Phantom Study on the Robustness of MR Radiomics Features: Comparing the Applicability of 3D Printed and Biological Phantoms

The objectives of our study were to (a) evaluate the feasibility of using 3D printed phantoms in magnetic resonance imaging (MR) in assessing the robustness and repeatability of radiomic parameters and (b) to compare the results obtained from the 3D printed phantoms to metrics obtained in biological...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gergő Veres, János Kiss, Norman Félix Vas, Piroska Kallos-Balogh, Nóra Beatrix Máthé, Martin Lyngby Lassen, Ervin Berényi, László Balkay
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-09-01
Series:Diagnostics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/12/9/2196
_version_ 1797489395781074944
author Gergő Veres
János Kiss
Norman Félix Vas
Piroska Kallos-Balogh
Nóra Beatrix Máthé
Martin Lyngby Lassen
Ervin Berényi
László Balkay
author_facet Gergő Veres
János Kiss
Norman Félix Vas
Piroska Kallos-Balogh
Nóra Beatrix Máthé
Martin Lyngby Lassen
Ervin Berényi
László Balkay
author_sort Gergő Veres
collection DOAJ
description The objectives of our study were to (a) evaluate the feasibility of using 3D printed phantoms in magnetic resonance imaging (MR) in assessing the robustness and repeatability of radiomic parameters and (b) to compare the results obtained from the 3D printed phantoms to metrics obtained in biological phantoms. To this end, three different 3D phantoms were printed: a Hilbert cube (5 × 5 × 5 cm<sup>3</sup>) and two cubic quick response (QR) code phantoms (a large phantom (large QR) (5 × 5 × 4 cm<sup>3</sup>) and a small phantom (small QR) (4 × 4 × 3 cm<sup>3</sup>)). All 3D printed and biological phantoms (kiwis, tomatoes, and onions) were scanned thrice on clinical 1.5 T and 3 T MR with 1 mm and 2 mm isotropic resolution. Subsequent analyses included analyses of several radiomics indices (RI), their repeatability and reliability were calculated using the coefficient of variation (CV), the relative percentage difference (RPD), and the interclass coefficient (ICC) parameters. Additionally, the readability of QR codes obtained from the MR images was examined with several mobile phones and algorithms. The best repeatability (CV ≤ 10%) is reported for the acquisition protocols with the highest spatial resolution. In general, the repeatability and reliability of RI were better in data obtained at 1.5 T (CV = 1.9) than at 3 T (CV = 2.11). Furthermore, we report good agreements between results obtained for the 3D phantoms and biological phantoms. Finally, analyses of the read-out rate of the QR code revealed better texture analyses for images with a spatial resolution of 1 mm than 2 mm. In conclusion, 3D printing techniques offer a unique solution to create textures for analyzing the reliability of radiomic data from MR scans.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T00:16:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5ade38418f0e4d789ffb13ea13e71028
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4418
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T00:16:56Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Diagnostics
spelling doaj.art-5ade38418f0e4d789ffb13ea13e710282023-11-23T15:50:18ZengMDPI AGDiagnostics2075-44182022-09-01129219610.3390/diagnostics12092196Phantom Study on the Robustness of MR Radiomics Features: Comparing the Applicability of 3D Printed and Biological PhantomsGergő Veres0János Kiss1Norman Félix Vas2Piroska Kallos-Balogh3Nóra Beatrix Máthé4Martin Lyngby Lassen5Ervin Berényi6László Balkay7Division of Radiology and Imaging Science, Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, HungaryDivision of Radiology and Imaging Science, Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, HungaryDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Translational Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, HungaryDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Translational Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, HungaryDivision of Radiology and Imaging Science, Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, HungaryDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Section 4011, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, 1165 Copenhagen, DenmarkDivision of Radiology and Imaging Science, Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, HungaryDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Translational Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, HungaryThe objectives of our study were to (a) evaluate the feasibility of using 3D printed phantoms in magnetic resonance imaging (MR) in assessing the robustness and repeatability of radiomic parameters and (b) to compare the results obtained from the 3D printed phantoms to metrics obtained in biological phantoms. To this end, three different 3D phantoms were printed: a Hilbert cube (5 × 5 × 5 cm<sup>3</sup>) and two cubic quick response (QR) code phantoms (a large phantom (large QR) (5 × 5 × 4 cm<sup>3</sup>) and a small phantom (small QR) (4 × 4 × 3 cm<sup>3</sup>)). All 3D printed and biological phantoms (kiwis, tomatoes, and onions) were scanned thrice on clinical 1.5 T and 3 T MR with 1 mm and 2 mm isotropic resolution. Subsequent analyses included analyses of several radiomics indices (RI), their repeatability and reliability were calculated using the coefficient of variation (CV), the relative percentage difference (RPD), and the interclass coefficient (ICC) parameters. Additionally, the readability of QR codes obtained from the MR images was examined with several mobile phones and algorithms. The best repeatability (CV ≤ 10%) is reported for the acquisition protocols with the highest spatial resolution. In general, the repeatability and reliability of RI were better in data obtained at 1.5 T (CV = 1.9) than at 3 T (CV = 2.11). Furthermore, we report good agreements between results obtained for the 3D phantoms and biological phantoms. Finally, analyses of the read-out rate of the QR code revealed better texture analyses for images with a spatial resolution of 1 mm than 2 mm. In conclusion, 3D printing techniques offer a unique solution to create textures for analyzing the reliability of radiomic data from MR scans.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/12/9/2196image processingtexture analysismagnetic resonance imagingphantom studyradiomics3D printing
spellingShingle Gergő Veres
János Kiss
Norman Félix Vas
Piroska Kallos-Balogh
Nóra Beatrix Máthé
Martin Lyngby Lassen
Ervin Berényi
László Balkay
Phantom Study on the Robustness of MR Radiomics Features: Comparing the Applicability of 3D Printed and Biological Phantoms
Diagnostics
image processing
texture analysis
magnetic resonance imaging
phantom study
radiomics
3D printing
title Phantom Study on the Robustness of MR Radiomics Features: Comparing the Applicability of 3D Printed and Biological Phantoms
title_full Phantom Study on the Robustness of MR Radiomics Features: Comparing the Applicability of 3D Printed and Biological Phantoms
title_fullStr Phantom Study on the Robustness of MR Radiomics Features: Comparing the Applicability of 3D Printed and Biological Phantoms
title_full_unstemmed Phantom Study on the Robustness of MR Radiomics Features: Comparing the Applicability of 3D Printed and Biological Phantoms
title_short Phantom Study on the Robustness of MR Radiomics Features: Comparing the Applicability of 3D Printed and Biological Phantoms
title_sort phantom study on the robustness of mr radiomics features comparing the applicability of 3d printed and biological phantoms
topic image processing
texture analysis
magnetic resonance imaging
phantom study
radiomics
3D printing
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/12/9/2196
work_keys_str_mv AT gergoveres phantomstudyontherobustnessofmrradiomicsfeaturescomparingtheapplicabilityof3dprintedandbiologicalphantoms
AT janoskiss phantomstudyontherobustnessofmrradiomicsfeaturescomparingtheapplicabilityof3dprintedandbiologicalphantoms
AT normanfelixvas phantomstudyontherobustnessofmrradiomicsfeaturescomparingtheapplicabilityof3dprintedandbiologicalphantoms
AT piroskakallosbalogh phantomstudyontherobustnessofmrradiomicsfeaturescomparingtheapplicabilityof3dprintedandbiologicalphantoms
AT norabeatrixmathe phantomstudyontherobustnessofmrradiomicsfeaturescomparingtheapplicabilityof3dprintedandbiologicalphantoms
AT martinlyngbylassen phantomstudyontherobustnessofmrradiomicsfeaturescomparingtheapplicabilityof3dprintedandbiologicalphantoms
AT ervinberenyi phantomstudyontherobustnessofmrradiomicsfeaturescomparingtheapplicabilityof3dprintedandbiologicalphantoms
AT laszlobalkay phantomstudyontherobustnessofmrradiomicsfeaturescomparingtheapplicabilityof3dprintedandbiologicalphantoms