The ultrasound‐guided attenuation parameter is useful in quantification of hepatic steatosis in non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease

Abstract Aim To determine the utility of the ultrasound‐guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) for quantifying hepatic steatosis in non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Methods Subjects were 84 patients with NAFLD (53 men, 31 women; mean age 54 [20–81] years) who underwent liver biopsy and ultras...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yu Ogino, Noritaka Wakui, Hidenari Nagai, Yoshinori Igarashi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-08-01
Series:JGH Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12615
_version_ 1819130501564203008
author Yu Ogino
Noritaka Wakui
Hidenari Nagai
Yoshinori Igarashi
author_facet Yu Ogino
Noritaka Wakui
Hidenari Nagai
Yoshinori Igarashi
author_sort Yu Ogino
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Aim To determine the utility of the ultrasound‐guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) for quantifying hepatic steatosis in non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Methods Subjects were 84 patients with NAFLD (53 men, 31 women; mean age 54 [20–81] years) who underwent liver biopsy and ultrasonography using a GE LOGIQ E9 system and C1‐6 probe at our hospital between 2017 and 2020. B‐Mode imaging of segment V in the liver was acquired and echo attenuation was assessed using UGAP. Steatosis score (S0: <5%; S1: 5%–33%; S2: 34%–66%; S3: ≥67%) from liver specimens was compared with the attenuation coefficient (AC; dB/cm/MHz) using UGAP. Results Steatosis score was S0 for 9 patients, S1 for 40, S2 for 21, and S3 for 14. AC by steatosis score was 0.52 ± 0.07, 0.63 ± 0.07, 0.74 ± 0.06, and 0.78 ± 0.06 dB/cm/MHz for S0, S1, S2, and S3, respectively. AC by UGAP differed significantly between S0 and S1, S0 and S2, S0 and S3, S1 and S2, and S1 and S3 (all P < 0.01), demonstrating a significant increase with steatosis score. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed good diagnostic performance of UGAP for patients with steatosis score ≥1, ≥2, and ≥3 (AUROC = 0.94, 0.95, and 0.88, respectively). Liver fat content (%) from liver specimens and AC (r = 0.81, P < 0.01) showed a significant positive correlation. Conclusion UGAP is useful for quantifying hepatic steatosis in patients with NAFLD.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T09:00:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5aea2f6ff19f4b499c7f09de2dfb608b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2397-9070
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T09:00:37Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series JGH Open
spelling doaj.art-5aea2f6ff19f4b499c7f09de2dfb608b2022-12-21T18:31:44ZengWileyJGH Open2397-90702021-08-015894795210.1002/jgh3.12615The ultrasound‐guided attenuation parameter is useful in quantification of hepatic steatosis in non‐alcoholic fatty liver diseaseYu Ogino0Noritaka Wakui1Hidenari Nagai2Yoshinori Igarashi3Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine (Omori) School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Toho University Tokyo JapanDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine (Omori) School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Toho University Tokyo JapanDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine (Omori) School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Toho University Tokyo JapanDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine (Omori) School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Toho University Tokyo JapanAbstract Aim To determine the utility of the ultrasound‐guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) for quantifying hepatic steatosis in non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Methods Subjects were 84 patients with NAFLD (53 men, 31 women; mean age 54 [20–81] years) who underwent liver biopsy and ultrasonography using a GE LOGIQ E9 system and C1‐6 probe at our hospital between 2017 and 2020. B‐Mode imaging of segment V in the liver was acquired and echo attenuation was assessed using UGAP. Steatosis score (S0: <5%; S1: 5%–33%; S2: 34%–66%; S3: ≥67%) from liver specimens was compared with the attenuation coefficient (AC; dB/cm/MHz) using UGAP. Results Steatosis score was S0 for 9 patients, S1 for 40, S2 for 21, and S3 for 14. AC by steatosis score was 0.52 ± 0.07, 0.63 ± 0.07, 0.74 ± 0.06, and 0.78 ± 0.06 dB/cm/MHz for S0, S1, S2, and S3, respectively. AC by UGAP differed significantly between S0 and S1, S0 and S2, S0 and S3, S1 and S2, and S1 and S3 (all P < 0.01), demonstrating a significant increase with steatosis score. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed good diagnostic performance of UGAP for patients with steatosis score ≥1, ≥2, and ≥3 (AUROC = 0.94, 0.95, and 0.88, respectively). Liver fat content (%) from liver specimens and AC (r = 0.81, P < 0.01) showed a significant positive correlation. Conclusion UGAP is useful for quantifying hepatic steatosis in patients with NAFLD.https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12615attenuation imaginghepatic steatosisnon‐alcoholic fatty liver diseaseultrasonography
spellingShingle Yu Ogino
Noritaka Wakui
Hidenari Nagai
Yoshinori Igarashi
The ultrasound‐guided attenuation parameter is useful in quantification of hepatic steatosis in non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease
JGH Open
attenuation imaging
hepatic steatosis
non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease
ultrasonography
title The ultrasound‐guided attenuation parameter is useful in quantification of hepatic steatosis in non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease
title_full The ultrasound‐guided attenuation parameter is useful in quantification of hepatic steatosis in non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease
title_fullStr The ultrasound‐guided attenuation parameter is useful in quantification of hepatic steatosis in non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease
title_full_unstemmed The ultrasound‐guided attenuation parameter is useful in quantification of hepatic steatosis in non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease
title_short The ultrasound‐guided attenuation parameter is useful in quantification of hepatic steatosis in non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease
title_sort ultrasound guided attenuation parameter is useful in quantification of hepatic steatosis in non alcoholic fatty liver disease
topic attenuation imaging
hepatic steatosis
non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease
ultrasonography
url https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12615
work_keys_str_mv AT yuogino theultrasoundguidedattenuationparameterisusefulinquantificationofhepaticsteatosisinnonalcoholicfattyliverdisease
AT noritakawakui theultrasoundguidedattenuationparameterisusefulinquantificationofhepaticsteatosisinnonalcoholicfattyliverdisease
AT hidenarinagai theultrasoundguidedattenuationparameterisusefulinquantificationofhepaticsteatosisinnonalcoholicfattyliverdisease
AT yoshinoriigarashi theultrasoundguidedattenuationparameterisusefulinquantificationofhepaticsteatosisinnonalcoholicfattyliverdisease
AT yuogino ultrasoundguidedattenuationparameterisusefulinquantificationofhepaticsteatosisinnonalcoholicfattyliverdisease
AT noritakawakui ultrasoundguidedattenuationparameterisusefulinquantificationofhepaticsteatosisinnonalcoholicfattyliverdisease
AT hidenarinagai ultrasoundguidedattenuationparameterisusefulinquantificationofhepaticsteatosisinnonalcoholicfattyliverdisease
AT yoshinoriigarashi ultrasoundguidedattenuationparameterisusefulinquantificationofhepaticsteatosisinnonalcoholicfattyliverdisease