Do cratons preserve evidence of stagnant lid tectonics?

Evidence for episodic crustal growth extending back to the Hadean has recently prompted a number of numerically based geodynamic models that incorporate cyclic changes from stagnant lid to mobile lid tectonics. A large part of the geologic record is missing for the times at which several of these cy...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Derek Wyman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018-01-01
Series:Geoscience Frontiers
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987117300300
_version_ 1797764249599082496
author Derek Wyman
author_facet Derek Wyman
author_sort Derek Wyman
collection DOAJ
description Evidence for episodic crustal growth extending back to the Hadean has recently prompted a number of numerically based geodynamic models that incorporate cyclic changes from stagnant lid to mobile lid tectonics. A large part of the geologic record is missing for the times at which several of these cycles are inferred to have taken place. The cratons, however, are likely to retain important clues relating to similar cycles developed in the Mesoarchean and Neoarchean. Widespread acceptance of a form of plate tectonics by ∼3.2 Ga is not at odds with the sporadic occurrence of stagnant lid tectonics after this time. The concept of scale as applied to cratons, mantle plumes and Neoarchean volcanic arcs are likely to provide important constraints on future models of Earth's geodynamic evolution. The Superior Province will provide some of the most concrete evidence in this regard given that its constituent blocks may have been locked into a stagnant lid relatively soon after their formation and then assembled in the next global plate tectonic interval. Perceived complexities associated with inferred mantle plume – volcanic arc associations in the Superior Province and other cratons may be related to an over estimation of plume size. A possible stagnant lid episode between ∼2.9 Ga and ∼2.8 Ga is identified by previously unexplained lapses in volcanism on cratons, including the Kaapvaal, Yilgarn and Superior Province cratons. If real, then mantle dynamics associated with this episode likely eliminated any contemporaneous mantle plume incubation sites, which has important implications for widespread plumes developed at ∼2.7 Ga and favours a shallow mantle source in the transition zone. The Superior Province provides a uniquely preserved local proxy for this global event and could serve as the basis for detailed numerical models in the future.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T19:53:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5b06a8888b8b42df8cd878dd5def28ac
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1674-9871
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T19:53:52Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Geoscience Frontiers
spelling doaj.art-5b06a8888b8b42df8cd878dd5def28ac2023-08-02T02:57:52ZengElsevierGeoscience Frontiers1674-98712018-01-019131710.1016/j.gsf.2017.02.001Do cratons preserve evidence of stagnant lid tectonics?Derek WymanEvidence for episodic crustal growth extending back to the Hadean has recently prompted a number of numerically based geodynamic models that incorporate cyclic changes from stagnant lid to mobile lid tectonics. A large part of the geologic record is missing for the times at which several of these cycles are inferred to have taken place. The cratons, however, are likely to retain important clues relating to similar cycles developed in the Mesoarchean and Neoarchean. Widespread acceptance of a form of plate tectonics by ∼3.2 Ga is not at odds with the sporadic occurrence of stagnant lid tectonics after this time. The concept of scale as applied to cratons, mantle plumes and Neoarchean volcanic arcs are likely to provide important constraints on future models of Earth's geodynamic evolution. The Superior Province will provide some of the most concrete evidence in this regard given that its constituent blocks may have been locked into a stagnant lid relatively soon after their formation and then assembled in the next global plate tectonic interval. Perceived complexities associated with inferred mantle plume – volcanic arc associations in the Superior Province and other cratons may be related to an over estimation of plume size. A possible stagnant lid episode between ∼2.9 Ga and ∼2.8 Ga is identified by previously unexplained lapses in volcanism on cratons, including the Kaapvaal, Yilgarn and Superior Province cratons. If real, then mantle dynamics associated with this episode likely eliminated any contemporaneous mantle plume incubation sites, which has important implications for widespread plumes developed at ∼2.7 Ga and favours a shallow mantle source in the transition zone. The Superior Province provides a uniquely preserved local proxy for this global event and could serve as the basis for detailed numerical models in the future.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987117300300ArcheanMantle overturnSuperior ProvinceMantle plumesStagnant lid tectonics
spellingShingle Derek Wyman
Do cratons preserve evidence of stagnant lid tectonics?
Geoscience Frontiers
Archean
Mantle overturn
Superior Province
Mantle plumes
Stagnant lid tectonics
title Do cratons preserve evidence of stagnant lid tectonics?
title_full Do cratons preserve evidence of stagnant lid tectonics?
title_fullStr Do cratons preserve evidence of stagnant lid tectonics?
title_full_unstemmed Do cratons preserve evidence of stagnant lid tectonics?
title_short Do cratons preserve evidence of stagnant lid tectonics?
title_sort do cratons preserve evidence of stagnant lid tectonics
topic Archean
Mantle overturn
Superior Province
Mantle plumes
Stagnant lid tectonics
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987117300300
work_keys_str_mv AT derekwyman docratonspreserveevidenceofstagnantlidtectonics