The War on Terror and the Laws of War: A Military Perspective
In this well-timed revision to the first edition published in 2009, the authors allow the reader to benefit from their unique yet balanced perspectives as they address some of the most pressing issues in the enduring campaign to defeat terrorism insofar as they co...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Ubiquity Press
2015-08-01
|
| Series: | Utrecht Journal of International and European Law |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.utrechtjournal.org/jms/article/view/227 |
| _version_ | 1818229709923680256 |
|---|---|
| author | Ben Stanford |
| author_facet | Ben Stanford |
| author_sort | Ben Stanford |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In this well-timed revision to the first edition published in 2009,
the authors allow the reader to benefit from their unique yet balanced perspectives as
they address some of the most pressing issues in the enduring campaign to defeat
terrorism insofar as they concern the laws of war. The six authors, all of whom served
in some capacity in the Armed Forces of the United States of America (USA), confess not
to provide a critical analysis of the official characterisation of the ‘War on Terror’
as a genuine armed conflict under international humanitarian law. A reader expecting
such an approach should invest their time and attention elsewhere. Whilst acknowledging
that ‘it is clear that the term “war on terror” is legally and operationally overbroad
and misleading’,1 the authors choose to ground their contributions on the basis that the
USA has operated, and continues to operate, as if it were in an armed conflict with
al-Qaeda and its associated groups. According to the authors, this stance is justified
by the argument that the three branches of government of the USA have repeatedly and
consistently reached decisions to this effect. As a result, many readers might be
inclined to approach the book with caution at first. This fundamental stance is however
well-noted, emphasised, and indeed reasonable as the authors approach the controversial
subjects from a factual, and most importantly, a military perspective. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-12T10:22:55Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-5afb7e0290a5438580292bd94219067f |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2053-5341 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-12T10:22:55Z |
| publishDate | 2015-08-01 |
| publisher | Ubiquity Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Utrecht Journal of International and European Law |
| spelling | doaj.art-5afb7e0290a5438580292bd94219067f2022-12-22T00:27:31ZengUbiquity PressUtrecht Journal of International and European Law2053-53412015-08-013181100103111The War on Terror and the Laws of War: A Military PerspectiveBen Stanford0PhD Fellow in Terrorism and Human Rights, University of Bedfordshire (United Kingdom).In this well-timed revision to the first edition published in 2009, the authors allow the reader to benefit from their unique yet balanced perspectives as they address some of the most pressing issues in the enduring campaign to defeat terrorism insofar as they concern the laws of war. The six authors, all of whom served in some capacity in the Armed Forces of the United States of America (USA), confess not to provide a critical analysis of the official characterisation of the ‘War on Terror’ as a genuine armed conflict under international humanitarian law. A reader expecting such an approach should invest their time and attention elsewhere. Whilst acknowledging that ‘it is clear that the term “war on terror” is legally and operationally overbroad and misleading’,1 the authors choose to ground their contributions on the basis that the USA has operated, and continues to operate, as if it were in an armed conflict with al-Qaeda and its associated groups. According to the authors, this stance is justified by the argument that the three branches of government of the USA have repeatedly and consistently reached decisions to this effect. As a result, many readers might be inclined to approach the book with caution at first. This fundamental stance is however well-noted, emphasised, and indeed reasonable as the authors approach the controversial subjects from a factual, and most importantly, a military perspective.http://www.utrechtjournal.org/jms/article/view/227war on terrorinternational humanitarian lawlaw of armed conflicttargetingdetention |
| spellingShingle | Ben Stanford The War on Terror and the Laws of War: A Military Perspective Utrecht Journal of International and European Law war on terror international humanitarian law law of armed conflict targeting detention |
| title | The War on Terror and the Laws of War: A Military Perspective |
| title_full | The War on Terror and the Laws of War: A Military Perspective |
| title_fullStr | The War on Terror and the Laws of War: A Military Perspective |
| title_full_unstemmed | The War on Terror and the Laws of War: A Military Perspective |
| title_short | The War on Terror and the Laws of War: A Military Perspective |
| title_sort | war on terror and the laws of war a military perspective |
| topic | war on terror international humanitarian law law of armed conflict targeting detention |
| url | http://www.utrechtjournal.org/jms/article/view/227 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT benstanford thewaronterrorandthelawsofwaramilitaryperspective AT benstanford waronterrorandthelawsofwaramilitaryperspective |