's lowest height above consecutive footfalls). In combination, such measures can also roughly predict metabolic cost (adjusted R2 = 0.52, partial least squares regression), and even discriminate between terrain types (10% reclassification error). Body-worn sensors can characterize how uneven terrain affects gait, gait variability, and metabolic cost in the real world.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T01:44:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5a7ce61b8e4448949fd638b5a49e93e3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T01:44:15Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-5a7ce61b8e4448949fd638b5a49e93e32022-12-21T19:20:03ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01161e022868210.1371/journal.pone.0228682Human walking in the real world: Interactions between terrain type, gait parameters, and energy expenditure.Daniel B KowalskyJohn R RebulaLauro V OjedaPeter G AdamczykArthur D KuoHumans often traverse real-world environments with a variety of surface irregularities and inconsistencies, which can disrupt steady gait and require additional effort. Such effects have, however, scarcely been demonstrated quantitatively, because few laboratory biomechanical measures apply outdoors. Walking can nevertheless be quantified by other means. In particular, the foot's trajectory in space can be reconstructed from foot-mounted inertial measurement units (IMUs), to yield measures of stride and associated variabilities. But it remains unknown whether such measures are related to metabolic energy expenditure. We therefore quantified the effect of five different outdoor terrains on foot motion (from IMUs) and net metabolic rate (from oxygen consumption) in healthy adults (N = 10; walking at 1.25 m/s). Energy expenditure increased significantly (P < 0.05) in the order Sidewalk, Dirt, Gravel, Grass, and Woodchips, with Woodchips about 27% costlier than Sidewalk. Terrain type also affected measures, particularly stride variability and virtual foot clearance (swing foot's lowest height above consecutive footfalls). In combination, such measures can also roughly predict metabolic cost (adjusted R2 = 0.52, partial least squares regression), and even discriminate between terrain types (10% reclassification error). Body-worn sensors can characterize how uneven terrain affects gait, gait variability, and metabolic cost in the real world.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228682
spellingShingle Daniel B Kowalsky
John R Rebula
Lauro V Ojeda
Peter G Adamczyk
Arthur D Kuo
Human walking in the real world: Interactions between terrain type, gait parameters, and energy expenditure.
PLoS ONE
title Human walking in the real world: Interactions between terrain type, gait parameters, and energy expenditure.
title_full Human walking in the real world: Interactions between terrain type, gait parameters, and energy expenditure.
title_fullStr Human walking in the real world: Interactions between terrain type, gait parameters, and energy expenditure.
title_full_unstemmed Human walking in the real world: Interactions between terrain type, gait parameters, and energy expenditure.
title_short Human walking in the real world: Interactions between terrain type, gait parameters, and energy expenditure.
title_sort human walking in the real world interactions between terrain type gait parameters and energy expenditure
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228682
work_keys_str_mv AT danielbkowalsky humanwalkingintherealworldinteractionsbetweenterraintypegaitparametersandenergyexpenditure
AT johnrrebula humanwalkingintherealworldinteractionsbetweenterraintypegaitparametersandenergyexpenditure
AT laurovojeda humanwalkingintherealworldinteractionsbetweenterraintypegaitparametersandenergyexpenditure
AT petergadamczyk humanwalkingintherealworldinteractionsbetweenterraintypegaitparametersandenergyexpenditure
AT arthurdkuo humanwalkingintherealworldinteractionsbetweenterraintypegaitparametersandenergyexpenditure