Exploring Physically Motivated Models to Fit Gamma-Ray Burst Spectra

We explore fitting gamma-ray burst (GRB) spectra with three physically motivated models, and thus revisit the viability of synchrotron radiation as the primary source of GRB prompt emission. We pick a sample of 100 bright GRBs observed by the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM), based on their energ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. Poolakkil, R. Preece, P. Veres
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2023-01-01
Series:The Astrophysical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad0e11
_version_ 1797397069077413888
author S. Poolakkil
R. Preece
P. Veres
author_facet S. Poolakkil
R. Preece
P. Veres
author_sort S. Poolakkil
collection DOAJ
description We explore fitting gamma-ray burst (GRB) spectra with three physically motivated models, and thus revisit the viability of synchrotron radiation as the primary source of GRB prompt emission. We pick a sample of 100 bright GRBs observed by the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM), based on their energy flux values. In addition to the standard empirical spectral models used in previous GBM spectroscopy catalogs, we also consider three physically motivated models; (a) a thermal synchrotron model, (b) a Band model with a high-energy cutoff, and (c) a smoothly broken power-law (SBPL) model with a multiplicative broken power law (MBPL). We then adopt the Bayesian information criterion to compare the fits obtained and choose the best model. We find that 42% of the GRBs from the fluence spectra and 23% of GRBs from the peak-flux spectra have one of the three physically motivated models as their preferred one. From the peak-flux spectral fits, we find that the low-energy index distributions from the empirical model fits for long GRBs peak around the synchrotron value of −2/3, while the two low-energy indices from the SBPL+MBPL fits of long GRBs peak close to the −2/3 and −3/2 values expected for a synchrotron spectrum from marginally fast-cooling electrons.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T01:04:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5b03ba7e52f843209c4142bf1e01c0bc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1538-4357
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T01:04:39Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series The Astrophysical Journal
spelling doaj.art-5b03ba7e52f843209c4142bf1e01c0bc2023-12-11T11:39:06ZengIOP PublishingThe Astrophysical Journal1538-43572023-01-0195929110.3847/1538-4357/ad0e11Exploring Physically Motivated Models to Fit Gamma-Ray Burst SpectraS. Poolakkil0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6269-0452R. Preece1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1626-7335P. Veres2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2149-9846Department of Space Science, University of Alabama in Huntsville , Huntsville, AL 35899, USA; Center for Space Plasma and Aeronomic Research, University of Alabama in Huntsville , Huntsville, AL 35899, USADepartment of Space Science, University of Alabama in Huntsville , Huntsville, AL 35899, USADepartment of Space Science, University of Alabama in Huntsville , Huntsville, AL 35899, USA; Center for Space Plasma and Aeronomic Research, University of Alabama in Huntsville , Huntsville, AL 35899, USAWe explore fitting gamma-ray burst (GRB) spectra with three physically motivated models, and thus revisit the viability of synchrotron radiation as the primary source of GRB prompt emission. We pick a sample of 100 bright GRBs observed by the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM), based on their energy flux values. In addition to the standard empirical spectral models used in previous GBM spectroscopy catalogs, we also consider three physically motivated models; (a) a thermal synchrotron model, (b) a Band model with a high-energy cutoff, and (c) a smoothly broken power-law (SBPL) model with a multiplicative broken power law (MBPL). We then adopt the Bayesian information criterion to compare the fits obtained and choose the best model. We find that 42% of the GRBs from the fluence spectra and 23% of GRBs from the peak-flux spectra have one of the three physically motivated models as their preferred one. From the peak-flux spectral fits, we find that the low-energy index distributions from the empirical model fits for long GRBs peak around the synchrotron value of −2/3, while the two low-energy indices from the SBPL+MBPL fits of long GRBs peak close to the −2/3 and −3/2 values expected for a synchrotron spectrum from marginally fast-cooling electrons.https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad0e11Gamma-ray bursts
spellingShingle S. Poolakkil
R. Preece
P. Veres
Exploring Physically Motivated Models to Fit Gamma-Ray Burst Spectra
The Astrophysical Journal
Gamma-ray bursts
title Exploring Physically Motivated Models to Fit Gamma-Ray Burst Spectra
title_full Exploring Physically Motivated Models to Fit Gamma-Ray Burst Spectra
title_fullStr Exploring Physically Motivated Models to Fit Gamma-Ray Burst Spectra
title_full_unstemmed Exploring Physically Motivated Models to Fit Gamma-Ray Burst Spectra
title_short Exploring Physically Motivated Models to Fit Gamma-Ray Burst Spectra
title_sort exploring physically motivated models to fit gamma ray burst spectra
topic Gamma-ray bursts
url https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad0e11
work_keys_str_mv AT spoolakkil exploringphysicallymotivatedmodelstofitgammarayburstspectra
AT rpreece exploringphysicallymotivatedmodelstofitgammarayburstspectra
AT pveres exploringphysicallymotivatedmodelstofitgammarayburstspectra