Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Compared with Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol, Budesonide/Formoterol, and Tiotropium as Initial Maintenance Therapy in Patients with COPD Who Have High Costs and Comorbidities

Ravi Kalhan,1 David Slade,2 Riju Ray,2 Chad Moretz,3 Guillaume Germain,4 François Laliberté,4 Qin Shen,5 Mei Sheng Duh,6 Sean Dale MacKnight,4 Beth Hahn3 1Asthma and COPD Program, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kalhan R, Slade D, Ray R, Moretz C, Germain G, Laliberté F, Shen Q, Duh MS, MacKnight SD, Hahn B
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2021-04-01
Series:International Journal of COPD
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/umeclidiniumvilanterol-compared-with-fluticasone-propionatesalmeterol--peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-COPD
_version_ 1818675781076779008
author Kalhan R
Slade D
Ray R
Moretz C
Germain G
Laliberté F
Shen Q
Duh MS
MacKnight SD
Hahn B
author_facet Kalhan R
Slade D
Ray R
Moretz C
Germain G
Laliberté F
Shen Q
Duh MS
MacKnight SD
Hahn B
author_sort Kalhan R
collection DOAJ
description Ravi Kalhan,1 David Slade,2 Riju Ray,2 Chad Moretz,3 Guillaume Germain,4 François Laliberté,4 Qin Shen,5 Mei Sheng Duh,6 Sean Dale MacKnight,4 Beth Hahn3 1Asthma and COPD Program, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA; 2US Medical Affairs, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA; 3US Value Evidence and Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA; 4Groupe d’Analyse, Ltée, Montréal, QC, Canada; 5US Value Evidence and Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA; 6Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA, USACorrespondence: Beth HahnUS Value Evidence and Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline, 5 Moore Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709-3398, USATel +1 919-274-0660Email Beth.a.hahn@gsk.comBackground: Comorbidities in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are associated with increased medical costs and risk of exacerbations. This study compared COPD-related medical costs and exacerbations in high-cost, high-comorbidity patients with COPD receiving initial maintenance treatment (IMT) with umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI) versus fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/SAL), budesonide/formoterol (B/F), or tiotropium (TIO).Methods: This retrospective, matched cohort study identified patients from Optum’s de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart database who initiated UMEC/VI, FP/SAL, B/F, or TIO between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2018 (index date defined as date of the first fill). Eligibility criteria included age ≥ 40 years at index, ≥ 1 pre-index COPD diagnosis, no pre-index asthma diagnosis, 12 months of continuous insurance coverage pre-index, and high pre-index costs (≥ 80th percentile of IMT population) and comorbidities (Quan-Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 3). Propensity score matching was used to control for potential confounders. On-treatment COPD-related medical costs (primary endpoint) and exacerbations were evaluated.Results: Matched cohorts were well balanced on baseline characteristics (UMEC/VI vs FP/SAL: n=1194 each; UMEC/VI vs B/F: n=1441 each; UMEC/VI vs TIO: n=1277 each). Patients receiving UMEC/VI had significantly lower COPD-related medical costs versus FP/SAL (difference: $6587 per patient per year; P=0.048), and numerically lower costs versus B/F and TIO. Patients initiating UMEC/VI had significantly lower risk of COPD-related severe exacerbation versus FP/SAL (hazard ratio [95% CI]: 0.78 [0.62, 0.98]; P=0.032), B/F (0.77 [0.63, 0.95]; P=0.016), and TIO (0.79 [0.64, 0.98]; P=0.028). The rate of COPD-related severe exacerbations was significantly lower with UMEC/VI versus FP/SAL (rate ratio [95% CI]: 0.73 [0.59, 0.91]; P=0.008) and B/F (0.73 [0.59, 0.93]; P=0.012), and numerically lower versus TIO (0.83 [0.68, 1.04]; P=0.080).Conclusion: These findings suggest that high-cost, high-comorbidity patients with COPD receiving UMEC/VI compared with FP/SAL, B/F, and TIO as IMT may have lower medical costs and exacerbation risk.Keywords: COPD, LAMA/LABA, medical costs, comorbidities, severe exacerbations
first_indexed 2024-12-17T08:33:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5a8c0d9a253545d48c642c2cee9fe241
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1178-2005
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T08:33:02Z
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series International Journal of COPD
spelling doaj.art-5a8c0d9a253545d48c642c2cee9fe2412022-12-21T21:56:32ZengDove Medical PressInternational Journal of COPD1178-20052021-04-01Volume 161149116164200Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Compared with Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol, Budesonide/Formoterol, and Tiotropium as Initial Maintenance Therapy in Patients with COPD Who Have High Costs and ComorbiditiesKalhan RSlade DRay RMoretz CGermain GLaliberté FShen QDuh MSMacKnight SDHahn BRavi Kalhan,1 David Slade,2 Riju Ray,2 Chad Moretz,3 Guillaume Germain,4 François Laliberté,4 Qin Shen,5 Mei Sheng Duh,6 Sean Dale MacKnight,4 Beth Hahn3 1Asthma and COPD Program, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA; 2US Medical Affairs, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA; 3US Value Evidence and Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA; 4Groupe d’Analyse, Ltée, Montréal, QC, Canada; 5US Value Evidence and Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA; 6Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA, USACorrespondence: Beth HahnUS Value Evidence and Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline, 5 Moore Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709-3398, USATel +1 919-274-0660Email Beth.a.hahn@gsk.comBackground: Comorbidities in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are associated with increased medical costs and risk of exacerbations. This study compared COPD-related medical costs and exacerbations in high-cost, high-comorbidity patients with COPD receiving initial maintenance treatment (IMT) with umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI) versus fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/SAL), budesonide/formoterol (B/F), or tiotropium (TIO).Methods: This retrospective, matched cohort study identified patients from Optum’s de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart database who initiated UMEC/VI, FP/SAL, B/F, or TIO between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2018 (index date defined as date of the first fill). Eligibility criteria included age ≥ 40 years at index, ≥ 1 pre-index COPD diagnosis, no pre-index asthma diagnosis, 12 months of continuous insurance coverage pre-index, and high pre-index costs (≥ 80th percentile of IMT population) and comorbidities (Quan-Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 3). Propensity score matching was used to control for potential confounders. On-treatment COPD-related medical costs (primary endpoint) and exacerbations were evaluated.Results: Matched cohorts were well balanced on baseline characteristics (UMEC/VI vs FP/SAL: n=1194 each; UMEC/VI vs B/F: n=1441 each; UMEC/VI vs TIO: n=1277 each). Patients receiving UMEC/VI had significantly lower COPD-related medical costs versus FP/SAL (difference: $6587 per patient per year; P=0.048), and numerically lower costs versus B/F and TIO. Patients initiating UMEC/VI had significantly lower risk of COPD-related severe exacerbation versus FP/SAL (hazard ratio [95% CI]: 0.78 [0.62, 0.98]; P=0.032), B/F (0.77 [0.63, 0.95]; P=0.016), and TIO (0.79 [0.64, 0.98]; P=0.028). The rate of COPD-related severe exacerbations was significantly lower with UMEC/VI versus FP/SAL (rate ratio [95% CI]: 0.73 [0.59, 0.91]; P=0.008) and B/F (0.73 [0.59, 0.93]; P=0.012), and numerically lower versus TIO (0.83 [0.68, 1.04]; P=0.080).Conclusion: These findings suggest that high-cost, high-comorbidity patients with COPD receiving UMEC/VI compared with FP/SAL, B/F, and TIO as IMT may have lower medical costs and exacerbation risk.Keywords: COPD, LAMA/LABA, medical costs, comorbidities, severe exacerbationshttps://www.dovepress.com/umeclidiniumvilanterol-compared-with-fluticasone-propionatesalmeterol--peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-COPDcopdlama/labamedical costscomorbiditiessevere exacerbations
spellingShingle Kalhan R
Slade D
Ray R
Moretz C
Germain G
Laliberté F
Shen Q
Duh MS
MacKnight SD
Hahn B
Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Compared with Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol, Budesonide/Formoterol, and Tiotropium as Initial Maintenance Therapy in Patients with COPD Who Have High Costs and Comorbidities
International Journal of COPD
copd
lama/laba
medical costs
comorbidities
severe exacerbations
title Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Compared with Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol, Budesonide/Formoterol, and Tiotropium as Initial Maintenance Therapy in Patients with COPD Who Have High Costs and Comorbidities
title_full Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Compared with Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol, Budesonide/Formoterol, and Tiotropium as Initial Maintenance Therapy in Patients with COPD Who Have High Costs and Comorbidities
title_fullStr Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Compared with Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol, Budesonide/Formoterol, and Tiotropium as Initial Maintenance Therapy in Patients with COPD Who Have High Costs and Comorbidities
title_full_unstemmed Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Compared with Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol, Budesonide/Formoterol, and Tiotropium as Initial Maintenance Therapy in Patients with COPD Who Have High Costs and Comorbidities
title_short Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Compared with Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol, Budesonide/Formoterol, and Tiotropium as Initial Maintenance Therapy in Patients with COPD Who Have High Costs and Comorbidities
title_sort umeclidinium vilanterol compared with fluticasone propionate salmeterol budesonide formoterol and tiotropium as initial maintenance therapy in patients with copd who have high costs and comorbidities
topic copd
lama/laba
medical costs
comorbidities
severe exacerbations
url https://www.dovepress.com/umeclidiniumvilanterol-compared-with-fluticasone-propionatesalmeterol--peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-COPD
work_keys_str_mv AT kalhanr umeclidiniumvilanterolcomparedwithfluticasonepropionatesalmeterolbudesonideformoterolandtiotropiumasinitialmaintenancetherapyinpatientswithcopdwhohavehighcostsandcomorbidities
AT sladed umeclidiniumvilanterolcomparedwithfluticasonepropionatesalmeterolbudesonideformoterolandtiotropiumasinitialmaintenancetherapyinpatientswithcopdwhohavehighcostsandcomorbidities
AT rayr umeclidiniumvilanterolcomparedwithfluticasonepropionatesalmeterolbudesonideformoterolandtiotropiumasinitialmaintenancetherapyinpatientswithcopdwhohavehighcostsandcomorbidities
AT moretzc umeclidiniumvilanterolcomparedwithfluticasonepropionatesalmeterolbudesonideformoterolandtiotropiumasinitialmaintenancetherapyinpatientswithcopdwhohavehighcostsandcomorbidities
AT germaing umeclidiniumvilanterolcomparedwithfluticasonepropionatesalmeterolbudesonideformoterolandtiotropiumasinitialmaintenancetherapyinpatientswithcopdwhohavehighcostsandcomorbidities
AT lalibertef umeclidiniumvilanterolcomparedwithfluticasonepropionatesalmeterolbudesonideformoterolandtiotropiumasinitialmaintenancetherapyinpatientswithcopdwhohavehighcostsandcomorbidities
AT shenq umeclidiniumvilanterolcomparedwithfluticasonepropionatesalmeterolbudesonideformoterolandtiotropiumasinitialmaintenancetherapyinpatientswithcopdwhohavehighcostsandcomorbidities
AT duhms umeclidiniumvilanterolcomparedwithfluticasonepropionatesalmeterolbudesonideformoterolandtiotropiumasinitialmaintenancetherapyinpatientswithcopdwhohavehighcostsandcomorbidities
AT macknightsd umeclidiniumvilanterolcomparedwithfluticasonepropionatesalmeterolbudesonideformoterolandtiotropiumasinitialmaintenancetherapyinpatientswithcopdwhohavehighcostsandcomorbidities
AT hahnb umeclidiniumvilanterolcomparedwithfluticasonepropionatesalmeterolbudesonideformoterolandtiotropiumasinitialmaintenancetherapyinpatientswithcopdwhohavehighcostsandcomorbidities