Comparative Analysis of Antithrombotic Therapy in In-Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Aim. To study the frequency of prescribing antithrombotic agents in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) who were hospitalized in the cardiology department of a multidisciplinary hospital.Material and methods. A retrospective one-time study of medical records of 765 patients with non-...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: V. I. Petrov, O. V. Shatalova, A. S. Gerasimenko, V. S. Gorbatenko
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Столичная издательская компания 2019-03-01
Series:Рациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.rpcardio.online/jour/article/view/1858
_version_ 1797232152005312512
author V. I. Petrov
O. V. Shatalova
A. S. Gerasimenko
V. S. Gorbatenko
author_facet V. I. Petrov
O. V. Shatalova
A. S. Gerasimenko
V. S. Gorbatenko
author_sort V. I. Petrov
collection DOAJ
description Aim. To study the frequency of prescribing antithrombotic agents in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) who were hospitalized in the cardiology department of a multidisciplinary hospital.Material and methods. A retrospective one-time study of medical records of 765 patients with non-valvular AF treated in the cardiology department of a multidisciplinary hospital in 2012 and 2016 was performed.Results. All patients were stratified in three groups depending on the CHA2DS2-VASc score. The frequency of prescribing antithrombotic agents was evaluated in each group. A low risk of thromboembolic complications was found in 1% (n=3) of patients in 2012 and 0.6% (n=3) in 2016. All these patients received antithrombotic agents. CHA2DS2-VASc=1 was found in 6% (n=15) of patients with AF in 2012 and in 3.4% (n=17) in 2016. A significant number of patients in this group received anticoagulant therapy with vitamin K antagonists (warfarin) or with direct oral anticoagulants. A high risk of thromboembolic complications (CHA2DS2-VASc≥2) was found in 93% of patient (n=245) in 2012 and in 96% (n=482) in 2016. Anticoagulant therapy was prescribed in 70.2% (n=172) patients with high risk in 2012 and 80% (n=387) in 2016. However, some patients with high risk of thromboembolic complications did not have the necessary therapy.Conclusion. Positive changes in the structure and frequency of prescribing anticoagulant drugs in patients with AF and a high risk of thromboembolic complications were found during the years studied.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T14:01:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5aacaab3d4e542849d631bb1729a688c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1819-6446
2225-3653
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T15:55:43Z
publishDate 2019-03-01
publisher Столичная издательская компания
record_format Article
series Рациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии
spelling doaj.art-5aacaab3d4e542849d631bb1729a688c2024-04-01T07:43:37ZengСтоличная издательская компанияРациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии1819-64462225-36532019-03-01151495310.20996/1819-6446-2019-15-1-49-531573Comparative Analysis of Antithrombotic Therapy in In-Patients with Atrial FibrillationV. I. Petrov0O. V. Shatalova1A. S. Gerasimenko2V. S. Gorbatenko3Volgograd State Medical UniversityVolgograd State Medical UniversityVolgograd State Medical UniversityVolgograd State Medical UniversityAim. To study the frequency of prescribing antithrombotic agents in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) who were hospitalized in the cardiology department of a multidisciplinary hospital.Material and methods. A retrospective one-time study of medical records of 765 patients with non-valvular AF treated in the cardiology department of a multidisciplinary hospital in 2012 and 2016 was performed.Results. All patients were stratified in three groups depending on the CHA2DS2-VASc score. The frequency of prescribing antithrombotic agents was evaluated in each group. A low risk of thromboembolic complications was found in 1% (n=3) of patients in 2012 and 0.6% (n=3) in 2016. All these patients received antithrombotic agents. CHA2DS2-VASc=1 was found in 6% (n=15) of patients with AF in 2012 and in 3.4% (n=17) in 2016. A significant number of patients in this group received anticoagulant therapy with vitamin K antagonists (warfarin) or with direct oral anticoagulants. A high risk of thromboembolic complications (CHA2DS2-VASc≥2) was found in 93% of patient (n=245) in 2012 and in 96% (n=482) in 2016. Anticoagulant therapy was prescribed in 70.2% (n=172) patients with high risk in 2012 and 80% (n=387) in 2016. However, some patients with high risk of thromboembolic complications did not have the necessary therapy.Conclusion. Positive changes in the structure and frequency of prescribing anticoagulant drugs in patients with AF and a high risk of thromboembolic complications were found during the years studied.https://www.rpcardio.online/jour/article/view/1858atrial fibrillationthromboembolic complicationspharmacoepidemiologic studyantithrombotic therapy
spellingShingle V. I. Petrov
O. V. Shatalova
A. S. Gerasimenko
V. S. Gorbatenko
Comparative Analysis of Antithrombotic Therapy in In-Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
Рациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии
atrial fibrillation
thromboembolic complications
pharmacoepidemiologic study
antithrombotic therapy
title Comparative Analysis of Antithrombotic Therapy in In-Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
title_full Comparative Analysis of Antithrombotic Therapy in In-Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Antithrombotic Therapy in In-Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Antithrombotic Therapy in In-Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
title_short Comparative Analysis of Antithrombotic Therapy in In-Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
title_sort comparative analysis of antithrombotic therapy in in patients with atrial fibrillation
topic atrial fibrillation
thromboembolic complications
pharmacoepidemiologic study
antithrombotic therapy
url https://www.rpcardio.online/jour/article/view/1858
work_keys_str_mv AT vipetrov comparativeanalysisofantithrombotictherapyininpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT ovshatalova comparativeanalysisofantithrombotictherapyininpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT asgerasimenko comparativeanalysisofantithrombotictherapyininpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT vsgorbatenko comparativeanalysisofantithrombotictherapyininpatientswithatrialfibrillation