Venous thromboembolism risk stratification for patients with lower limb trauma and cast or brace immobilization.

<h4>Background</h4>Thromboprophylaxis for patients with non-surgical isolated lower-limb trauma requiring immobilization is a matter of debate. Our aim was to develop and validate a clinical risk- stratification model based on Trauma, Immobilization and Patients' characteristics (th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D Douillet, B Nemeth, A Penaloza, G Le Gal, T Moumneh, S C Cannegieter, P M Roy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217748
_version_ 1819029056681672704
author D Douillet
B Nemeth
A Penaloza
G Le Gal
T Moumneh
S C Cannegieter
P M Roy
author_facet D Douillet
B Nemeth
A Penaloza
G Le Gal
T Moumneh
S C Cannegieter
P M Roy
author_sort D Douillet
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>Thromboprophylaxis for patients with non-surgical isolated lower-limb trauma requiring immobilization is a matter of debate. Our aim was to develop and validate a clinical risk- stratification model based on Trauma, Immobilization and Patients' characteristics (the TIP score).<h4>Methods</h4>The TIP score criteria and the cut-off were selected by a consensus of international experts (n = 27) using the Delphi method. Retrospective validation was performed in a population-based case-control study (MEGA study). The potential score's impact in anticoagulant treatment was assessed in a prospective single-center observational cohort study.<h4>Findings</h4>After four successive rounds, 30 items constituting the TIP score were selected: thirteen items for trauma, three for immobilization and 14 for patient characteristics were selected, each rated on a scale of 1 to 3. In the validation database, the TIP score had an AUC of 0·77 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.85). Using the cut-off proposed by the experts (≥5) and assuming a prevalence of 1·8%, the TIP scores had a sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive values of 89·9%, 30·7% and 99·4% respectively. In the prospective cohort, 84·2% (165/196) of all the patients concerned who presented at the emergency department had a low VTE risk not requiring thromboprophylaxis according to their TIP scores. The 3-month rate of symptomatic VTE was 1/196 [95% CI 0.1-2.8] this patient was in the sub-group TIP score ≥5.<h4>Conclusion</h4>For patients with non-surgical lower-limb trauma and orthopedic immobilization, the TIP score allows an individual VTE risk-assessment and shows promising results in guiding thromboprophylaxis.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T06:08:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5ae1e0d648874aa387c24228fbb47ef2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T06:08:12Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-5ae1e0d648874aa387c24228fbb47ef22022-12-21T19:13:36ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01146e021774810.1371/journal.pone.0217748Venous thromboembolism risk stratification for patients with lower limb trauma and cast or brace immobilization.D DouilletB NemethA PenalozaG Le GalT MoumnehS C CannegieterP M Roy<h4>Background</h4>Thromboprophylaxis for patients with non-surgical isolated lower-limb trauma requiring immobilization is a matter of debate. Our aim was to develop and validate a clinical risk- stratification model based on Trauma, Immobilization and Patients' characteristics (the TIP score).<h4>Methods</h4>The TIP score criteria and the cut-off were selected by a consensus of international experts (n = 27) using the Delphi method. Retrospective validation was performed in a population-based case-control study (MEGA study). The potential score's impact in anticoagulant treatment was assessed in a prospective single-center observational cohort study.<h4>Findings</h4>After four successive rounds, 30 items constituting the TIP score were selected: thirteen items for trauma, three for immobilization and 14 for patient characteristics were selected, each rated on a scale of 1 to 3. In the validation database, the TIP score had an AUC of 0·77 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.85). Using the cut-off proposed by the experts (≥5) and assuming a prevalence of 1·8%, the TIP scores had a sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive values of 89·9%, 30·7% and 99·4% respectively. In the prospective cohort, 84·2% (165/196) of all the patients concerned who presented at the emergency department had a low VTE risk not requiring thromboprophylaxis according to their TIP scores. The 3-month rate of symptomatic VTE was 1/196 [95% CI 0.1-2.8] this patient was in the sub-group TIP score ≥5.<h4>Conclusion</h4>For patients with non-surgical lower-limb trauma and orthopedic immobilization, the TIP score allows an individual VTE risk-assessment and shows promising results in guiding thromboprophylaxis.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217748
spellingShingle D Douillet
B Nemeth
A Penaloza
G Le Gal
T Moumneh
S C Cannegieter
P M Roy
Venous thromboembolism risk stratification for patients with lower limb trauma and cast or brace immobilization.
PLoS ONE
title Venous thromboembolism risk stratification for patients with lower limb trauma and cast or brace immobilization.
title_full Venous thromboembolism risk stratification for patients with lower limb trauma and cast or brace immobilization.
title_fullStr Venous thromboembolism risk stratification for patients with lower limb trauma and cast or brace immobilization.
title_full_unstemmed Venous thromboembolism risk stratification for patients with lower limb trauma and cast or brace immobilization.
title_short Venous thromboembolism risk stratification for patients with lower limb trauma and cast or brace immobilization.
title_sort venous thromboembolism risk stratification for patients with lower limb trauma and cast or brace immobilization
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217748
work_keys_str_mv AT ddouillet venousthromboembolismriskstratificationforpatientswithlowerlimbtraumaandcastorbraceimmobilization
AT bnemeth venousthromboembolismriskstratificationforpatientswithlowerlimbtraumaandcastorbraceimmobilization
AT apenaloza venousthromboembolismriskstratificationforpatientswithlowerlimbtraumaandcastorbraceimmobilization
AT glegal venousthromboembolismriskstratificationforpatientswithlowerlimbtraumaandcastorbraceimmobilization
AT tmoumneh venousthromboembolismriskstratificationforpatientswithlowerlimbtraumaandcastorbraceimmobilization
AT sccannegieter venousthromboembolismriskstratificationforpatientswithlowerlimbtraumaandcastorbraceimmobilization
AT pmroy venousthromboembolismriskstratificationforpatientswithlowerlimbtraumaandcastorbraceimmobilization