Comparison of hemodynamic response to adrenaline infiltration in children undergoing cleft palate repair during general anesthesia with sevoflurane and isoflurane

Background and Aims: Systemic absorption of adrenaline often used for infiltration during cleft palate surgery leads to adverse hemodynamic responses. These hemodynamic responses may be attenuated by the volatile anesthetics. This study aims to compare the hemodynamic responses to adrenaline infiltr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Poojita Reddy Gunnam, Padmaja Durga, Indira Gurajala, Prasad Rao Kaluvala, Prardhana Veerabathula, Gopinath Ramachandran
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2016-01-01
Series:Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.joacp.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9185;year=2016;volume=32;issue=1;spage=12;epage=17;aulast=Gunnam
_version_ 1818411241318645760
author Poojita Reddy Gunnam
Padmaja Durga
Indira Gurajala
Prasad Rao Kaluvala
Prardhana Veerabathula
Gopinath Ramachandran
author_facet Poojita Reddy Gunnam
Padmaja Durga
Indira Gurajala
Prasad Rao Kaluvala
Prardhana Veerabathula
Gopinath Ramachandran
author_sort Poojita Reddy Gunnam
collection DOAJ
description Background and Aims: Systemic absorption of adrenaline often used for infiltration during cleft palate surgery leads to adverse hemodynamic responses. These hemodynamic responses may be attenuated by the volatile anesthetics. This study aims to compare the hemodynamic responses to adrenaline infiltration during isoflurane (ISO) and sevoflurane (SEVO) anesthesia. Material and Methods: Sixty children aged between 9 months and 48 months, weighing between 8 kg and 20 kg, undergoing primary repair of cleft palate were randomly allocated into two groups: Group ISO - anesthesia maintained with ISO (2 minimum alveolar concentrations [MAC]) and nitrous oxide 50% and group SEVO - maintained on SEVO (2 MAC) and nitrous oxide 50%. Surgical site was infiltrated with 1 ml/kg of 1:200,000 solution of adrenaline with 0.5% lignocaine. Heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) were noted at the end of infiltration and every 1 min for 5 min following infiltration. The percentage change of hemodynamic responses from baseline, following infiltration were compared between the two groups. Results: There was no significant change in HR from baseline, and the response was comparable between the agents at all times. The blood pressure (BP) increased from baseline in both the groups but the increase was greater in SEVO than ISO group at 2 and 3 min after infiltration. The maximum change in HR from baseline (group ISO median 10.9% [interquartile range (IQR) 4.5-23.0] vs. group SEVO 26.5% [11.9-44.6]) was comparable in both the groups (P = 0.169). The maximum change in SBP was significantly greater in group SEVO than group ISO (42.8% [IQR 20.0-60.9] vs. 26.0 [11.3-44.5], P = 0.04). The incidence of significant change (>20%) of SBP, DBP, and MAP from baseline was significantly greater in group SEVO after infiltration and 1 min and 2 min after infiltration. There were no arrhythmias in any of the groups. Conclusion: Isoflurane results in greater attenuation of rise in BP during adrenaline infiltration compared to SEVO at similar MAC.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T10:28:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5aed8f5d20504ae399c8957acafc8191
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0970-9185
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T10:28:17Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
spelling doaj.art-5aed8f5d20504ae399c8957acafc81912022-12-21T23:06:15ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology0970-91852016-01-01321121710.4103/0970-9185.175650Comparison of hemodynamic response to adrenaline infiltration in children undergoing cleft palate repair during general anesthesia with sevoflurane and isofluranePoojita Reddy GunnamPadmaja DurgaIndira GurajalaPrasad Rao KaluvalaPrardhana VeerabathulaGopinath RamachandranBackground and Aims: Systemic absorption of adrenaline often used for infiltration during cleft palate surgery leads to adverse hemodynamic responses. These hemodynamic responses may be attenuated by the volatile anesthetics. This study aims to compare the hemodynamic responses to adrenaline infiltration during isoflurane (ISO) and sevoflurane (SEVO) anesthesia. Material and Methods: Sixty children aged between 9 months and 48 months, weighing between 8 kg and 20 kg, undergoing primary repair of cleft palate were randomly allocated into two groups: Group ISO - anesthesia maintained with ISO (2 minimum alveolar concentrations [MAC]) and nitrous oxide 50% and group SEVO - maintained on SEVO (2 MAC) and nitrous oxide 50%. Surgical site was infiltrated with 1 ml/kg of 1:200,000 solution of adrenaline with 0.5% lignocaine. Heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) were noted at the end of infiltration and every 1 min for 5 min following infiltration. The percentage change of hemodynamic responses from baseline, following infiltration were compared between the two groups. Results: There was no significant change in HR from baseline, and the response was comparable between the agents at all times. The blood pressure (BP) increased from baseline in both the groups but the increase was greater in SEVO than ISO group at 2 and 3 min after infiltration. The maximum change in HR from baseline (group ISO median 10.9% [interquartile range (IQR) 4.5-23.0] vs. group SEVO 26.5% [11.9-44.6]) was comparable in both the groups (P = 0.169). The maximum change in SBP was significantly greater in group SEVO than group ISO (42.8% [IQR 20.0-60.9] vs. 26.0 [11.3-44.5], P = 0.04). The incidence of significant change (>20%) of SBP, DBP, and MAP from baseline was significantly greater in group SEVO after infiltration and 1 min and 2 min after infiltration. There were no arrhythmias in any of the groups. Conclusion: Isoflurane results in greater attenuation of rise in BP during adrenaline infiltration compared to SEVO at similar MAC.http://www.joacp.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9185;year=2016;volume=32;issue=1;spage=12;epage=17;aulast=GunnamAdrenalineblood pressurecleft palateinfiltrationisofluranesevoflurane
spellingShingle Poojita Reddy Gunnam
Padmaja Durga
Indira Gurajala
Prasad Rao Kaluvala
Prardhana Veerabathula
Gopinath Ramachandran
Comparison of hemodynamic response to adrenaline infiltration in children undergoing cleft palate repair during general anesthesia with sevoflurane and isoflurane
Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
Adrenaline
blood pressure
cleft palate
infiltration
isoflurane
sevoflurane
title Comparison of hemodynamic response to adrenaline infiltration in children undergoing cleft palate repair during general anesthesia with sevoflurane and isoflurane
title_full Comparison of hemodynamic response to adrenaline infiltration in children undergoing cleft palate repair during general anesthesia with sevoflurane and isoflurane
title_fullStr Comparison of hemodynamic response to adrenaline infiltration in children undergoing cleft palate repair during general anesthesia with sevoflurane and isoflurane
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of hemodynamic response to adrenaline infiltration in children undergoing cleft palate repair during general anesthesia with sevoflurane and isoflurane
title_short Comparison of hemodynamic response to adrenaline infiltration in children undergoing cleft palate repair during general anesthesia with sevoflurane and isoflurane
title_sort comparison of hemodynamic response to adrenaline infiltration in children undergoing cleft palate repair during general anesthesia with sevoflurane and isoflurane
topic Adrenaline
blood pressure
cleft palate
infiltration
isoflurane
sevoflurane
url http://www.joacp.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9185;year=2016;volume=32;issue=1;spage=12;epage=17;aulast=Gunnam
work_keys_str_mv AT poojitareddygunnam comparisonofhemodynamicresponsetoadrenalineinfiltrationinchildrenundergoingcleftpalaterepairduringgeneralanesthesiawithsevofluraneandisoflurane
AT padmajadurga comparisonofhemodynamicresponsetoadrenalineinfiltrationinchildrenundergoingcleftpalaterepairduringgeneralanesthesiawithsevofluraneandisoflurane
AT indiragurajala comparisonofhemodynamicresponsetoadrenalineinfiltrationinchildrenundergoingcleftpalaterepairduringgeneralanesthesiawithsevofluraneandisoflurane
AT prasadraokaluvala comparisonofhemodynamicresponsetoadrenalineinfiltrationinchildrenundergoingcleftpalaterepairduringgeneralanesthesiawithsevofluraneandisoflurane
AT prardhanaveerabathula comparisonofhemodynamicresponsetoadrenalineinfiltrationinchildrenundergoingcleftpalaterepairduringgeneralanesthesiawithsevofluraneandisoflurane
AT gopinathramachandran comparisonofhemodynamicresponsetoadrenalineinfiltrationinchildrenundergoingcleftpalaterepairduringgeneralanesthesiawithsevofluraneandisoflurane