Frá skiptisögn til ósamhverfrar aukafallssagnar. Um 'líka' í fornu máli

In Modern Icelandic the verb líka ‘like’ occurs with a subject in the dative case and an object in the nominative case. It has been argued that this was also the case in Old Icelandic. In this paper we argue that in contrast to Modern Icelandic, the nominative argument of líka could also constitute...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Einar Freyr Sigurðsson, Heimir van der Feest Viðarsson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Árni Magnússon Institute for Icelandic Studies 2020-06-01
Series:Orð og Tunga
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ordogtunga.arnastofnun.is/index.php/ord-og-tunga/article/view/66
_version_ 1819066761545252864
author Einar Freyr Sigurðsson
Heimir van der Feest Viðarsson
author_facet Einar Freyr Sigurðsson
Heimir van der Feest Viðarsson
author_sort Einar Freyr Sigurðsson
collection DOAJ
description In Modern Icelandic the verb líka ‘like’ occurs with a subject in the dative case and an object in the nominative case. It has been argued that this was also the case in Old Icelandic. In this paper we argue that in contrast to Modern Icelandic, the nominative argument of líka could also constitute the subject during the Old Icelandic period and the dative argument the object. More specifically, we maintain that the verb líka was an alternating (or symmetric) verb where the nominative and the dative argument could raise to the subject position, whereas in Modern Icelandic only the dative is able to raise to the subject position. In other words, we argue that a change in the argument structure of the verb has taken place such that líka has changed from being an alternating (symmetric) verb to an asymmetric oblique subject verb. The main argument that is used to substantiate this claim comes from control infinitives in Old Icelandic, taking on the form in (i): (i) girntiz meirr at líka einum guði en mönnum desired.mid more to PRO.nom like.inf alone.dat god.dat than men.dat ‘(He) desired more to please God alone than men.’ (Æv 150.15) Based on a generative analysis of syntactic structure, we present evidence that reveals that the dative argument functions syntactically as the object, in addition to discussing other potential evidence based on word order. When the nominative argument is the subject, the meaning of 'líka' is sometimes closer to that of English 'please' than 'like'. We also discuss how this might be accounted for.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T16:07:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5aed21ab4eda4acfbb0137d203c1dd28
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1022-4610
2547-7218
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T16:07:30Z
publishDate 2020-06-01
publisher Árni Magnússon Institute for Icelandic Studies
record_format Article
series Orð og Tunga
spelling doaj.art-5aed21ab4eda4acfbb0137d203c1dd282022-12-21T18:57:51ZengÁrni Magnússon Institute for Icelandic StudiesOrð og Tunga1022-46102547-72182020-06-01223968https://doi.org/10.33112/ordogtunga.22.4Frá skiptisögn til ósamhverfrar aukafallssagnar. Um 'líka' í fornu máliEinar Freyr Sigurðsson0Heimir van der Feest Viðarsson1Árni Magnússon Institute for Icelandic StudiesUniversiteit GentIn Modern Icelandic the verb líka ‘like’ occurs with a subject in the dative case and an object in the nominative case. It has been argued that this was also the case in Old Icelandic. In this paper we argue that in contrast to Modern Icelandic, the nominative argument of líka could also constitute the subject during the Old Icelandic period and the dative argument the object. More specifically, we maintain that the verb líka was an alternating (or symmetric) verb where the nominative and the dative argument could raise to the subject position, whereas in Modern Icelandic only the dative is able to raise to the subject position. In other words, we argue that a change in the argument structure of the verb has taken place such that líka has changed from being an alternating (symmetric) verb to an asymmetric oblique subject verb. The main argument that is used to substantiate this claim comes from control infinitives in Old Icelandic, taking on the form in (i): (i) girntiz meirr at líka einum guði en mönnum desired.mid more to PRO.nom like.inf alone.dat god.dat than men.dat ‘(He) desired more to please God alone than men.’ (Æv 150.15) Based on a generative analysis of syntactic structure, we present evidence that reveals that the dative argument functions syntactically as the object, in addition to discussing other potential evidence based on word order. When the nominative argument is the subject, the meaning of 'líka' is sometimes closer to that of English 'please' than 'like'. We also discuss how this might be accounted for.https://ordogtunga.arnastofnun.is/index.php/ord-og-tunga/article/view/66alternating verbs(a)symmetric verbsvariationcase markingargument structure
spellingShingle Einar Freyr Sigurðsson
Heimir van der Feest Viðarsson
Frá skiptisögn til ósamhverfrar aukafallssagnar. Um 'líka' í fornu máli
Orð og Tunga
alternating verbs
(a)symmetric verbs
variation
case marking
argument structure
title Frá skiptisögn til ósamhverfrar aukafallssagnar. Um 'líka' í fornu máli
title_full Frá skiptisögn til ósamhverfrar aukafallssagnar. Um 'líka' í fornu máli
title_fullStr Frá skiptisögn til ósamhverfrar aukafallssagnar. Um 'líka' í fornu máli
title_full_unstemmed Frá skiptisögn til ósamhverfrar aukafallssagnar. Um 'líka' í fornu máli
title_short Frá skiptisögn til ósamhverfrar aukafallssagnar. Um 'líka' í fornu máli
title_sort fra skiptisogn til osamhverfrar aukafallssagnar um lika i fornu mali
topic alternating verbs
(a)symmetric verbs
variation
case marking
argument structure
url https://ordogtunga.arnastofnun.is/index.php/ord-og-tunga/article/view/66
work_keys_str_mv AT einarfreyrsigurðsson fraskiptisogntilosamhverfraraukafallssagnarumlikaifornumali
AT heimirvanderfeestviðarsson fraskiptisogntilosamhverfraraukafallssagnarumlikaifornumali