Are male soccer players accumulating sufficient load across varying microcycle structures? Examining the load, wellness and training/match ratios of a professional team
Professional soccer involves varying numbers of training sessions and matches each week, which can influence load distribution. Understanding the exact distribution may allow appropriate load periodisation and planning for players. Thus, this study aimed to (i) compare accumulated load and wellne...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MRE Press
2023-09-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Men's Health |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://oss.jomh.org/files/article/20230928-96/pdf/JOMH2023031001.pdf |
| Summary: | Professional soccer involves varying numbers of training sessions and matches
each week, which can influence load distribution. Understanding the exact
distribution may allow appropriate load periodisation and planning for players.
Thus, this study aimed to (i) compare accumulated load and wellness between weeks
with different numbers of training sessions and (ii) compare training/match ratio
(TMr) of external and internal load between weeks with different numbers of
training sessions. Ten players with a minimum of 45 minutes of weekly match-play
were analysed over 16 weeks. The microcycle structures consisted of three (3dW),
four (4dW), five (5dW) and six (6dW) training sessions plus match-day per week.
The following measures were used for analysis: duration, fatigue, quality of
sleep, muscle soreness, stress, mood, rating of perceived exertion (RPE),
session-RPE (s-RPE), high-speed running distance (HSR), sprint distance (SPD),
number of accelerations (ACC) and decelerations (DEC). Accumulated wellness/load
were calculated by adding all training and match sessions, while TMr was
calculated by dividing accumulated load by match data. The main results showed
that accumulated wellness and load were significantly different, with moderate to
very large effect sizes, except regarding mood, duration, s-RPE, SPD during 5dW
vs. 6dW and s-RPE, HSR, SPD, ACC and DEC during 3dW vs. 4dW
(all p > 0.05). Moreover, 6dW was significantly higher than 4dW
regarding TMr of duration (p < 0.05, moderate effect size), RPE, HSR
and SPD (all p < 0.05 with very large effect sizes) and for 3dW of HSR
and ACC (p < 0.05 with very large effect sizes). This study showed
that 5dW and 6dW had higher training measures than 3dW or 4dW. Additionally,
higher wellness was presented in the microcycles with higher training
frequencies. These findings suggest that physical load and wellness were not
adjusted according to the number of training sessions within a microcycle. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1875-6867 1875-6859 |